Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02202018

A Cluster Randomized Trial to Assess the Impact of Patient and Provider Education on Use of Home Dialysis

Patients with severe kidney failure require dialysis or transplantation to survive. For those in whom a transplant is not an option, there are two main dialysis options: hemodialysis (either incenter or at home) or home peritoneal dialysis. Home-based therapies (peritoneal and home hemodialysis) are under-utilized in many Canadian jurisdictions with the proportion of home-based therapies varying between 10 and 40% across centres. Studies show that the low use of home dialysis is due to a variety of factors, though patient and provider awareness and knowledge of home dialysis are major factors. In this cluster randomized trial, the investigators will determine whether a standardized modality education program directed at patients, in combination with a provider-directed intervention, can increase the use of home dialysis in incident dialysis patients in Canada.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Background: Patients with severe kidney failure require dialysis or transplantation to survive. For those in whom a transplant is not an option, there are two main dialysis options: hemodialysis (either incenter or at home) or home peritoneal dialysis. Home-based therapies (peritoneal and home hemodialysis) are under-utilized in many Canadian jurisdictions with the proportion of home-based therapies varying between 10 and 40% across centres. The use of home dialysis remains lower than expected due to combination of patient, caregiver, provider, and health system barriers. Previous studies have highlighted several potential patient and caregiver barriers to use of home therapies including knowledge, skills, personal circumstances, and social supports. Provider barriers have been reported to include lack of training in peritoneal dialysis, lack (or perceived lack) in skills and knowledge, bias, and possibly inadequate physician reimbursement for home dialysis.

The Canadian Kidney Knowledge Translation and Generation Network (CANN-NET), a national network of clinicians, researchers and knowledge users that was established to ensure best practices for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), recently created dialysis modality educational tools aimed at patients and kidney health care providers. On behalf of CANN-NET, the investigators propose a cluster randomized controlled trial (with clusters consisting of severe CKD clinics) of a knowledge translation (KT) strategy to increase use of home dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease. Informed by careful survey work, clinics randomized to the knowledge translation intervention will receive patient and provider directed educational tools, including the MATCH D tool, compelling visual aids (infographic, white board animated video, and an educational video on dialysis modality options), audit and feedback, and in-person medical detailing. Control clinics will continue with their usual practice with respect to dialysis modality education.

Primary Objective To determine whether a standardized modality education program directed at patients, in combination with provider-directed interventions can increase the use of home dialysis in incident dialysis patients in Canada

Study Design: A cluster randomized trial of CKD clinics across Canada comparing the efficacy and safety of a KT intervention aiming to increase use of home dialysis in patients with advanced CKD. The unit of observation will be the patient (i.e., outcomes will be measured at the level of an individual patient), and the unit of randomization will be at the level of the multidisciplinary CKD clinic.

Team: The investigative study team includes experts in the clinical epidemiology of CKD and kidney failure, local opinion leaders from every province/region, as well experts in knowledge translation and cluster randomized design. As such, the investigators are well positioned to carry out the proposed study.

Research Significance: Home dialysis, in comparison to incenter hemodialysis, is associated with increased patient independence, better clinical outcomes, and lower health care costs. Due to a variety of factors, home dialysis use remains variable across Canada. This study will test the effectiveness of a KT strategy to increase the use of home dialysis.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Multidisciplinary clinics in Canada that provide care coordinated by a Nephrologist to patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). These clinics have already been identified in a previous survey

Exclusion criteria

-

Treatment and study plan

Active KT intervention

Other
  • Provider & patient-directed infographics educating patients about home dialysis will be displayed in prominent clinic wall space
  • Educational white board presentations promoting home dialysis
  • Each clinic will receive reports outlining their current use of home dialysis in incident ESRD patients compared with provincial & national averages
  • A Canadian version of the MATCH D tool will be provided to clinic staff, to help evaluate patient appropriateness for home dialysis.
  • Each clinic will receive an in-person visit from one of the study investigators/collaborators detailing the benefits of home dialysis, and the educational tools being offered to support care within their clinic.

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Efficacy Outcome: Use of home dialysis

    Time frame: Use of home dialysis at six months after dialysis initiation

    Proportion of patients with incident end-stage renal disease initiating dialysis after the intervention who are using home dialysis (home hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis) six months after dialysis initiation. Use of home dialysis will be ascertained from the clinic clusters and confirmed by linkage with the Canadian Organ Replacement Register (CORR).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary outcome: Use of home dialysis at six months in patients who have been followed by a Nephrologist

    Time frame: Use of home dialysis at six months after dialysis initiation in patients who have been followed by a Nephrologist

    Proportion of patients with incident end-stage renal disease initiating dialysis after the intervention who were followed by a Nephrologist prior to dialysis initiation who are using home dialysis (home hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis) six months after dialysis initiation. Use of home dialysis will be ascertained from the clinic clusters and confirmed by linkage with the Canadian Organ Replacement Register (CORR).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Calgary

Other

Collaborators

  • University of Manitoba

Registry information

Official study title

Patient and Provider Education for Patients With Severe Chronic Kidney Disease: Assessing the Impact on Barriers and Use of Home Dialysis

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2018
First posted
Jul 28, 2014
Registry last updated
Oct 10, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.