Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02274688

A Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Optimal Patient-Centered Care

The nation's trauma care system, which includes trauma center hospitals & emergency departments, is where over 30 million Americans receive care after traumatic injuries each year. Injury victims are diverse patients who suffer from complications of the initial injury as well as from multiple complex medical & mental health conditions. Currently, high-quality patient-centered care is not the standard of care throughout US trauma care systems. Injured trauma survivors treated in trauma care systems frequently receive fragmented care that is not coordinated across hospital, emergency department, outpatient, & community settings. Post-injury care is frequently not individualized to integrate the patient's most pressing post-traumatic concerns & preferences into medical decision making. The investigators, as a group of front-line trauma center providers, patients, researchers & policy makers, have been working together for over a decade to integrate patient-centered care into US trauma care systems. The investigators began this work by asking groups of injured patients the key patient-centered question: "Of everything that has happened to you since your injury, what concerns you the most?" The investigators developed scientifically sound assessment tools that allowed us to follow patient concerns after injury hospitalization. In May of 2011, the investigators convened an American College of Surgeons' policy summit that addressed mental health & patient-centered care integration across US trauma care systems. As part of this policy summit, patient members of our team presented their experiences of traumatic injury & recovery. While giving injured patients a "voice" at the summit, these narratives did not move surgical policy makers to develop mandates or guidelines for patient-centered care. In contrast, presentations that included information from randomized comparative effectiveness trials & standardized outcome assessments convinced surgical policy makers to develop US trauma care system policy mandates & best practice guidelines for post-traumatic stress disorder & alcohol use problems. Our team now realizes that in order to optimally integrate patient-centered care into US trauma care systems, the investigators must use the best scientific methods that capture the highest-quality data. This PCORI proposal aims to demonstrate that a patient-centered care management treatment that addresses patient's post-injury concerns & integrates patient concerns & preferences into medical decision making, while also coordinating care, can improve outcomes of great importance to patients & their caregivers, front-line providers & policy makers. This proposal directly addresses two PCORI patient-centered research questions: "After a traumatic injury, what can I do to improve the outcomes that are most important to me?" & "How can front-line providers working in trauma care systems help me make the best decisions about my post-injury health & health care?"

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

14 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Harborview Medical Center

Seattle, Washington, 98104, United States

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Seen in acute care emergency department or trauma center setting for injury
  • At least three post traumatic concerns
  • AND One of the following PTSD Checklist Score (PCL-C) greater than or equal to 35 Patient Health Questionnaire 9 - greater than or equal to 10 Any endorsement of suicidal ideation on the PhQ-9 Item 9

Exclusion criteria

  • Non-English speaking
  • Under 14 years of age
  • Incarcerated
  • Psychotic behavior
  • Suffered head, spinal cord, or other severe injuries that prevent participation in the inpatient ward interview.

Treatment and study plan

Stepped Care Management

Behavioral

Case management, information technology/mHealth innovations, stepped-up psychopharmacology and psychotherapy elements.

Other names: Intervention

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Post Traumatic Concerns Over the Course of the Six Months After Injury

    Time frame: The investigators assessed at baseline, 1-, 3-, and 6-month.

    The primary outcome is the endorsement of ≥1 severe posttraumatic concerns.

  2. Change in Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Symptoms Over the Course of the Six Months After Injury

    Time frame: The investigators assessed at baseline, 1-, 3-, and 6-month.

    The investigators used the PTSD Checklist - Civilian (PCL-C) as a continuous measure. The scoring of the scale ranges from a minumum of 17 to a maximum of 85, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. No subscales were used.

  3. Change in Depression Symptoms Over the Course of the Six Months After Injury

    Time frame: The investigators assessed at baseline, 1-, 3-, and 6-month.

    The investigators used the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) as a continuous measure, with scores ranging from 1 to 27. Higher scores represent a worse outcome. No subscales were used.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Alcohol Use Problems

    Time frame: The investigators assessed at baseline, 1-, 3-, and 6-month.

    The investigators used the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) as a continuous measure. The 10-item scale score ranges from 0-40, with higher values indicating a worse outcome. No sub scales were used.

  2. Functional Status

    Time frame: The investigators assessed at baseline, 1-, 3-, and 6-month.

    The investigators used the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form healthy survey (MOS SF-12/36) physical components summary to assess physical function. The minimum and maximum scores are 0-100 with higher scores representing a better outcome. No other subscales will be used.

  3. Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation

    Time frame: The investigators assessed at baseline, 1-, 3-, and 6-month.

    The investigators used PHQ-9 item 9 to assess suicidal ideation. For the analysis, a score of > 0 on item 9 of PHQ-9 was considered a positive endorsement and a worse outcome.

  4. Number of Patients Carrying a Weapon

    Time frame: The investigators assessed at baseline, 1-, 3-, and 6-month.

    The investigation used a single yes/no item to assess whether the patient was carrying a weapon.

  5. Number of Participants With One or More Emergency Department Visits Over Time

    Time frame: The investigators assessed emergency department service use over the course of the study.

    The investigators used population level data on emergency department health service use for the intent-to-treat sample

  6. Drug Use Problems

    Time frame: The investigators assessed at baseline, 1-, 3-, and 6-month.

    The investigators used the Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST-10) as a continuous outcome measure. DAST-10 scale scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores representing a worse outcome. No subscales were used.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Washington

Other

Collaborators

  • Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Registry information

Official study title

A Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Optimal Patient-Centered Care for US Trauma Care Systems

Acronym: TSOS 5

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Oct 24, 2014
Registry last updated
Nov 21, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.