Department of Preventive Dentistry, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine
Shanghai, 200011, China
NCT Number: NCT05750745
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the 0.454 percentage (%) weight/weight (w/w) stannous fluoride (SnF2) toothpastes for the relief of dentine hypersensitivity (DH) in China.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Shanghai, 200011, China
This study will be a single center, randomized, controlled, examiner-blind, 3 treatment arm, parallel group design study, stratified by maximum baseline Schiff sensitivity score (of the 2 selected 'test teeth'), with a treatment period of 12 weeks, to investigate the clinical efficacy of a SnF2 toothpaste for the relief of DH in a Chinese population. The SnF2 test dentifrice will be compared to commercialized negative and positive control toothpastes.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Sensodyne Sensitivity & Gum toothpaste is containing 0.454% w/w SnF2.
Crest Cavity Protection Fresh Lime is containing 1150 parts per million (ppm) fluoride as Sodium fluoride (NaF).
Sensodyne Repair and Protect toothpaste is containing 5.0% w/w calcium sodium phosphosilicate (CSPS).
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Schiff sensitivity score was assessed by participant's response to an evaporative (air) stimulus after the stimulation of the 2 test teeth selected at Baseline by the examiner. Participant's response was scored using Schiff sensitivity scale, an examiner-based index, scored immediately following administration of the evaporative (air) stimulus. Score ranged from 0-3 where 0=Participant did not respond to air stimulation; 1=Participant responded to air stimulus but did not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2=Participant responded to air stimulus and requested discontinuation or moved from stimulus; 3=Participant responded to stimulus, considered stimulus to be painful, and requested discontinuation of the stimulus. Higher score indicated worse outcome (more sensitivity). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at indicated timepoint. Baseline was defined as Day 1 value. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in sensitivity.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Tactile sensitivity was assessed for eligible incisor, canine and pre-molar teeth using a constant pressure probe (Yeaple probe). The probe tip was placed perpendicular to the facial surface of tooth and drawn slowly across the exposed dentine. After each application of the stimulus, the participant was asked to indicate whether they experienced any pain or discomfort (yes/no response). The pressure setting with two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold (g). At Baseline, the upper force setting was 20 g. Tactile threshold (g) was derived as the mean value for the two 'Test Teeth' selected by the examiner at Baseline. Higher tactile threshold indicated better outcome (less sensitivity). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the value at indicated timepoint. Baseline was defined as Day 1 value. A positive change from Baseline indicated an improvement in sensitivity.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Evaporative (air) sensitivity was assessed on the facial surfaces of the two test teeth selected by the examiner at Baseline by directing a 1 second application of air from standard dental syringe held perpendicular to tooth surface. Participant's response to the stimulus was evaluated using Schiff sensitivity scale with scores ranging from 0 (Participant did not respond to air stimulation) to 3 (Responded to stimulus, considered stimulus to be painful, requested discontinuation of the stimulus). Participants then rated the intensity of their response to the evaporative (air) stimulus using a 100 mm VAS with scores ranging from 0 mm (No discomfort) to 100 mm (Extreme discomfort; worst imaginable). Higher score indicated worse outcome (higher sensitivity). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the value at indicated timepoint. Baseline was defined as Day 1 value. A negative change from Baseline indicated an improvement in sensitivity.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6
Schiff sensitivity score was assessed by participant's response to an evaporative (air) stimulus after the stimulation of the 2 test teeth selected at Baseline by the examiner. Participant's response was scored using Schiff sensitivity scale, an examiner-based index, scored immediately following administration of the evaporative (air) stimulus. Score ranged from 0-3 where 0=Participant did not respond to air stimulation; 1=Participant responded to air stimulus but did not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2=Participant responded to air stimulus and requested discontinuation or moved from stimulus; 3=Participant responded to stimulus, considered stimulus to be painful, and requested discontinuation of the stimulus. Higher score indicated worse outcome (more sensitivity). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at indicated timepoint. Baseline was defined as Day 1 value. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in sensitivity.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6
