Flint, Michigan, 48505, United States
NCT Number: NCT01499173
A Community Partnership to Treat Stroke
Getting to the hospital quickly is the key to treating stroke. African Americans suffer more strokes with worse outcomes and receive stroke treatments less often than European Americans. This project will work to reduce these health disparities by creating and testing the feasibility of a peer-led faith-based behavioral intervention in an African American community with a goal to increase calls to 911 so stroke patients can be treated quickly.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
10 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
Primary location
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
To meet participant eligibility criteria, individuals must be 18 years of age or older (adult intervention) or between 10-17 years of age (youth intervention), a resident of the Flint or greater Flint community, and English speaking.
Exclusion criteria
We will attempt to exclude those who cannot read English because they will not be able to benefit from the intervention materials. These criteria will be confirmed during assessment procedures prior to enrollment.
Treatment and study plan
Stroke Preparedness Intervention
BehavioralA faith-based, scientific theory-driven, peer-led behavioral intervention performed in a group setting in African American churches.
Primary outcomes
-
Completion
Time frame: 1 week
Number of participants who complete the intervention
Secondary outcomes
-
Mean Change in Behavioral Intent to Call 911
Time frame: 1 week elapsed between a pretest before 1st workshop and post-test at the end of 2nd workshop
The pre-test is conducted one week prior to the post-test. A higher score indicates greater behavioral intent. Behavioral intent is measured on a scale of 0 - 8, where 0 indicates no correct answers in responses to scenarios, and 8 indicates appropriate responses (calling 911 every time it is appropriate) to the scenarios presented.
-
Mean Change in Stroke Recognition
Time frame: 1 week elapsed between a pretest before 1st workshop and post-test at the end of 2nd workshop
Stroke recognition was scored on a 0 - 9 point scale where 0 represents no correct answers regarding 9 scenarios and 9 represents perfect stroke recognition.
-
Perception of Social Norms Clustered Within Churches Across Multiple Time Points
Time frame: 1 week between pretest before 1st workshop and post-test at the end of 2nd workshop and 1 month till the delayed post test
Perception of social norms is measured by the odds ratio of the responses to questions of participant agreement with others' influence to calling 911 if he/she were to see a stroke. Odds ratios measure the odds of responses, so higher odds ratios suggest greater odds of the positive change in social norms in the post-test compared to the pre-test. Questions: 1) Most people would call 911 if they were to see a stroke. 2) My family would want me to call 911 if I were to see a stroke. Given that participants within each church are more alike than participants between churches and the multiple time points, hierarchical models were used. Specifically, multilevel mixed-effects ordered logistic regression models with a fixed church-level intercept and a random participant level intercept were used to explore change between baseline and immediate post-test and baseline and delayed post-test social norms after accounting for the participants' church.
-
Perception of Self-efficacy Clustered Within Churches Across Multiple Time Points
Time frame: 1 week between pretest before 1st workshop and post-test at the end of 2nd workshop and 1 month till the delayed post test
Perception of self-efficacy is measured by the odds ratios of the responses to questions of participant confidence in being able to identify and respond appropriately to a stroke. Odds ratios measure the odds of responses, so higher odds ratios suggest greater odds of positive self-efficacy change in the post-test compared to the pretest. Questions asking about self-efficacy were:1) I would be able to tell if someone is having a stroke and 2) I know what to do if I saw someone having a stroke. Given that participants within each church are more alike than participants between churches and multiple time points hierarchical models were used. Specifically, multilevel mixed-effects ordered logistic regression models with a fixed church-level intercept and a random participant level intercept were used to explore change between baseline and immediate post-test and baseline and delayed posttest self-efficacy after accounting for the participants' church.
-
Perception of Stroke Attitude Clustered Within Churches Across Multiple Time Points
Time frame: 1 week between pretest before 1st workshop and post-test at the end of 2nd workshop and 1 month till the delayed post test
Stroke attitude is measured by the odds ratio of participant's positive perception of calling 911 for stroke. Odds ratios measure the odds of responses, so higher odds ratios suggest greater odds of stroke attitude change in the post-test compared to pre-test. Stroke attitude questioners were: Q1) If I were to see signs of a stroke, calling 911 would be... (range "extremely pleasant" to "very unpleasant); and Q2) If a person has signs of a stroke, calling 911 right away could be... (range "very helpful" to "very harmful). Given that participants within each church are more alike than participants between churches and multiple time points, hierarchical models were used. Specifically, multilevel mixed-effects ordered logistic regression models with a fixed church-level intercept and a random participant level intercept were used to explore change between baseline and immediate post-test and baseline and delayed post-test stroke attitude after accounting for the participants' church.
Other outcomes
-
Program Satisfaction
Time frame: 1 week elapsed between a pretest before 1st workshop and post-test at the end of 2nd workshop
Program satisfaction is measured by percentage of participants that completed the program who answered on the post test: very satisfied or extremely satisfied on a questionnaire about the program.
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
University of Michigan
Other
Collaborators
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
Registry information
Important dates
- Study start
- 2014
- Primary completion
- 2015
- Study completion
- 2016
- First posted
- Dec 26, 2011
- Registry last updated
- Sep 29, 2017
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Women's Health Initiative Strong and Healthy Study
NCT02425345
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
View Trial DetailsTemporary Inactivation of Strong Muscle Sensation to Improve Rehabilitation Interventions in SCI
NCT05589402
Bone Diseases, Brain Diseases
Harlingen, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsComparison of the Effects of Mirror Therapy,rTMS and Robotic-assisted Hand Therapy in Stroke Patients
NCT06750692
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Afyonkarahisar, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsImpact of COVID-19 Vaccines on Cerebrovascular Health
NCT04992195
Alzheimer Disease, Arterial Thromboembolism
Hong Kong
View Trial Details