Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02240550

A Comparative Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of ProFlor vs. Lichtenstein for Inguinal Hernia Repair

This investigation will be a double-armed, randomized (Blinded patients and Blinded examiner) prospective study designed to collect perioperative and postoperative data to compare the QOL of ProFlor vs. Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Healing Hands Clinic

Pune, India

About this study

The primary objectives of this study will be to evaluate the immediate and short-term amount of post-operative pain, the quality of life (QOL), as well as return to normal activities (work) for the two procedures. Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) and Visual Analogue Score (VAS) assessments will be held at regular intervals to evaluate these objectives.

The secondary objective of the study is to identify any short-term study related complications/adverse events.

The follow up will be immediately post-operative, post-operative day 1, and 1, 2,and 4 weeks. The first and 4th week's visits are mandatory office visits (if possible). If not available for office visit, a CCS assessment will be mailed or will be conducted via phone.

Up to 50 patients may be enrolled for this study (25 per arm). A report may be generated for presentation at an international meeting such as the AHS, EHS, or APHS if decided by the lead investigator.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Scheduled to undergo routine inguinal hernia repair
  • Male and Female patients between 18 and 65 years old
  • Competent to give consent
  • Clinically relevant inguinal hernia (classification: EHS P L/M 1/2/3)
  • Defect size at operation is between 5mm and 35mm
  • Diagnosed with unilateral, direct, indirect or mixed inguinal hernia
  • Primary hernia at the operative site

Exclusion criteria

  • Signs of obvious local or systemic infection
  • Any previous surgery on the hernia operative site
  • Hernia is not in the inguinal area
  • Hernia is not identified as indirect or direct
  • Femoral hernias
  • Known collagen disorder
  • Presenting with unstable angina or NYHA class of IV
  • Known Pregnancy or Nursing women
  • Active drug user
  • Recurrence of a repair by any method
  • Patients with giant inguinoscrotal hernia or abdominal wall defect >35 mm in diameter - e.g. large direct or combined inguinal hernia type Nyhus IIIb / EHS P L/M 1/2/3
  • Immunosuppression, prednisone>15 mg/day, active chemotherapy
  • End stage renal disease
  • Abdominal ascites
  • Skin infection in area of surgical field
  • BMI >35
  • Peritoneum cannot be closed
  • Patient has a clinically relevant co-morbidity (antithrombic prophylaxis due to cardiovascular pathologies, diabetes requiring insulin therapy or immunodeficiency syndrome of any type)
  • Neutropenia with absolute neutrophil count (ANC)<500 cells/mm3
  • Significant of life-threatening condition (e.g., endocarditis) that would confound or interfere with the procedure
  • Patients that require anticoagulant monitoring with an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)
  • Patients unwilling to forego blood and/or blood product donation for at least 3 months from initiation of first study device
  • Treatment with investigational medicinal product within 30 days before enrollment and for the duration of the study
  • Investigational device present, or removed within 30 days before enrollment, or presence of device-related infection
  • Patients who the investigator considers unlikely to adhere to the protocol or complete the clinical study

Treatment and study plan

ProFlor Hernia Repair System

Device

The 3-D hernia mesh will be used in the repair of your inguinal hernia.

Other names: 3D mesh

Lichtenstein hernia repair

Device

The standard Lichtenstein hernia repair with flat mesh will be used in the treatment of your inguinal hernia.

Other names: Polypropylene

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluate the immediate and short-term amount of pain.

    Time frame: 1 month

    We will evaluate the immediate and short-term amount of pain using the VAS and Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) assessments held at regular intervals.

  2. Compare the time required for return to normal activities (work).

    Time frame: 1 month

    We will capture the time required to return to normal activities as indicated by the patient.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Identify any short-term related complication/adverse events associated with the procedures.

    Time frame: 1 month

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Insightra Medical, Inc.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective, Randomized, Double-armed, Single-blinded, Comparative Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of ProFlor vs. Lichtenstein for Inguinal Hernia Repair

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Sep 15, 2014
Registry last updated
Jan 18, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.