Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06424522

A Bowel Management Program (Retrograde Rectal Enema) for the Treatment of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in Rectal Cancer Patients

This clinical trial studies if a bowel management program with a retrograde rectal enema (RRE) for the treatment of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) in rectal cancer patients is better than medical management alone. Rectal cancer treatment can include a procedure where part of the rectum with cancer is removed and the remaining part of the rectum is reconnected to the colon, this is called a low anterior resection of the rectum. LARS is a common condition that can develop after undergoing a low anterior resection of the rectum. LARS consists of any change in how the body performs defecation, the discharge of feces from the body, after undergoing a resection procedure. Patients with LARS may experience fecal urgency, incontinence, increased frequency, constipation, feelings of incomplete bowel movement, or bowel emptying difficulties. Patients may experience individual symptoms of LARS or a combination of them. A bowel management program assists patient's with identifying a specific bowel management regimen that works best for managing symptoms of LARS. A RRE consists of inserting a catheter through the anus into the rectum. The RRE is designed to assist fecal emptying. Medical management of LARS can include the use of fiber, loperamide hydrochloride, or pelvic floor physical therapy. Fiber may help relieve constipation, feelings of incomplete bowel movement, or bowel emptying difficulties. Loperamide hydrocholoride may help lessen fecal urgency, incontinence, or increased frequency. Pelvic floor physical therapy may help restore strength in the rectum possibly helping to improve symptoms of LARS. Participating in a bowel management program with a RRE may be more effective in treating LARS than medical management alone.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Alessandra C. Gasior, DO

CONTACT

[email protected]

614-722-3879

Alessandra C. Gasior, DO

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To compare two approved pathways for treatment of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) - a retrograde enema program versus a medical management pathway.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVE:

I. The determination of feasibility to complete this treatment pathway.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 groups.

GROUP I: Patients undergo a bowel management program comprising a medical management pathway (fiber, loperamide hydrochloride, pelvic floor physical therapy) in combination with RRE treatment for 1 year. Patients use the RRE system to self administer an individualized enema regimen via the rectum. Patients may undergo abdominal film x-rays throughout the trial.

GROUP II: Patients receive medical management comprising fiber, loperamide hydrochloride, and pelvic floor therapy for 1 year. If medical management fails, patients may then be referred for surgery with sacral nerve stimulator placement.

Upon completion of study intervention all patients are followed up at 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Moderate to Severe LARS diagnosis
  • Patients with history of rectal cancer that was treated with proctectomy
  • Has undergone standard medical management without improvement of symptoms for 3-6 months

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients presenting with significant stricture that need a definitive surgical management strategy; patients with minor or clinically negligible strictures can still be candidates. Patients who are able to pass the catheter and the balloon per rectum may be candidates after a digital rectal exam at their initial visit
  • Patients with any chemo or radiation therapy in the last 6 months
  • Patients who currently have colorectal cancer
  • Patients with recurrent colorectal cancer
  • Patients who have undergone a colorectal surgical procedure within the last three months
  • Patients with progressive neurological disease
  • Patients with active or recurrent sacral infection
  • Patients < 18 years old
  • Active sacral nerve simulator
  • Pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the treatment portion of the study
  • Altered mental status or mental disability that would alter ability to self-administer enema
  • Any reason the research team believes the subject is not an appropriate candidate for this study (i.e., transportation issues, history of no-show appointments, lack of reliable communications, vulnerable population(s), etc.)

Treatment and study plan

Dietary fiber

Dietary Supplement

Receive dietary fiber

Other names: Fiber

Enema Administration

Procedure

Undergo RRE

Other names: Enema, Enema Injection

Loperamide hydrochloride

Drug

Receive loperamide hydrochloride

Other names: Imodium, Imodium A-D

physical therapy

Procedure

Undergo pelvic floor physical therapy

Other names: Physiatric Procedure, Physical Medicine Procedure, Physical Therapeutics, Physical Therapy Procedure, Physiotherapy, Physiotherapy Procedure

Questionnaire Administration

Other

Ancillary studies

X-Ray Imaging

Procedure

Undergo abdominal film x-ray

Other names: Conventional X-Ray, Diagnostic Radiology, Medical Imaging, X-Ray, Plain film radiographs, Radiographic Imaging, Radiographic imaging procedure (procedure), Radiography, Static X-Ray, X-Ray

Primary outcomes

  1. Fecal incontinence

    Time frame: Up to 1 year from start of treatment

    Will be measured using a validated scoring tool for LARS (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Bowel Function Instrument Questionnaire [MSKCC BFI]). Effect size (Cohen's d > 0.80) will be computed to ensure the effect of findings. P < 0.05 is considered significant. Statistical analysis will be conducted using linear or nonlinear mixed modelling as found appropriate by the statistician.

  2. Effectiveness assessed using LARS validated scoring tool

    Time frame: Up to 1 year from start of treatment

    Will be assessed using LARS validated scoring tool. Effect size (Cohen's d > 0.80) will be computed to ensure the effect of findings. P < 0.05 is considered significant. Statistical analysis will be conducted using linear or nonlinear mixed modelling as found appropriate by the statistician.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Feasibility measured by Patient Satisfaction Survey

    Time frame: At 1 year from start of treatment

    Will be assessed by administering a patient satisfaction survey post treatment. Effect size (Cohen's d > 0.80) will be computed to ensure the effect of findings. P < 0.05 is considered significant. Statistical analysis will be conducted using linear or nonlinear mixed modelling as found appropriate by the statistician.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

The Ohio State Comprehensive Cancer Center

CONTACT

[email protected]

800-293-5066

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Retrograde Enema Program vs Medical Management

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
May 22, 2024
Registry last updated
Apr 21, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.