RPh201
DrugRPh201 is a well-defined extract from a botanical source
NCT Number: NCT03462121
This study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, Phase 2 study, with an optional open-label extension, to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of RPh201 in subjects with mild to moderate AD who are eligible for enrollment in this study.
Subject participation will include a Screening Phase, Treatment Phase, and an Optional Open-Label Extension. The Screening Phase will be up to 4 weeks prior to randomization. Both the subject and their study partner(s) will sign an informed consent form (ICF). At Visit 2, Subjects will be randomized 2:1 to RPh201 or placebo. The Treatment Phase will last for 6 months post-randomization, or until subject withdrawal from the study, whichever comes first. The Optional Open-Label Extension will begin once a subject has completed the Treatment Phase and the subject and their study partner(s) have signed an ICF to continue on the study. The Optional Open-Label Extension will continue for 6 months, or until subject withdrawal from the study, whichever comes first. Subjects who do not participate in the Optional Open-Label Extension will be asked to return for an optional post-study visit 6 months after the end of the Treatment Phase.
Subjects may participate in an optional biomarker sub-study. Up to 15 subjects may also participate in an optional FDG-PET sub-study during their study participation. Separate informed consent will be required for both of these sub-studies.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me65 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Kawartha Centre - Redefining Healthy Aging, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
RPh201 is a well-defined extract from a botanical source
Inactive placebo consisting of the therapeutic vehicle
Other names: Cottonseed oil
Time frame: Month 6
The ADAS-Cog is an established general cognitive measure scaled used in clinical trials of AD. The ADAS-Cog assesses multiple performance and cognitive domains including memory, language, praxis, and orientation. Test responses are scored using summed error points where 0 represents no errors and 70 represents errors on all items; higher scores indicate greater cognitive impairment.
Time frame: Month 6
The CDR is a global clinical scale with established diagnostic and severity-ranking utility widely used in clinical trials yielding global and sum of boxes scores (CDR-SB). The CDR global score is used in AD trials as a global measure of disease severity. The CDR is rated based on subject and informant input. The CDR assess three domains of cognition (memory, orientation, judgment/problem solving) and three domains of function (community affairs, home/hobbies, personal care) using semi- structured interviews of both the study subject and a companion/informant carried out by a trained rater and scored using a standard methodology. Each domain is rated on a 5-point scale of functioning as follows: (0) no impairment; (0.5) questionable impairment; (1) mild impairment; (2) moderate impairment; (3) severe impairment (personal care is scored on a 4-point scale without a 0.5 rating available). Higher scores indicate greater impairment.
Time frame: Month 6
Time frame: Month 6
Time frame: Month 6
Chemistry: alkaline phosphatase, albumin, blood urea nitrogen, calcium, chloride, creatinine, glucose (random), inorganic phosphorus, potassium, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, lactate dehydrogenase, sodium, direct bilirubin, total bilirubin, total protein, amylase, uric acid Hematology: haemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count, white blood cell (WBC) count, WBC differential (absolute counts), numerical platelet count Urinalysis: specific gravity, pH, ketones, glucose, nitrite, blood, leukocyte esterase, protein, urobilinogen, bilirubin If nitrite, blood, or protein tests are positive, a microscopic examination will be performed
Time frame: Month 6
Vital signs consist of tympanic temperature, respiratory rate, blood pressure (systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mmHg), and pulse (bpm) after at least 3 minutes rest. Blood pressure will be measured in a sitting or semi-reclined seated position. Weight and height will be captured at Screening and weight will be captured at all other visits where this assessment is performed.
Time frame: Months 3
The ADAS-Cog is an established general cognitive measure scaled used in clinical trials of AD. The ADAS-Cog assesses multiple performance and cognitive domains including memory, language, praxis, and orientation. Test responses are scored using summed error points where 0 represents no errors and 70 represents errors on all items; higher scores indicate greater cognitive impairment.
Time frame: Month 5
The ADAS-Cog is an established general cognitive measure scaled used in clinical trials of AD. The ADAS-Cog assesses multiple performance and cognitive domains including memory, language, praxis, and orientation. Test responses are scored using summed error points where 0 represents no errors and 70 represents errors on all items; higher scores indicate greater cognitive impairment.
