A Clinical Study of the ACRYSOF® IQ Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens (IOL)

Visual acuity (VA) was tested monocularly (each eye separately) under photopic (well-lit) conditions using best distance correction adjusted for optical infinity, electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts at a distance of 66 cm from the spectacle plane. DCIVA was measured in logMAR, with 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter or 0.1 logMAR increment corresponding to 5 letters, or 1 line, on an ETDRS chart. A lower numeric value represented better VA. This analysis was prespecified for the first operative eye.

VA was tested monocularly under photopic conditions using the correction obtained from the best correction and no optical infinity adjustment, electronic ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 m from the spectacle plane. VA was measured in logMAR, with 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter or 0.1 logMAR increment corresponding to 5 letters, or 1 line, on an ETDRS chart. A lower numeric value represented better VA. This analysis was prespecified for the first operative eye.

Depth of focus was assessed at 4 meters under photopic (well-lit) conditions using best corrected distance refraction and added defocus. The depth of focus was estimated as the dioptric range between zero defocus and the first point on the negative lens induced mean defocus curve that crosses the 0.2 logMAR using a linear interpolation. A lower numeric value represents better VA. This analysis was pre-specified for the first operative eye. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.

VA was tested monocularly under photopic conditions using best distance correction adjusted for optical infinity, electronic ETDRS charts at a distance of 66 cm from the eye. DCIVA was measured in logMAR, with 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter or 0.1 logMAR increment corresponding to 5 letters, or 1 line, on an ETDRS chart. A lower numeric value represented better VA. This analysis was prespecified for the first operative eye. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or injury, or untoward clinical signs (including abnormal laboratory findings) in subjects, users or other persons, whether or not related to the investigational medical device (test article). Ocular AEs are events localized to the eye. Cumulative and persistent serious adverse events as defined in ISO 11979-7:2014 were collected. This outcome measure was prespecified for the Model DFT015 first and second eyes. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.

Contrast sensitivity (i.e., the ability to detect objects by distinguishing them from their background) was assessed monocularly with the subject's best spectacle correction under mesopic (low, but not quite dark) conditions at a distance of 8 (2.45 m) feet from the eye at a spatial frequency of 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 cycles per degree (cpd) using the Vector Vision CSV 1000-HGT with and without a glare source. Raw scores from contrast sensitivity testing were transformed to log units. A higher numeric value represented better contrast sensitivity. This analysis was prespecified for the first operative eye. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.

VA was tested monocularly under photopic conditions using best distance correction adjusted for optical infinity, electronic ETDRS chart set at 40 cm from the spectacle plane. VA was measured in logMAR, with 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter or 0.1 logMAR increment corresponding to 5 letters, or 1 line, on an ETDRS chart. A lower numeric value represented better VA. This analysis was prespecified for the first operative eye.

The IOLSAT questionnaire assessed the subjective quality of vision with respect to need for spectacles, as well as the subject's expectation and satisfaction with their quality of vision at 6 months. Results are reported consistent with multiple testing strategy.

VA was tested monocularly under photopic conditions with no refractive correction or adjustment for optical infinity, using electronic ETDRS charts at a distance of 66 cm from the spectacle plane. UCIVA was measured in logMAR, with 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter or 0.1 logMAR increment corresponding to 5 letters, or 1 line, on an ETDRS chart. A lower numeric value represented better VA. This analysis was prespecified for the first operative eye. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.

VA was tested monocularly under photopic conditions without refractive correction but with adjustment for optical infinity, electronic ETDRS charts at a distance of 4 m from the eye. +0.25 D spherical power was applied to correct for optical infinity. UCDVA was measured in logMAR, with 0.02 logMAR increment corresponding to a single letter or 0.1 logMAR increment corresponding to 5 letters, or 1 line, on an ETDRS chart. A lower numeric value represented better VA.This analysis was prespecified for the first operative eye. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.

Rates of severe and most bothersome visual disturbances as reported by the subjects on the QUVID questionnaire, a Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) questionnaire. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.