Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01499173

A Community Partnership to Treat Stroke

Getting to the hospital quickly is the key to treating stroke. African Americans suffer more strokes with worse outcomes and receive stroke treatments less often than European Americans. This project will work to reduce these health disparities by creating and testing the feasibility of a peer-led faith-based behavioral intervention in an African American community with a goal to increase calls to 911 so stroke patients can be treated quickly.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

10 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Flint, Michigan, 48505, United States

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

To meet participant eligibility criteria, individuals must be 18 years of age or older (adult intervention) or between 10-17 years of age (youth intervention), a resident of the Flint or greater Flint community, and English speaking.

Exclusion criteria

We will attempt to exclude those who cannot read English because they will not be able to benefit from the intervention materials. These criteria will be confirmed during assessment procedures prior to enrollment.

Treatment and study plan

Stroke Preparedness Intervention

Behavioral

A faith-based, scientific theory-driven, peer-led behavioral intervention performed in a group setting in African American churches.

Primary outcomes

  1. Completion

    Time frame: 1 week

    Number of participants who complete the intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Change in Behavioral Intent to Call 911

    Time frame: 1 week elapsed between a pretest before 1st workshop and post-test at the end of 2nd workshop

    The pre-test is conducted one week prior to the post-test. A higher score indicates greater behavioral intent. Behavioral intent is measured on a scale of 0 - 8, where 0 indicates no correct answers in responses to scenarios, and 8 indicates appropriate responses (calling 911 every time it is appropriate) to the scenarios presented.

  2. Mean Change in Stroke Recognition

    Time frame: 1 week elapsed between a pretest before 1st workshop and post-test at the end of 2nd workshop

    Stroke recognition was scored on a 0 - 9 point scale where 0 represents no correct answers regarding 9 scenarios and 9 represents perfect stroke recognition.

  3. Perception of Social Norms Clustered Within Churches Across Multiple Time Points

    Time frame: 1 week between pretest before 1st workshop and post-test at the end of 2nd workshop and 1 month till the delayed post test

    Perception of social norms is measured by the odds ratio of the responses to questions of participant agreement with others' influence to calling 911 if he/she were to see a stroke. Odds ratios measure the odds of responses, so higher odds ratios suggest greater odds of the positive change in social norms in the post-test compared to the pre-test. Questions: 1) Most people would call 911 if they were to see a stroke. 2) My family would want me to call 911 if I were to see a stroke. Given that participants within each church are more alike than participants between churches and the multiple time points, hierarchical models were used. Specifically, multilevel mixed-effects ordered logistic regression models with a fixed church-level intercept and a random participant level intercept were used to explore change between baseline and immediate post-test and baseline and delayed post-test social norms after accounting for the participants' church.

  4. Perception of Self-efficacy Clustered Within Churches Across Multiple Time Points

    Time frame: 1 week between pretest before 1st workshop and post-test at the end of 2nd workshop and 1 month till the delayed post test

    Perception of self-efficacy is measured by the odds ratios of the responses to questions of participant confidence in being able to identify and respond appropriately to a stroke. Odds ratios measure the odds of responses, so higher odds ratios suggest greater odds of positive self-efficacy change in the post-test compared to the pretest. Questions asking about self-efficacy were:1) I would be able to tell if someone is having a stroke and 2) I know what to do if I saw someone having a stroke. Given that participants within each church are more alike than participants between churches and multiple time points hierarchical models were used. Specifically, multilevel mixed-effects ordered logistic regression models with a fixed church-level intercept and a random participant level intercept were used to explore change between baseline and immediate post-test and baseline and delayed posttest self-efficacy after accounting for the participants' church.

  5. Perception of Stroke Attitude Clustered Within Churches Across Multiple Time Points

    Time frame: 1 week between pretest before 1st workshop and post-test at the end of 2nd workshop and 1 month till the delayed post test

    Stroke attitude is measured by the odds ratio of participant's positive perception of calling 911 for stroke. Odds ratios measure the odds of responses, so higher odds ratios suggest greater odds of stroke attitude change in the post-test compared to pre-test. Stroke attitude questioners were: Q1) If I were to see signs of a stroke, calling 911 would be... (range "extremely pleasant" to "very unpleasant); and Q2) If a person has signs of a stroke, calling 911 right away could be... (range "very helpful" to "very harmful). Given that participants within each church are more alike than participants between churches and multiple time points, hierarchical models were used. Specifically, multilevel mixed-effects ordered logistic regression models with a fixed church-level intercept and a random participant level intercept were used to explore change between baseline and immediate post-test and baseline and delayed post-test stroke attitude after accounting for the participants' church.

Other outcomes

  1. Program Satisfaction

    Time frame: 1 week elapsed between a pretest before 1st workshop and post-test at the end of 2nd workshop

    Program satisfaction is measured by percentage of participants that completed the program who answered on the post test: very satisfied or extremely satisfied on a questionnaire about the program.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Michigan

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2016
First posted
Dec 26, 2011
Registry last updated
Sep 29, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.