NCT Number: NCT02340078
A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of YVOIRE Volume Plus Versus YVOIRE Volume in Nasolabial Fold Injection
The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HA IDF II plus (with lidocaine) injected in the nasolabial fold compared to HA IDF II (without lidocaine).
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
30 year–60 year
Sex eligibility
Female
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Women aged between 30 and 60
- Those whose wrinkles in the treatment area (nasolabial fold) correspond to Stage 3 or 4 in the 5-stage Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) symmetrically
- Those who were informed on the purpose, method, and effect etc. of this study and signed the informed consent form
- Those who fell under any of the following 3 cases:
- Surgically sterile women
- Women in menopause over 2 years from the last menstruation, aged at least 45
- Among the women meeting neither of a nor b, those who agreed to use at least 2 contraception methods specified below (one of the barrier methods must be included) until 14 days after the last treatment with the investigational device
- Barrier methods: Condom, diaphragm, cervical cap (pessary), spermicide
- Hormonal methods: Pills, injection (depot), skin patch, hormonal implant (Implanon), vaginal ring
- Intrauterine devices (IUDs): Cooper IUD (Loop), hormonal IUD (Mirena)
- Natural methods: Basic body temperature, ovulation period, coitus interruptus, abstinent
Exclusion criteria
- Those with a skin disease (skin infection, eczema, psoriasis, rosacea, herpes etc.) in the lower 2/3 part of the face in which the wrinkle evaluation may be affected
- Patients with a malignant tumor recognized medically important and considered as potentially affecting the clinical study
- Women in pregnancy or lactation
- Those with the bilirubin level exceeding 1.5 times of the upper limit of normal or the ALT/AST level exceeding 2.5 times of the upper limit of normal
- Those with the confirmed infection of syphilis or HIV
- Those who had an anticoagulant therapy or antiplatelet therapy within 2 weeks prior to Visit 1 (screening)
- Those who used a topical preparation (steroid, retinoid) in the facial area within 4 weeks prior to Visit 2 (randomization )
- Those who experienced a deep chemical peeling or a procedure judged as potentially affecting the clinical study within 3 months prior to Visit 2 (randomization)
- Those who experienced a non-permanent filler procedure or a cosmetic surgery in the face within 9 months prior to Visit 2 (randomization)
- Those who had an implantation procedure with a permanent substance (silicone, PAAG, PMMA, CaHA etc.) in the treatment area (nasolabial fold )
- Those currently with a streptococcal disease
- Those with a history of severe allergy or hypersensitivity (anaphylaxis) judged as potentially affecting the clinical study
- Those with a history of hypertrophic scar or keloid
- Those with a history of bleeding disorder
- Those with a hypersensitivity to the investigational device of this clinical study or lidocaine
- Those who refused to agree not to use a local or systemic pain-relieving agent or other pain-relieving method (e.g.: ice pack) from the midnight of the treatment day with the investigational device through the post-measurement of the last VAS pain scale
- Those who had participated in another clinical study within 1 month prior to Visit 1 (screening)
- Those judged by the investigator as ineligible for this clinical study
Treatment and study plan
HA IDF II
DevicePrimary outcomes
-
Proportion of the Subjects With at Least 10mm Difference in VAS Pain Scale Scores Within the Subject (VAS of the Control Device - VAS of the Test Device) Immediately After Treatment With the Investigational Devices
Time frame: Visit 2 (week 0, immediately after treatment)
The degree of pain was evaluated by VAS (Visual Analog Scale), measuring the length from the left and to the mark by the subject in millimeter (mm) unit.
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
LG Life Sciences
Industry
Registry information
Official study title
A Randomized, Multi Center, Double-blind, Active-controlled, Matched Pairs Design Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of HA IDF II Plus Versus HA IDF II in Nasolabial Fold Injection
Important dates
- Study start
- 2013
- Primary completion
- 2015
- Study completion
- 2015
- First posted
- Jan 16, 2015
- Registry last updated
- Jan 23, 2019
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Fractional Laser vs. Ultrasound for Periorbital Wrinkles
NCT01529983
Wrinkles
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsSafety and Efficacy Evaluation of High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Device in Eyebrow Lifting
NCT06724510
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities, Connective Tissue Diseases
Beijing, China
View Trial DetailsSafety and Efficacy Evaluation of the Monopolar Radiofrequency Device for the Improvement of Facial Wrinkles
NCT06657365
Anti-Aging, Facial Wrinkles
Beijing, China
View Trial DetailsSingle-Blind, Investigational Device Exemption Paired-Design, Non-Inferiority Trial With Confirmation for the Assessment of the Efficacy and Safety of a Universal Electrosurgical Device for Temporary Improvement of Mild and Moderate Wrinkles Around Both Eye Corners and Both Cheek Folds
NCT07467811
Wrinkles
Gwangmyeong, Deokan, South Korea
View Trial Details