Time frame: Month 12
The ADAS-Cog is an established general cognitive measure scaled used in clinical trials of AD. The ADAS-Cog assesses multiple performance and cognitive domains including memory, language, praxis, and orientation. Test responses are scored using summed error points where 0 represents no errors and 70 represents errors on all items; higher scores indicate greater cognitive impairment.
Time frame: Month 3
The CDR is a global clinical scale with established diagnostic and severity-ranking utility widely used in clinical trials yielding global and sum of boxes scores (CDR-SB). The CDR global score is used in AD trials as a global measure of disease severity. The CDR is rated based on subject and informant input. The CDR assess three domains of cognition (memory, orientation, judgment/problem solving) and three domains of function (community affairs, home/hobbies, personal care) using semi- structured interviews of both the study subject and a companion/informant carried out by a trained rater and scored using a standard methodology. Each domain is rated on a 5-point scale of functioning as follows: (0) no impairment; (0.5) questionable impairment; (1) mild impairment; (2) moderate impairment; (3) severe impairment (personal care is scored on a 4-point scale without a 0.5 rating available). Higher scores indicate greater impairment.
Time frame: Month 5
The CDR is a global clinical scale with established diagnostic and severity-ranking utility widely used in clinical trials yielding global and sum of boxes scores (CDR-SB). The CDR global score is used in AD trials as a global measure of disease severity. The CDR is rated based on subject and informant input. The CDR assess three domains of cognition (memory, orientation, judgment/problem solving) and three domains of function (community affairs, home/hobbies, personal care) using semi- structured interviews of both the study subject and a companion/informant carried out by a trained rater and scored using a standard methodology. Each domain is rated on a 5-point scale of functioning as follows: (0) no impairment; (0.5) questionable impairment; (1) mild impairment; (2) moderate impairment; (3) severe impairment (personal care is scored on a 4-point scale without a 0.5 rating available). Higher scores indicate greater impairment.
Time frame: Month 12
The CDR is a global clinical scale with established diagnostic and severity-ranking utility widely used in clinical trials yielding global and sum of boxes scores (CDR-SB). The CDR global score is used in AD trials as a global measure of disease severity. The CDR is rated based on subject and informant input. The CDR assess three domains of cognition (memory, orientation, judgment/problem solving) and three domains of function (community affairs, home/hobbies, personal care) using semi- structured interviews of both the study subject and a companion/informant carried out by a trained rater and scored using a standard methodology. Each domain is rated on a 5-point scale of functioning as follows: (0) no impairment; (0.5) questionable impairment; (1) mild impairment; (2) moderate impairment; (3) severe impairment (personal care is scored on a 4-point scale without a 0.5 rating available). Higher scores indicate greater impairment.
Time frame: Month 3
The ADCS-ADL is an assessment consisting of 23 basic and instrumental ADLs used in mild to moderate AD subjects.7 The scores of the informant-rated assessment are graded against a 78- point scale, with lower scores indicating greater impairment.
Time frame: Month 12
The ADCS-ADL is an assessment consisting of 23 basic and instrumental ADLs used in mild to moderate AD subjects.7 The scores of the informant-rated assessment are graded against a 78- point scale, with lower scores indicating greater impairment.
Time frame: Month 3
The NPI is designed to detect, quantify, and track changes of psychiatric symptoms in a demented population.6 It uses a structured, caregiver-based interview format to assess 10 behavioral domains (delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, dysphoria/depression, anxiety, apathy, irritability, euphoria, disinhibition, and aberrant motor behavior). The same behaviors are then rated on level of severity (1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). The domain total score is the product of the frequency score multiplied by the severity score for that behavioral domain. An NPI total score is obtained by summing all the individual domain total scores.
Time frame: Month 6
The NPI (Appendix 7) is designed to detect, quantify, and track changes of psychiatric symptoms in a demented population.6 It uses a structured, caregiver-based interview format to assess 10 behavioral domains (delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, dysphoria/depression, anxiety, apathy, irritability, euphoria, disinhibition, and aberrant motor behavior). The same behaviors are then rated on level of severity (1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). The domain total score is the product of the frequency score multiplied by the severity score for that behavioral domain. An NPI total score is obtained by summing all the individual domain total scores.
