NovoBliss Research Pvt.Ltd
Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 382481, India
NCT Number: NCT06486103
A Preliminary Investigation of the Safety and Effectiveness of Oral Probiotics Supplementation for Enhancing Vaginal Health in Females with Mild to Moderate Bacterial Vaginosis: An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Prospective Interventional Proof-of-Science Study.
Total 14 healthy female patients aged 18 to 55 years with mild to moderate bacterial vaginosis will be enrolled to ensure 12 subjects complete the study.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–55 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 382481, India
Potential subjects will undergo screening based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria only after obtaining written informed consent. The subject recruitment department will contact the potential subjects via telephone before the enrolment visit to confirm their participation.
Subjects shall be instructed to visit the facility for the following scheduled visits:
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Take one slow-release capsule twice a day, after meal.
Time frame: On Day 01 (before administration) for baseline, and post-dose on Day 15 (±2 days) and Day 30 (±2 days)
Assessment of the effectiveness of test treatment in terms of change in quality of vaginal discharge using 5 point scoring scale where 0 indicate absent and 4 indicates very intense
Time frame: On Day 01 (before administration) for baseline, and post-dose on Day 15 (±2 days) and Day 30 (±2 days)
Assessment of the effectiveness of test treatment in terms of change in odour of vaginal discharge using 5 point scoring scale where 0 indicate absent and 4 indicates very intense.
Time frame: On Day 01 (before administration) for baseline, and post-dose on Day 30 (±2 days).
Assessment of the effectiveness of test treatment in terms of change in Nugent score where 0-3 indicates normal, 4-6 indicates intermediate bacterial count and 7-10 indicates bacterial vaginosis.
Time frame: On Day 01 (before administration) for baseline, and post-dose on Day 15 (±2 days) and Day 30 (±2 days),
Assessment of the effectiveness of test treatment in terms of change in vaginal pH
Time frame: On Day 01 (before application) for baseline, and post-dose on Day 15 (±2 days) and Day 30 (±2 days).
Assessment of the effectiveness of test treatment in terms of change in VAS score for vaginal itching where 0= indicates no itch and 10 indicates severe itch
Time frame: On Day 15 (±2 days) and Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose.
Assessment of the subject's perception regarding the test treatment using a hedonic scale questionnaire for parameters such as smell, taste, overall palatability, perceived effectiveness.
Time frame: On Day 15 (±2 days) and Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose.
Assessment of safety of test treatment through treatment-emergent adverse events such as burning.
Time frame: On Day 15 (±2 days) and Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose.
Assessment of safety of test treatment through treatment-emergent adverse events such as stinging using scoring scale 0= Indicate absent and 3= severe
Time frame: On Day 15 (±2 days) and Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose.
Assessment of safety of test treatment through treatment-emergent adverse events such as moisture using scoring scale 0= Indicate absent and 3= severe
Time frame: On Day 15 (±2 days) and Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose.
Assessment of safety of test treatment through treatment-emergent adverse events such as flaking using scoring scale 0= Indicate absent and 3= severe
Time frame: On Day 15 (±2 days) and Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose.
Assessment of safety of test treatment through treatment-emergent adverse events such as epithelial mucosa using scoring scale 0= Indicate absent and 3= severe
Time frame: On Day 15 (±2 days) and Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose.
Assessment of safety of test treatment through treatment-emergent adverse events such as redness using scoring scale 0= Indicate absent and 3= severe
Time frame: On Day 15 (±2 days) and Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose.
Assessment of safety of test treatment through treatment-emergent adverse events such as dryness.
Time frame: On Day 15 (±2 days) and Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose.
Assessment of safety of test treatment through treatment-emergent adverse events such as odour using scoring scale 0= Indicate absent and 3= severe
Time frame: On Day 15 (±2 days) and Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose.
Assessment of safety of test treatment through treatment-emergent adverse events such as itching using scoring scale 0= Indicate absent and 3= severe
Time frame: On Day 15 (±2 days) and Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose.
