Maulana Azad Medical College and Lok Nayak Hospital
Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110002, India
NCT Number: NCT00702871
Objective of this study was to determine incidence, risk factors, etiological micro-organisms and their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern and outcome of VAP; and to study effect of ranitidine vs. sucralfate, used for stress ulcer prophylaxis, on gastric colonization and on occurrence of VAP.
Methods: Design: Prospective randomized study. Setting: ICUs of Medicine Department and Anesthesiology Department, Maulana Azad Medical College and Lok Nayak Hospital, University of Delhi, New Delhi. Patients: 50 patients of age more than 12 years, who had been on ventilator for more than 48 hrs. Intervention: Endotracheal Aspirate and blood sample of all patients were cultured to determine micro-organisms causing VAP and their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern. Patients were divided into 2 groups on random basis. The first group was given ranitidine for stress ulcer prophylaxis while the second was given sucralfate. Thereafter, difference in gastric colonization (on basis of quantitative culture of nasogastric aspirate) and on occurrence of VAP in both the groups was compared.
Study Hypothesis: Study was designed to create data about Ventilator associated pneumonia in developing countries like India. This data is crucial for providing information for deciding future guidelines for treatment of and prevention of Ventilator associated pneumonia. Further to test the hypothesis that H2 blockers, by virtue of raising gastric Ph, increase gastric colonization by pathogenic organism and increase incidence of Ventilator associated pneumonia; patients were divided into two groups on random basis, as described above.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me13 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110002, India
Study population: Fifty patients of either sex admitted to Medical Intensive Care Unit and Intensive Care Unit of Anaesthesiology department of Maulana Azad Medical College and Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi( a 2000 bedded, tertiary care centre), fulfilling the criteria were enrolled and prospectively followed up until one week after discharge from intensive care unit or till death.
Methodology: Ventilator associated pneumonia was diagnosed when new and persistent pulmonary infiltrates (not otherwise explained) appeared on chest radiograph after 48 hours of ventilation and any two of the following three criteria were fulfilled:
Method of collection of samples: Endotracheal aspirate was collected with mucus trap under all aseptic precautions. Nasogastric (NG) aspirate was collected from indwelling NG tubes. After removing the initial 5 ml, the next 10 ml of fluid in the tube was aspirated into a sterile syringe and immediately transported to the laboratory for processing.
Culture method: A Semi quantitative culture of the endotracheal aspirate and nasogastric aspirate was done [6]. A Measured amount of aspirate was plated on blood agar and Mac-Conkey medium and a colony count was done after incubation. A sample of blood was collected in glucose broth and after overnight incubation, subcultures were done on blood agar and Mac-Conkey agar. Colony characteristics were observed and identification was done in accordance with standard recommendations. Susceptibility of the organisms isolated from endotracheal aspirate was done by disc diffusion technique employing the Stokes method.
Grouping of patients: Patients enrolled into study were divided randomly into two groups on random basis. One group was given Ranitidine (H2 blocker) 50 mg I.V. every 8 hourly as stress ulcer prophylaxis while the other group recieved Sucralfate (surface active agent) 1g 6 hourly via nasogastric tube. Occurrence of VAP in each group was recorded and compared. Gastric colonization in each group was monitored by semi-quantitative culture.
Risk factors studied were age, sex, underlying disease, prior respiratory disease including Chronic obstructive airway disease (COPD), prior hospitalization, duration of intubation, numbers of intubations, prior antibiotic therapy etc. Other parameters noted were indication of mechanical ventilation and outcome of patients with VAP Statistical methods: Incidence, risk factors, outcome and antimicrobial susceptibility were calculated in absolute numbers and percentages. Comparison of effect of ranitidine vs. sucralfate on occurrence of VAP was done by chi square test and effect of ranitidine vs. sucralfate on gastric colonization was calculated in absolute numbers and percentages and compared. All statistics were calculated using SPSS software. P value <0.05 was considered significant.
RISK FACTORS studied include age, sex, underlying disease, prior COPD, prior hospitalization, duration of intubation, no. of intubation. Longer duration of dependence on ventilator increased the risk for VAP significantly (p value 0.001). Similarly, reintubation also emerged as clear predisposing factor for VAP (See table 1).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
In arm 1 Ranitidine was given in dose of 50mg i.v. 8 hourly for entire duration of ICU stay.
In arm 2, Sucralfate was given in dose of 1gm via nasogastric tube 6 hourly for entire duration of ICU stay
Time frame: till discharge from ICU or death of Patient
Maulana Azad Medical College
Other
A Clinico-Bacteriological Study and Effect of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis on Occurrence of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia: a Randomized Prospective Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06181669
Bacterial Infections, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Detroit, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07255742
Cross Infection, Disease Attributes
Tanta, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05671328
Aspergillosis, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Lille, France
View Trial DetailsNCT01948635
Critical Illness, Cross Infection
Lille, Nord, France
View Trial Details