Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02340078

A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of YVOIRE Volume Plus Versus YVOIRE Volume in Nasolabial Fold Injection

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HA IDF II plus (with lidocaine) injected in the nasolabial fold compared to HA IDF II (without lidocaine).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

30 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women aged between 30 and 60
  • Those whose wrinkles in the treatment area (nasolabial fold) correspond to Stage 3 or 4 in the 5-stage Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) symmetrically
  • Those who were informed on the purpose, method, and effect etc. of this study and signed the informed consent form
  • Those who fell under any of the following 3 cases:
  • Surgically sterile women
  • Women in menopause over 2 years from the last menstruation, aged at least 45
  • Among the women meeting neither of a nor b, those who agreed to use at least 2 contraception methods specified below (one of the barrier methods must be included) until 14 days after the last treatment with the investigational device
  • Barrier methods: Condom, diaphragm, cervical cap (pessary), spermicide
  • Hormonal methods: Pills, injection (depot), skin patch, hormonal implant (Implanon), vaginal ring
  • Intrauterine devices (IUDs): Cooper IUD (Loop), hormonal IUD (Mirena)
  • Natural methods: Basic body temperature, ovulation period, coitus interruptus, abstinent

Exclusion criteria

  • Those with a skin disease (skin infection, eczema, psoriasis, rosacea, herpes etc.) in the lower 2/3 part of the face in which the wrinkle evaluation may be affected
  • Patients with a malignant tumor recognized medically important and considered as potentially affecting the clinical study
  • Women in pregnancy or lactation
  • Those with the bilirubin level exceeding 1.5 times of the upper limit of normal or the ALT/AST level exceeding 2.5 times of the upper limit of normal
  • Those with the confirmed infection of syphilis or HIV
  • Those who had an anticoagulant therapy or antiplatelet therapy within 2 weeks prior to Visit 1 (screening)
  • Those who used a topical preparation (steroid, retinoid) in the facial area within 4 weeks prior to Visit 2 (randomization )
  • Those who experienced a deep chemical peeling or a procedure judged as potentially affecting the clinical study within 3 months prior to Visit 2 (randomization)
  • Those who experienced a non-permanent filler procedure or a cosmetic surgery in the face within 9 months prior to Visit 2 (randomization)
  • Those who had an implantation procedure with a permanent substance (silicone, PAAG, PMMA, CaHA etc.) in the treatment area (nasolabial fold )
  • Those currently with a streptococcal disease
  • Those with a history of severe allergy or hypersensitivity (anaphylaxis) judged as potentially affecting the clinical study
  • Those with a history of hypertrophic scar or keloid
  • Those with a history of bleeding disorder
  • Those with a hypersensitivity to the investigational device of this clinical study or lidocaine
  • Those who refused to agree not to use a local or systemic pain-relieving agent or other pain-relieving method (e.g.: ice pack) from the midnight of the treatment day with the investigational device through the post-measurement of the last VAS pain scale
  • Those who had participated in another clinical study within 1 month prior to Visit 1 (screening)
  • Those judged by the investigator as ineligible for this clinical study

Treatment and study plan

HA IDF II plus

Device

HA IDF II

Device

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of the Subjects With at Least 10mm Difference in VAS Pain Scale Scores Within the Subject (VAS of the Control Device - VAS of the Test Device) Immediately After Treatment With the Investigational Devices

    Time frame: Visit 2 (week 0, immediately after treatment)

    The degree of pain was evaluated by VAS (Visual Analog Scale), measuring the length from the left and to the mark by the subject in millimeter (mm) unit.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

LG Life Sciences

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized, Multi Center, Double-blind, Active-controlled, Matched Pairs Design Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of HA IDF II Plus Versus HA IDF II in Nasolabial Fold Injection

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
Jan 16, 2015
Registry last updated
Jan 23, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.