Assessment of safety of test treatment through treatment-emergent adverse events such as soreness of vulva using scoring scale 0= Indicate absent and 3= severe
Time frame: On Day 01 before dosing, and on Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose
Assessment of safety of test treatment through the performance of safety laboratory tests including Haemoglobin
Time frame: On Day 01 before dosing, and on Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose
Assessment of safety of test treatment through the performance of safety laboratory tests including Haematocrit
Time frame: On Day 01 before dosing, and on Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose
Assessment of safety of test treatment through the performance of safety laboratory tests including RBC count
Time frame: On Day 01 before dosing, and on Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose
Assessment of safety of test treatment through the performance of safety laboratory tests including packed cell volume
Time frame: On Day 01 before dosing, and on Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose
Assessment of safety of test treatment through the performance of safety laboratory tests including RBC morphology
Time frame: On Day 01 before dosing, and on Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose
Assessment of safety of test treatment through the performance of safety laboratory tests including mean corpuscular volume
Time frame: On Day 01 before dosing, and on Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose
Assessment of safety of test treatment through the performance of safety laboratory tests including mean corpuscular hemoglobin
Time frame: On Day 01 before dosing, and on Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose
Assessment of safety of test treatment through the performance of safety laboratory tests including mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration
Time frame: On Day 01 before dosing, and on Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose
Assessment of safety of test treatment through the performance of safety laboratory tests including Red blood cell distribution width
Time frame: On Day 01 before dosing, and on Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose
Assessment of safety of test treatment through the performance of safety laboratory tests including Neutrophils
Time frame: On Day 01 before dosing, and on Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose
Assessment of safety of test treatment through the performance of safety laboratory tests including Lymphocytes
Time frame: On Day 01 before dosing, and on Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose
Assessment of safety of test treatment through the performance of safety laboratory tests including Eosinophils
Time frame: On Day 01 before dosing, and on Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose
Assessment of safety of test treatment through the performance of safety laboratory tests including Monocyte
Time frame: On Day 01 before dosing, and on Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose
Assessment of safety of test treatment through the performance of safety laboratory tests including Basophils
Time frame: On Day 01 before dosing, and on Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose
Assessment of safety of test treatment through the performance of safety laboratory tests including Platelet count
Time frame: On Day 01 before dosing, and on Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose
Assessment of safety of test treatment through the performance of safety laboratory tests including mean platelet volume
Time frame: On Day 01 before dosing, and on Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose
Assessment of safety of test treatment through the performance of safety laboratory tests including plateletcrit
Time frame: On Day 01 before dosing, and on Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose
Assessment of safety of test treatment through the performance of safety laboratory tests including Platelet Distribution Width
Time frame: On Day 01 before dosing, and on Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose
Assessment of safety of test treatment through the performance of safety laboratory tests including random blood sugar
Time frame: On Day 01 before dosing, and on Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose
Assessment of safety of test treatment through the performance of safety laboratory tests including Total serum cholesterol
Time frame: On Day 01 before dosing, and on Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose
Assessment of safety of test treatment through the performance of safety laboratory tests including triglyceride
Time frame: On Day 01 before dosing, and on Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose
Assessment of safety of test treatment through the performance of safety laboratory tests including high-density lipoprotein
Time frame: On Day 01 before dosing, and on Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose
Assessment of safety of test treatment through the performance of safety laboratory tests including low-density lipoprotein
Time frame: On Day 01 before dosing, and on Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose
Assessment of safety of test treatment through the performance of safety laboratory tests including Serum Creatinine
Time frame: On Day 01 before dosing, and on Day 30 (±2 days) post-dose
Assessment of safety of test treatment through the performance of safety laboratory tests including Urinalysis
NovoBliss Research Pvt Ltd
Other
A Preliminary Investigation of the Safety and Effectiveness of Oral Probiotics Supplementation for Enhancing Vaginal Health in Females with Mild to Moderate Bacterial Vaginosis: an Open-Label, Single-Arm, Prospective Interventional Proof-of-Science Study.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06438575
Bacterial Infections, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07418918
Bacterial Infections, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Chaozhou, Guangdong, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06985433
Bacterial Infections, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Odense C, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT07247851
Bacterial Infections, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Cairo, Abbasia, Egypt
View Trial Details