Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01086033

A 3-year Study Following up Patients With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated With Humira in Greece

The objectives of the study are to observe and assess the long-term use, safety and efficacy of Humira (adalimumab), as prescribed by the rheumatologist in a normal clinical setting and in accordance with the terms of the European marketing authorization and to observe compliance of patients with the prescribed treatment.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 30116, A. Glyfada, Greece

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This is a multi-center, uncontrolled observational study of patients who at the time of entry had moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RΑ) and who were subsequently prescribed Humira (adalimumab) following normal clinical practice, with or without other anti-rheumatic treatments, prior to enrollment in this study.

Once the physician has determined that the patient meets the inclusion criteria, and the patient has agreed to be included in the observational study by signing the informed consent, the patient's Day 1 demographic data, and disease status will be reported in the Day 1 Data Report Forms. The physician will then follow-up with the patient via regular office visits at intervals as determined by routine clinical practice. Patient's safety and efficacy data, if they are part of clinical routine, will be recorded in the Data Report Forms at Day 1, and regular visits which are closest to Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Month 30, and Month 36.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with moderate or severe active rheumatoid arthritis, who have been prescribed and are receiving Humira (adalimumab) under normal clinical practice for at least one month prior to inclusion and according to the approved Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) in the European Union.
  • Patients must be willing to consent to data being collected and provided to Abbott Laboratories.

Exclusion criteria

  • Contraindications according to the SPC.
  • Patients should not participate in another observational Abbott study.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Adverse Events

    Time frame: 3 years

    An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.

    If an adverse event meets any of the following criteria, it is considered a serious adverse event (SAE): Results in death, is life-threatening, results in hospitalization or the prolongation of hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly or a persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is an event that results in a condition that substantially interferes with the activities of daily living of the participant, is an important medical event requiring medical or surgical intervention to prevent a serious outcome, spontaneous abortion or miscarriage experienced by the participant, or an elective abortion performed on the participant.

  2. Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28 Over Time

    Time frame: Baseline and Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36

    The DAS28 is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, C reactive protein, and general health are included in the DAS28 score. Scores on the DAS28 range from 0 to 10. A DAS28 score >5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score <3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score <2.6 indicates clinical remission.

  3. European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response

    Time frame: Baseline and Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36

    A EULAR response reflects an improvement in disease activity and an attainment of a lower degree of disease activity based on the DAS28 score. The DAS28 score ranges from 0-10, with higher scores indicating more disease activity.

    A Good EULAR Response is defined as an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of > 1.2 compared with Baseline and attainment of a DAS28 score of ≤ 3.2.

    A Moderate EULAR Response is defined as either:

    • an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of > 0.6 and ≤ 1.2 from Baseline and attainment of a DAS28 score of ≤ 5.1, or
    • an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of > 1.2 from Baseline and attainment of a DAS28 score of > 3.2.

    No Response is defined as either:

    • an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of ≤ to 0.6, or
    • an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of > 0.6 and ≤ 1.2 and attainment of a DAS28 of > 5.1.
  4. Number of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response

    Time frame: Baseline and Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36

    American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:

    • ≥ 20% improvement in tender joint count;
    • ≥ 20% improvement in swollen joint count; and
    • ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
    • Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]);
    • Acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein [CRP]).
  5. Number of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response

    Time frame: Baseline and Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36

    American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:

    • ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count;
    • ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and
    • ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
    • Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]);
    • Acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein [CRP]).
  6. Number of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 70 Response

    Time frame: Baseline and Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36

    American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met:

    • ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count;
    • ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and
    • ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
    • Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]);
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS);
    • Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]);
    • Acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein [CRP]).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Missed at Least One Dose of Humira

    Time frame: Months 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36

    Compliance to study treatment was measured by the percentage of participants who missed at least one dose of Humira during each time interval between study visits.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A 3-year Post-marketing Observational Study Following up Patients With Moderate to Severe RA Treated With Humira in Greece

Important dates

Study start
2006
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Mar 12, 2010
Registry last updated
Sep 26, 2013

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.