Tactile sensitivity was assessed for eligible incisor, canine and pre-molar teeth using a constant pressure probe (Yeaple probe). The probe tip was placed perpendicular to the facial surface of tooth and drawn slowly across the exposed dentine. After each application, the participant was asked to indicate whether they experienced any pain or discomfort (yes/no response). The pressure setting with two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold (g). At Baseline, the upper force setting was 20 g. Tactile threshold (g) was derived as the mean value for the two 'Test Teeth' selected by the examiner at Baseline. Higher tactile threshold indicated better outcome (less sensitivity). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the value at indicated timepoint. Baseline was defined as Day 1 value. A positive change from Baseline indicated an improvement in sensitivity.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6
Evaporative (air) sensitivity was assessed on the facial surfaces of the two test teeth selected by the examiner at Baseline by directing a 1 second application of air from standard dental syringe held perpendicular to tooth surface. Participant's response to the stimulus was evaluated using Schiff sensitivity scale with scores ranging from 0 (Participant did not respond to air stimulation) to 3 (Responded to stimulus, considered stimulus to be painful, requested discontinuation of the stimulus). Participant then rated the intensity of their response to the evaporative (air) stimulus using a 100 mm VAS with scores ranging from 0 mm (No discomfort) to 100 mm (Extreme discomfort; worst imaginable). Higher score indicated worse outcome (higher sensitivity). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the value at indicated timepoint. Baseline was defined as Day 1 value. A negative change from Baseline indicated an improvement in sensitivity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6 and Week 12
Schiff sensitivity score was assessed by participant's response to an evaporative (air) stimulus after the stimulation of the 2 test teeth selected at Baseline by the examiner. Participant's response was scored using Schiff sensitivity scale, an examiner-based index, scored immediately following administration of the evaporative (air) stimulus. Score ranged from 0-3 where 0=Participant did not respond to air stimulation; 1=Participant responded to air stimulus but did not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2=Participant responded to air stimulus and requested discontinuation or moved from stimulus; 3=Participant responded to stimulus, considered stimulus to be painful, and requested discontinuation of the stimulus. Higher score indicated worse outcome (more sensitivity). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at indicated timepoint. Baseline was defined as Day 1 value. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement in sensitivity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6 and Week 12
Tactile sensitivity was assessed for eligible incisor, canine and pre-molar teeth using a constant pressure probe (Yeaple probe). The probe tip was placed perpendicular to the facial surface of tooth and drawn slowly across the exposed dentine. After each application of the stimulus, the participant was asked to indicate whether they experienced any pain or discomfort (yes/no response). The pressure setting with two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold (g). At Baseline, the upper force setting was 20 g. Tactile threshold (g) was derived as the mean value for the two 'Test Teeth' selected by the examiner at Baseline. Higher tactile threshold indicated better outcome (less sensitivity). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the value at indicated timepoint. Baseline was defined as Day 1 value. A positive change from Baseline indicated an improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6 and Week 12
Evaporative (air) sensitivity was assessed on the facial surfaces of the two test teeth selected by the examiner at Baseline by directing a 1 second application of air from standard dental syringe held perpendicular to tooth surface. Participant's response to the stimulus was evaluated using Schiff sensitivity scale with scores ranging from 0(Participant did not respond to air stimulation) to 3(Responded to stimulus, considered stimulus to be painful, requested discontinuation of the stimulus). Participant then rated the intensity of their response to the evaporative (air) stimulus using a 100 mm VAS with scores ranging from 0 mm (No discomfort) to 100 mm (Extreme discomfort; worst imaginable). Higher score indicated worse outcome (higher sensitivity). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the value at indicated timepoint. Baseline was defined as Day 1 value. A negative change from Baseline indicated an improvement in sensitivity.
HALEON
Industry
A 12-Week, Randomised, Controlled, Examiner-blind, Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of a Stannous Fluoride Toothpaste for the Relief of Dentine Hypersensitivity in a Chinese Population
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07317128
Dentin Sensitivity, Stomatognathic Diseases
Wuhan, Hubei, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07352956
Dentin Sensitivity, Stomatognathic Diseases
Chengdu, Sichuan, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06378255
Dentin Sensitivity, Stomatognathic Diseases
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06608368
Dentin Sensitivity, Stomatognathic Diseases
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
View Trial Details