Exercise
BehavioralInvolves participants engaging in physical training group sessions in light-to-moderate intensity.
NCT Number: NCT06741878
Frailty is a common clinical syndrome that is becoming increasingly important as populations age worldwide. Individuals who are frail are at a higher risk for negative outcomes, such as falls, disability, hospitalizations, and even death. The understanding of frailty has evolved from a straightforward concept to a complex model that includes physical, psychological, cognitive, and social factors. Since frailty is not static and can change over time, early interventions can be beneficial. Nevertheless, research in this area has been challenging due to a lack of agreement on what frailty encompasses and an inadequate understanding of how its different components interact. Defining frailty as a multidimensional issue is essential to recognize the adverse effects that can arise from medical, psychological, and social influences. However, recent studies have not sufficiently addressed how these different aspects work together or developed effective multidimensional interventions.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified60 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
The study will be designed as a four-arm, double-blinded, cluster-randomised controlled trial. A sample (N = 308) of prefrail older adults aged 60-80 years will be recruited from 32 randomly selected elderly community centres in Hong Kong and classified into four frailty deficit patterns (multi-frailty, physical-to-psycho/social, nonphysical-to-psycho/social, and a robust control). With the hypothesised biopsychosocial framework pinpointing the intertwined relationships of these three domains of frailty, four intervention strategies (biological/psychosocial/nutritional, biological/nutritional, psychosocial/nutritional, and an inactive control) will be proposed to improve their overall frailty, regarding their physical, psychological, and social functioning, nutritional status, and lifestyle changes in a 9-month intervention and follow-up period. The primary objective will be to assess the effectiveness of the intervention strategies for improving the frailty status of participants in each of the four frailty deficit pattern groups, and to determine the most effective intervention strategy.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Involves participants engaging in physical training group sessions in light-to-moderate intensity.
Involves participants engaging in selected board and card games which require cognitive and socialization skills to play in a group setting of 2-4 people.
Involves participants attending dietary classes taught by a certified dietitian, including individualized consultation.
Time frame: Pre-test (1st test): before intervention
The Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI), with three subdomains (physical, psychological, and social), will be used in three evaluation time frames, respectively. The total TFI score ranges from 0 to 15, with a score of 5 (or above) indicating frailty.
Time frame: 2nd test: after 3-month intervention
The Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI), with three subdomains (physical, psychological, and social), will be used in three evaluation time frames, respectively. The total TFI score ranges from 0 to 15, with a score of 5 (or above) indicating frailty.
Time frame: 3rd test: after 6-month follow up
The Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI), with three subdomains (physical, psychological, and social), will be used in three evaluation time frames, respectively. The total TFI score ranges from 0 to 15, with a score of 5 (or above) indicating frailty.
Time frame: Pre-test (1st test): before intervention
Anthropometric data (e.g. BMI in kg/m^2) will be evaluated in 3 time frames, respectively.
Time frame: 2nd test: after 3-month intervention
Anthropometric data (e.g. BMI in kg/m^2) will be evaluated in 3 time frames, respectively.
Time frame: 3rd test: after 6-month follow up
Anthropometric data (e.g. BMI in kg/m^2) will be evaluated in 3 time frames, respectively.
Time frame: Pre-test (1st test): before intervention
Health-related information (heart rate, daily step counts, etc.) collected by a Smart Band will be used in three evaluation time frames, respectively.
Time frame: 2nd test: after 3-month intervention
Health-related information (heart rate, daily step counts, etc.) collected by a Smart Band will be used in three evaluation time frames, respectively.
Time frame: 3rd test: after 6-month follow up
Health-related information (heart rate, daily step counts, etc.) collected by a Smart Band will be used in three evaluation time frames, respectively.
Time frame: Pre-test (1st test): before intervention
The senior physical fitness test battery (SPFT) (Jones, 2013) will be used in three evaluation time frames, respectively. The SPFT consists of six physical tests for assessing functional fitness in the elderly: 30 sec arm curl (muscular strength), 30 sec chair stand (muscular strength), 2 min step test (aerobic endurance), chair sit-and-reach (flexibility), back scratch test (flexibility), and up-and-go (dynamic balance).
Time frame: 2nd test: after 3-month intervention
The senior physical fitness test battery (SPFT) (Jones, 2013) will be used in three evaluation time frames, respectively. The SPFT consists of six physical tests for assessing functional fitness in the elderly: 30 sec arm curl (muscular strength), 30 sec chair stand (muscular strength), 2 min step test (aerobic endurance), chair sit-and-reach (flexibility), back scratch test (flexibility), and up-and-go (dynamic balance).
