low dose sevoflurane group
Druglow volume volatile anesthetics (1.0%)
Other names: 1.0 %sevoflurane
NCT Number: NCT03134547
This study was performed to compare the incidence of EA between two dose of sevoflurane for sedation with caudal block in children, and intended to find the optimal dose for prevention of sevoflurane induced emergence agitation
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me1 year–5 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
After approval Institutional Review Board of our institute, informed consent was obtained from the parents of all pediatric patients. 40 children, aged up to 5 yr, undergoing elective subumbilical surgery were enrolled. Children with development delay, anxiety disorder, or a history of allergy to any study drugs, or severe systemic disease were excluded from this study. By a computer generated schedule, children were randomized to either the low dose (1.0%) end tidal concentration of sevoflurane group (Group LS) or the high dose (2.5%) end tidal concentration of sevoflurane group (Group HS). The patients were sedated with intravenous ketamine 2 mg/kg and midazolam 0.05 mg/kg at waiting room and checked the loss of response to verbal or gentle touch. Then the patients were into the operating room, applied electrocardiography (ECG), pulse oximetry, and noninvasive blood pressure. Respiratory rate and end tidal carbon dioxide (CO2) were monitored via face mask. After baseline vital signs were monitored, the patient was posed in lateral Sims position, and 1 ml/kg lidocaine 1% with 5 μg/ml epinephrine was injected into the caudal space using a 22 G needle under 100% oxygen with each sevoflurane concentration according to group through a face mask. All of these procedures were performed by one skilled anesthesiologist who blinded about the study group. After caudal block was performed, the patients were returned in supine position, and maintained on spontaneous ventilation under 100% oxygen and each sevoflurane concentration according to group via face mask to conduct sedation during operation. If oxygen saturation decreases lesser than 90% due to over sedation or breathe holding caused by procedural pain, ventilation was assisted. If analgesia was insufficient for operation, fentanyl 0.5-1 μg/kg was administrated properly.
In the postanesthetic care unit (PACU), the investigators observed EA episodes at 5 and 30 min after PACU arrival using Four-point agitation scale and Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale, and if a total score of PAED scale is higher than 15, which is prescribed a severe agitation, and then propofol 0.5 mg/kg was administered. EA was considered as an Four-point agitation scale > 3 or PAED scale > 10.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
low volume volatile anesthetics (1.0%)
Other names: 1.0 %sevoflurane
high volume volatile anesthetics (2.5%)
Other names: 2.5% sevoflurane
Time frame: 5 minutes in the recovery room
Four-point agitation scale
Time frame: 30 minutes in the recovery room
Four-point agitation scale
Time frame: 5 minutes in the recovery room
Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale
Time frame: 30 minutes in the recovery room
Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale
Yeungnam University College of Medicine
Other
A Comparison of Postoperative Emergence Agitation by Sevoflurane for Intraoperative Sedation Associated With Caudal Block in Children: Randomised Comparison of Two Dose
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07645521
Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS), Confusion
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07630922
Confusion, Delirium
Zhengzhou, Henan, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07304206
Confusion, Delirium
Malatya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07082894
Adenotonsillectomy, Confusion
Tanta, Gharbia Governorate, Egypt
View Trial Details