Ciclesonide
Druginhaled Ciclesonide
NCT Number: NCT00384189
The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of inhaled ciclesonide at three different dose levels compared with placebo with respect to pulmonary function, asthma symptoms, and use of rescue medication in children aged 6-11 years with asthma. Treatment medication will be administered as follows: ciclesonide or placebo will be inhaled once daily in the evening. The study consists of a baseline period (2 to 4 weeks) and a treatment period (12 weeks). The study provides further data on safety and tolerability of ciclesonide.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me6 year–11 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Altana Pharma/Nycomed, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
The drug being tested is called ciclesonide. This study looked at the safety and efficacy of inhaled ciclesonide in children with asthma. The study enrolled 1080 patients.
Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment groups which were undisclosed to the patient and study doctor during the study:• Ciclesonide 40 µg, 80 µg or 160 µg • Placebo- this is similar to study drug but has no active ingredient. Ciclesonide was inhaled via a metered-dose inhaler (MDI with HFA-134a propellant), with or without spacer, once daily in the evening throughout the study. All participants were asked to document daily AM and PM peak expiratory flow (PEF), daytime and nighttime asthma symptom scores and number of puffs of rescue medicine in an electronic diary. This multi-centre trial was conducted worldwide. The overall time to participate in this study was 20 weeks. Participants made multiple visits to the clinic plus a final visit 30 days after the last dose of study drug for a follow-up assessment.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Main Inclusion Criteria:
Main Exclusion Criteria:
inhaled Ciclesonide
Ciclesonide placebo-matching inhaler
Salbutamol inhalation powder
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
PEF is the maximum speed of expiration. A portable electronic PEF meter was used for the home PEF readings. The patients recorded PEF daily, in the morning immediately after getting up. Readings were done preferably at least 4 hours after use of rescue medication and before inhalation of the study medication. At each measurement, three readings were obtained in the standing position. All three values were recorded in the diary; the highest value was used for evaluation. The higher change from Baseline values are the best. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with the baseline value and age as covariates was used for analysis. Last observation carried forward.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Kaplan Meier Estimates of the probability of not experiencing LOE by Week 12 was measured. LOE was reached if any of the following criteria occurred during the treatment period: • asthma exacerbation (a worsening of asthma symptoms requiring a change in medication; • nocturnal awakenings due to asthma on any 4 or more nights during any 7-consecutive-day period; • use of more than 8 puffs/day of salbutamol on any 4 or more days during any 7-consecutive-day period; • decrease in morning PEF to <80% of randomization value on any 4 consecutive days during the treatment period.
Time frame: 28 days prior to last visit (Up to 12 Weeks)
Control of asthma was evaluated on a daily basis (24 hours) using the following variables: asthma symptoms, use of rescue medication, morning (am) PEF and PEF fluctuation. The median percentage of days with asthma control is presented.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Spirometry was performed according to local standards. FEV1 is the maximal amount of air forcefully exhaled from the lungs in one second. Higher change numbers indicate better lung function.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Spirometry was performed according to local standards. PEF is the maximum speed of expiration. Analysis was ANCOVA with factors value at Baseline, treatment, age, sex, center pool, ICS pretreatment, spacer use and asthma severity. Higher change numbers indicate better lung function.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 1 thru 12
PEF is the maximum speed of expiration. A portable electronic PEF meter was used for the home PEF readings. The patients recorded PEF daily, in the morning immediately after getting up. Readings were done preferably at least 4 hours after use of rescue medication and before inhalation of the study medication. At each measurement, three readings were obtained in the standing position. All three values were recorded in the diary; the highest value was used for evaluation. The higher change from Baseline values are the best. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with the Baseline value and age as covariates was used for analysis.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
PEF is the maximum speed of expiration. A portable electronic PEF meter was used for the home PEF readings. The patients recorded PEF daily, in the morning immediately after getting up. Readings were done preferably at least 4 hours after use of rescue medication and before inhalation of the study medication. At each measurement, three readings were obtained in the standing position. All three values were recorded in the diary; the highest value was used for evaluation. The higher change from Baseline values are the best. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with the Baseline value and age as covariates was used for analysis.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
PEF is the maximum speed of expiration. A portable electronic PEF meter was used for the home PEF readings. The patients recorded PEF daily, in the morning immediately after getting up. Readings were done preferably at least 4 hours after use of rescue medication and before inhalation of the study medication. At each measurement, three readings were obtained in the standing position. All three values were recorded in the diary; the highest value was used for evaluation. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with the Baseline value and age as covariates was used for analysis.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Measurements of both nighttime and daytime asthma symptoms were assessed on a daily basis by the patient in the electronic diary, according to the following scales: Nighttime Asthma Score using a 5 point scale: 0=no asthma symptoms, slept through the night to 4=bad night, awake most of the night because of asthma. Daytime Asthma Score using a 5 point scale: 0=very well, no asthma symptoms to 4=asthma very bad, unable to carry out daily activities as usual. Total possible overall daily score range from 0(best) to 4 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
The daily use of rescue medication (salbutamol) was recorded in the electronic diary in the morning and the evening. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: 28 days prior to last visit (Up to 12 Weeks)
Control of asthma was evaluated on a daily basis (24 hours) using the following variables: asthma symptoms, use of rescue medication, and morning (am) PEF. The median percentage of days with asthma control is presented.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
PAQLQS is a disease specific instrument to assess the impact of asthma on the patient's quality of life. The PAQLQS consists of 23 items in 3 domains evaluating activity limitations, symptoms and emotional function. Patients answered each question using a 7-point scale from 1= maximum impairment to 7=no impairment) about their experience during the previous week. Total possible score ranging from 23 (worst) to 161(best). Higher change from Baseline scores are the best. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with the baseline value and age as covariates was used for analysis.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
PACQLQ assesses the impact of the child's asthma on the quality of life of the caregiver. The PACQLQ consists of 13 items in 2 domains evaluating activity limitations and emotional function. Caregivers answered each question using a 7-point scale from 1= maximum impairment to 7=no impairment about their experience during the previous week. Total possible score ranging from 13 (worst) to 91(best). Higher change from Baseline scores are the best. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with the baseline value and age as covariates was used for analysis.
AstraZeneca
Industry
A Comparative Study of Inhaled Ciclesonide Versus Placebo in Children With Asthma
Acronym: RAINBOW
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07394127
Asthma, Asthma Chronic
Gümüşhane, Trabzon, Ordu, Giresun, Rize, Artvin, Gümüşhane, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT01678222
Allergic Inflammation, Asthma
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03937804
Asthma, Bronchial Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03927820
Asthma, Bronchial Diseases
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
View Trial Details