Time frame: 3rd test: after 6-month follow up
The senior physical fitness test battery (SPFT) (Jones, 2013) will be used in three evaluation time frames, respectively. The SPFT consists of six physical tests for assessing functional fitness in the elderly: 30 sec arm curl (muscular strength), 30 sec chair stand (muscular strength), 2 min step test (aerobic endurance), chair sit-and-reach (flexibility), back scratch test (flexibility), and up-and-go (dynamic balance).
Time frame: Pre-test (1st test): before intervention
A seven-item scale of psychological well-being, which is an indicator of psychological functioning in the Comprehensive Model of Frailty (CMF) (Kwan et al., 2015), will be used in three evaluation time frames, respectively.
Time frame: 2nd test: after 3-month intervention
A seven-item scale of psychological well-being, which is an indicator of psychological functioning in the Comprehensive Model of Frailty (CMF) (Kwan et al., 2015), will be used in three evaluation time frames, respectively.
Time frame: 3rd test: after 6-month follow up
A seven-item scale of psychological well-being, which is an indicator of psychological functioning in the Comprehensive Model of Frailty (CMF) (Kwan et al., 2015), will be used in three evaluation time frames, respectively.
Time frame: Pre-test (1st test): before intervention
The risk of social functioning deficits will be tested using the Social Frailty Index (SFI) in three evaluation time frames, respectively.
Time frame: 2nd test: after 3-month intervention
The risk of social functioning deficits will be tested using the Social Frailty Index (SFI) in three evaluation time frames, respectively.
Time frame: 3rd test: after 6-month follow up
The risk of social functioning deficits will be tested using the Social Frailty Index (SFI) in three evaluation time frames, respectively.
Time frame: Pre-test (1st test): before intervention
Scales of physical activity behavioural change, intention/motivation, loneliness, subjective physical health, and health status will be measured using a survey that was used in a previous project (Chow et al., 2022), in three time frames.
Time frame: 2nd test: after 3-month intervention
Scales of physical activity behavioural change, intention/motivation, loneliness, subjective physical health, and health status will be measured using a survey that was used in a previous project (Chow et al., 2022), in three time frames.
Time frame: 3rd test: after 6-month follow up
Scales of physical activity behavioural change, intention/motivation, loneliness, subjective physical health, and health status will be measured using a survey that was used in a previous project (Chow et al., 2022), in three time frames.
Time frame: Pre-test (1st test): before intervention
Assessed using the validated Chinese scales of the Physical Exercise Self-efficacy Scale (PESES), a 5-item instrument with a 4-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 5 to 20. Higher scores shows higher routine physical exercise self-efficacy.
Time frame: 2nd test: after 3-month intervention
Assessed using the validated Chinese scales of the Physical Exercise Self-efficacy Scale (PESES), a 5-item instrument with a 4-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 5 to 20. Higher scores shows higher routine physical exercise self-efficacy.
Time frame: 3rd test: after 6-month follow up
Assessed using the validated Chinese scales of the Physical Exercise Self-efficacy Scale (PESES), a 5-item instrument with a 4-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 5 to 20. Higher scores shows higher routine physical exercise self-efficacy.
Time frame: Pre-test (1st test): before intervention
Assessed using the Nutrition Self-efficacy Scale (NSES) (Schwarzer, 2009; Wong et al., 2020).
Time frame: 2nd test: after 3-month intervention
Assessed using the Nutrition Self-efficacy Scale (NSES) (Schwarzer, 2009; Wong et al., 2020).
Time frame: 3rd test: after 6-month follow up
Assessed using the Nutrition Self-efficacy Scale (NSES) (Schwarzer, 2009; Wong et al., 2020).
Time frame: Pre-test (1st test): before intervention
Assessed by the Mini Nutritional Assessment scale (MNA). The MNA score ranges from 0 to 14, with a higher score indicating better nutritional status.
Time frame: 2nd test: after 3-month intervention
Assessed by the Mini Nutritional Assessment scale (MNA). The MNA score ranges from 0 to 14, with a higher score indicating better nutritional status.
Time frame: 3rd test: after 6-month follow up
Assessed by the Mini Nutritional Assessment scale (MNA). The MNA score ranges from 0 to 14, with a higher score indicating better nutritional status.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Hong Kong Baptist University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07732478
Atrophy, Frailty
Granada, Andalusia, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT07165574
Anticholinergic Syndrome, Chemically-Induced Disorders
Aalborg, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT07144072
Frailty, Frailty in Older Adults
View Trial DetailsNCT06942182
Atrophy, Femoral Fractures
View Trial Details