ST-1
DeviceST-1 lens worn in daily wear, daily disposable mode.
NCT Number: NCT07345416
This study will enroll 63 eligible subjects (126 eligible eyes, complete at least 108 evaluable eyes) in approximately 6 different medical centers in Taiwan, in order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ST-1 silicone hydrogel daily disposable soft contact lenses (ST-1 lenses) compared to Miru 1day UpSide. Enrolled subjects will be randomized in a 2:1 test to control ratio at Visit 1. Each site will enroll 8 (intended minimum) to 12 (intended maximum) subjects. In order to eliminate the bias, the Investigators and the evaluators will be masked to the treatment assignment of the randomization code. During the study, the Investigator(s) will examine the ocular health via inquiry, slit lamp biomicroscopy (SLB), visual acuity (VA) test, keratometry, and refractive changes. The Investigator(s) will check ocular health and evaluate the inclusion/exclusion criteria of subjects at screening. After entering the study, subjects will be required to wear the lenses on a daily basis, record daily wearing time on a diary, return to the study site at scheduled visits for evaluations and complete the self-assessment questionnaire at Visit 2 to Visit 7 (1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months).
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year–40 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Changhua City, Taiwan
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Note: Monovision is defined as a vision correction method for treating presbyopia in which the dominant eye is corrected for distance vision and the non-dominant eye is corrected for near vision.
ST-1 lens worn in daily wear, daily disposable mode.
Miru 1day UpSide lens worn in daily wear, daily disposable mode.
Time frame: Screening, 3 months following enrolment
Assessed using a Tumbling E Series ETDRS® chart.
Time frame: Screening, 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months following enrolment
This questionnaire includes 11 items assessing symptoms during contact lens wear: discomfort, tearing, photophobia, itching, burning, halos, dryness, variable vision, blurred vision, pain, and other (specify if present).
Scale: 0-4 (minimum = 0, maximum = 4), where higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
Grades:
0 = None
Time frame: Screening, 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months following enrolment
This questionnaire includes 5 items assessing lens performance during contact lens wear: insertion comfort, overall comfort, vision, insertion handling, and removal handling.
Scale: 0-5 (minimum = 0, maximum = 5), where higher scores indicate worse performance.
Grades:
【comfort】 0 = Excellent
1 = Very comfortable 2 = Comfortable 3 = Slightly uncomfortable 4 = Very uncomfortable 5 = Causes pain 【vision】 0 = Excellent
0 = Excellent
Time frame: Daily for 3 months after enrollment
Cumulative duration of lens wear throughout the study period, determined from the daily wearing time recorded by participants in the electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) diary.
Time frame: Daily for 3 months after enrollment
Total number of days the study lenses were worn for 8 hours or more, based on the daily wearing time entered by participants in the electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) diary. A wearing day is defined as a day with 8 hours or more of lens wear.
Time frame: Daily for 3 months after enrollment
Average duration of lens wear for each individual application, derived from the wearing data entered by participants in the electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) diary.
Time frame: Daily for 3 months after enrollment
Average number of hours the study lenses were worn per day, as recorded by participants in the electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) diary.
Time frame: Screening, 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months following enrolment
Assessed using a Tumbling E Series ETDRS® chart.
Time frame: Screening, 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months following enrolment
Assessed using a slit lamp.
Time frame: Screening, 3 months following enrolment
To evaluate the absolute change from baseline in keratometry readings between Screening and the 3 months visit.
Time frame: Screening, 3 months following enrolment
To evaluate the percent change from baseline in keratometry readings between Screening and the 3-month visit.
Time frame: Screening, 3 months following enrolment
To evaluate the absolute change from baseline in refractive parameters, including sphere (S), cylinder (C), and axis (A), measured by subjective refraction test between Screening and the 3-month visit.
Time frame: Screening, 3 months following enrolment
To evaluate the percent change from baseline in refractive parameters, including sphere (S), cylinder (C), and axis (A), measured by subjective refraction test between Screening and the 3-month visit.
Time frame: Screening, 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months following enrolment
AE will be evaluated by the investigator.
Time frame: 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months following enrolment
Lens fitting will be assessed with a slit lamp, and surface assessment will be assessed with a slit lamp or a stereomicroscope.
Time frame: 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months following enrolment
A device deficiency refers to any inadequacy of the investigational product regarding identity, quality, durability, reliability, safety, or performance, including malfunctions, use errors, and labeling issues.
Categories include:
Failure to meet product specifications (e.g., incorrect lens power/diameter/base curve/color) Lens cloudy or surface/edge defect Torn lens during handling/in pack Packaging deficit (e.g., mislabeled product, tampered seal, leaking container) Suspect contamination Lack of performance (e.g., fit changes under hypobaric or low-humidity conditions) Other
If such an event occurs, investigators must evaluate, record, and report all deficiencies and malfunctions during the trial using the device deficiency evaluation form.
The frequency of device deficiencies will be summarized for safety evaluation and compared between treatments.
Time frame: Daily for 3 months after enrollment
Permanent discontinuation of lens wear, if it occurs, will be recorded via ePRO. The overall discontinuation rate will be calculated and compared between treatments using Chi-square or Fisher's exact test.
Time frame: Daily for 3 months after enrollment
Reasons for permanent discontinuation (e.g., discomfort, adverse event, convenience), if they occur, will be collected via ePRO, categorized, and tabulated by visit and overall.
Time frame: Daily for 3 months after enrollment
Lens replacement is defined as removal and reapplication of a lens, regardless of whether a new lens is used. If it occurs, all reasons (e.g., sleeping, rest, device deficiency, adverse events, other) will be recorded via ePRO and tabulated by visit and overall.
Time frame: Daily for 3 months after enrollment
Participants will record their daily usage of artificial tears via ePRO, if applicable. The record will include both the frequency of use and the number of drops applied each time.
Menicon Co., Ltd.
Industry
A Randomized, Single-Masked, Active-Controlled, Multi-Center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ST-1 Silicone Hydrogel Daily Disposable Soft Contact Lenses Compared to Miru 1day UpSide
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02347631
Eye Diseases, Myopia
Dallas, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07724210
Eye Diseases, Myopia
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07406906
Eye Diseases, Myopia
Hong Kong
View Trial DetailsNCT07721714
Astigmatism, Eye Diseases
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial Details