Clinical and Translational Science Institute
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States
NCT Number: NCT02132520
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the combination of low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and motor-imagery-based brain computer interface (BCI) training is effective for enhancing motor recovery after stroke.
The PI's hypothesis is that, in comparison with traditional physical therapy alone, subjects receiving supplementary rTMS and BCI training will show greater functional improvements in hand motor ability over time as well as recovery of normal motor connectivity patterns.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States
The goal of the present study is to develop and evaluate a brain based approach to improve motor recovery after stroke, by combining rTMS and BCI training. Treatments will consist of low frequency rTMS applied to the contralesional hemisphere, followed by BCI training to encourage activity within the lesioned hemisphere. The primary objective of this study is to test the main hypothesis above in a stroke patient population. Subjects will also undergo a period of BCI only treatments after completion of the combined rTMS and BCI portion.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Low frequency rTMS (either real or sham) will be applied to the contralesional hemisphere at a rate of 1Hz for 10 minutes.
BCI training will consist of a series of EEG-based motor-imagery tasks with virtual feedback presented on a computer screen.
Time frame: Baseline, Post-Test 1 (3 weeks), Post-Test 2 (6 weeks)
The MRI and functional MRI will evaluate the extent to which cortical areas are recruited both during rest and during movement related tasks. This is quantified by a laterality index, calculated as the ratio of activations of ipsi- and contra-lesional precentral gyri during a paretic hand tracking task. A LI of -1 corresponds to entirely contralesional activation, while a value of +1 corresponds to entirely ipsilesional activation.
Time frame: Baseline, Post-Test 1 (3 weeks), Post-Test 2 (6 weeks)
Performance on the box and block test with the paretic hand, quantified as the number of 2.5 cm^3 cubes grasped, lifted, and released to transfer between compartments correctly within 60 seconds.
Time frame: Baseline, Post-Test 1 (3 weeks), Post-Test 2 (6 weeks)
The finger tracking test evaluates the subject's ability to track an oscillating wave with either their paretic or non-paretic finger. Subjects wore custom electro-goniometer braces on each hand, each of which included a potentiometer signaling extension and flexion of the index finger metacarpophalangeal joint. Subjects were presented with target stimuli with a random sinusoidal waveform and were instructed to move the corresponding index finger to match the target trace as the cursor moved across the screen with constant velocity. Performance was quantified by an accuracy index, calculated using the ratio of the error to the standard deviation of the target, normalized to the range of motion for each subject.
Time frame: Baseline, Post-Test 1 (3 weeks), Post-Test 2 (6 weeks)
Inter-hemispheric Inhibition was evaluated using paired-pulse TMS both for the stroke hemisphere to non-stroke hemisphere direction as well as for the non-stroke hemisphere to the stroke hemisphere direction. IHI was measured by applying TMS to identified left and right motor hotspots at 1 mV threshold intensity, or 130% of the RMT if 1 mV threshold could not be identified, with single unilateral pulses and paired bilateral pulses. IHI was quantified by comparing the paired-pulse peak-to-peak motor evoked potential amplitudes to the corresponding single pulse MEP amplitudes for each direction of stimulation (ipsi- to contra-lesional and contra- to ipsi-lesional).
Time frame: within 12 weeks of participation
The subject report of symptoms assesses whether subject experience any adverse effects as a result of participation in the study.
Time frame: Baseline, Post-Test 1 (3 weeks), Post-Test 2 (6 weeks)
The resting motor threshold is a measure of cortical excitability, and will be recorded for both the stroke and non-stroke hemispheres.
University of Minnesota
Other
A Brain Centered Neuroengineering Approach for Motor Recovery After Stroke: Combined Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Brain-Computer Interface Training
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01573585
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07002463
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Wroclaw, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT05590988
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Hessisch Oldendorf, Lower Saxony, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT02418949
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial Details