Time frame: Month 12
The NPI (Appendix 7) is designed to detect, quantify, and track changes of psychiatric symptoms in a demented population.6 It uses a structured, caregiver-based interview format to assess 10 behavioral domains (delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, dysphoria/depression, anxiety, apathy, irritability, euphoria, disinhibition, and aberrant motor behavior). The same behaviors are then rated on level of severity (1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). The domain total score is the product of the frequency score multiplied by the severity score for that behavioral domain. An NPI total score is obtained by summing all the individual domain total scores.
Time frame: Month 3
The MMSE is a brief 30-point examination consisting of 11 questions intended to evaluate an adult subject's level of cognition. The MMSE evaluates 6 areas of cognition: orientation, attention, immediate recall, short-term recall, language, and the ability to follow simple verbal and written commands. In addition, it provides a total score allowing the examiner to evaluate the severity of cognitive impairment.
The MMSE will be scored using backward spelling (WORLD) and not serial subtractions. The scoring of WORLD will follow the original Folstein et al (1975)8 instructions for this assessment.
Time frame: Month 6
The MMSE is a brief 30-point examination consisting of 11 questions intended to evaluate an adult subject's level of cognition. The MMSE evaluates 6 areas of cognition: orientation, attention, immediate recall, short-term recall, language, and the ability to follow simple verbal and written commands. In addition, it provides a total score allowing the examiner to evaluate the severity of cognitive impairment.
The MMSE will be scored using backward spelling (WORLD) and not serial subtractions. The scoring of WORLD will follow the original Folstein et al (1975)8 instructions for this assessment.
Time frame: Month 12
The MMSE is a brief 30-point examination consisting of 11 questions intended to evaluate an adult subject's level of cognition. The MMSE evaluates 6 areas of cognition: orientation, attention, immediate recall, short-term recall, language, and the ability to follow simple verbal and written commands. In addition, it provides a total score allowing the examiner to evaluate the severity of cognitive impairment.
The MMSE will be scored using backward spelling (WORLD) and not serial subtractions. The scoring of WORLD will follow the original Folstein et al (1975)8 instructions for this assessment.
Time frame: Month 12
Time frame: Month 12
Time frame: Month 12
Time frame: Month 12
Chemistry: alkaline phosphatase, albumin, blood urea nitrogen, calcium, chloride, creatinine, glucose (random), inorganic phosphorus, potassium, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, lactate dehydrogenase, sodium, direct bilirubin, total bilirubin, total protein, amylase, uric acid Hematology: haemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count, white blood cell (WBC) count, WBC differential (absolute counts), numerical platelet count Urinalysis: specific gravity, pH, ketones, glucose, nitrite, blood, leukocyte esterase, protein, urobilinogen, bilirubin If nitrite, blood, or protein tests are positive, a microscopic examination will be performed
Time frame: Month 12
Vital signs consist of tympanic temperature, respiratory rate, blood pressure (systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mmHg), and pulse (bpm) after at least 3 minutes rest. Blood pressure will be measured in a sitting or semi-reclined seated position. Weight and height will be captured at Screening and weight will be captured at all other visits where this assessment is performed.
Time frame: Month 6
Time frame: Month 12
Time frame: Month 6
18-Fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is a noninvasive, 3-dimensional imaging modality that has become widely used in the management of subjects with malignant lymphomas.9 Up to 15 subjects will participate in an optional FDG-PET sub-study to assess the effect of RPh201 on cerebral glucose metabolism at Baseline and after 6 months of treatment.
Regenera Pharma Ltd
Industry
A 6-Month, Double-Blind, Phase 2 Study and 6-Month Open- Label Extension Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, and Clinical Benefit of RPh201 in Individuals With Alzheimer's Disease With or Without Coexisting Cerebrovascular Disease
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03926520
Aberrant Motor Behavior in Dementia, Agitation,Psychomotor
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06347172
Alzheimer Disease, Brain Diseases
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07306065
Alzheimer Disease, Alzheimers Disease
Orlando, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04992195
Alzheimer Disease, Arterial Thromboembolism
Hong Kong
View Trial Details