Shanghai Changhai Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200433, China
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07010107
This Phase III clinical trial is designed to assess the efficacy and safety of Anaprazole 60 mg once daily (QD) administered over a period of up to 8 weeks, compared with Rabeprazole 20 mg QD, in patients with reflux esophagitis.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200433, China
Location status: Recruiting
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Anaprazole 3 tablets (20 mg/tablet) + Rabeprazole placebo 1 tablet (0.16 g/tablet), administered orally 30-60 minutes before breakfast once daily for up to 8 weeks. After 4 weeks of continuous treatment, if endoscopic evaluation confirms the cure of reflux esophagitis, treatment may be discontinued.
Rabeprazole 1 tablet (20 mg/tablet) + Anaprazole placebo 3 tablets (0.2 g/tablet), orally administered 30-60 minutes before breakfast once daily for up to 8 weeks. After 4 weeks of continuous treatment, if endoscopic evaluation confirms the cure of reflux esophagitis, treatment may be discontinued.
Time frame: Up to 8 weeks
The endoscopic healing rate of reflux esophagitis is defined as the proportion of patients with reflux esophagitis who achieve complete mucosal healing. Complete healing is determined by the absence of mucosal breaks upon endoscopic evaluation post-treatment, and the lesion is classified as normal according to the LA classification.
Time frame: Up to 4 weeks
The endoscopic healing rate of reflux esophagitis is defined as the proportion of patients with reflux esophagitis who achieve complete mucosal healing. Complete healing is determined by the absence of mucosal breaks upon endoscopic evaluation post-treatment, and the lesion is classified as normal according to the LA classification.
Time frame: Up to 8 weeks
The analysis was performed using a symptom assessment questionnaire. On Day 1 of treatment, participants reported their symptoms experienced during the 7 days prior to randomization. On Days 29 and 57 of treatment, and visits for early trial withdrawal, symptom data were recorded based on the completion status of the 7-day diary cards filled out by participants immediately preceding each visit. The severity of heartburn was evaluated using a 4-point scale, while the frequency of occurrence of heartburn was assessed using a 5-point scale.
Time frame: Up to 8 weeks
The analysis was performed using a symptom assessment questionnaire. On Day 1 of treatment, participants reported their symptoms experienced during the 7 days prior to randomization. On Days 29 and 57 of treatment, and visits for early trial withdrawal, symptom data were recorded based on the completion status of the 7-day diary cards filled out by participants immediately preceding each visit. The severity of reflux was evaluated using a 4-point scale, while the frequency of occurrence of reflux was assessed using a 5-point scale.
Time frame: Up to 8 weeks
Standard for evaluating improvement in severity of individual symptoms: Calculate the average severity score for the 7 days prior to the 4-week and 8-week visits separately. The average score = total of individual scores recorded within 7 days / number of recording days.
Time frame: Up to 8 weeks
Standard for evaluating improvement in severity of individual symptoms: Calculate the average severity score for the 7 days prior to the 4-week and 8-week visits separately. The average score = total of individual scores recorded within 7 days / number of recording days.
Time frame: Up to 8 weeks
GERD related quality of life (QoL) is assessed with the "gastroesophageal reflux disease - health related quality of life" (GERD-HRQL) questionnaire. QoL is measured at baseline, Days 29 and 57 of treatment, and visits for early trial withdrawal. The scale contains 10 questions and a symptom control satisfaction survey, which focuses on heartburn, acid reflux, swallowing function, and drug efficacy. Each question is scored according to a 6-point scoring criterion (0 indicates no symptoms, 5 indicates intolerable symptoms, and affects daily activities), and the total score is the sum of the scores of each item (0-50 points in total), with higher scores indicating worse quality of life. Satisfaction is divided into three levels: dissatisfaction, moderate, and satisfaction. Change in GERD-HRQL score = total GERD-HRQL score after treatment - total GERD-HRQL score before treatment.
Time frame: Up to 8 weeks
The treatment-emergent adverse events are evaluated by CTCAE v5.0
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Xuanzhu Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Industry
Efficacy and Safety of Anaprazole in the Treatment of Reflux Esophagitis: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Parallel-Group, Positive-Controlled Phase III Clinical Trial.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06850480
Digestive System Diseases, Duodenal Diseases
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07607067
Barrett Esophagus, Deglutition Disorders
View Trial DetailsNCT02153398
Anastomotic Ulcer (AU), Digestive System Diseases
Bunkyō City, Japan
View Trial DetailsNCT01536080
Deglutition Disorders, Digestive System Diseases
Bundang-gu, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
View Trial Details