Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07616999

A 20-Year Follow-up of First Episode Psychosis: Longitudinal Effects of Early Treatment Strategies and Relapse

The study aims to address the following questions:

1. Do subgroups defined by early medication choices, relapse, and medication taken over 20 years differ in clinical, cognitive, and functional outcomes? 2. What are the long-term cognitive functioning trajectories, what factors predict these trajectories, and how do they relate to outcomes? 3. What might be the mechanisms behind medication discontinuation and poor long-term outcome, including the roles of multiple relapses and treatment resistance after first-episode psychosis?

Eligible patients will be invited to a one-time face-to-face interview. A trained research assistant will guide the participants through questions about their background, clinical symptoms, daily functioning, cognitive abilities, and psychological well-being.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Department of Psychiatry, Queen Mary Hospital

Hong Kong, China

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Christy Lai-ming Hui, Dr

CONTACT

[email protected]

+852 2255 3064

About this study

Schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders are highly heterogeneous, with long-term outcomes shaped by early treatment decisions. Antipsychotic medications are effective in preventing relapse, but prolonged use carries substantial side effects, and many patients discontinue in real-world settings. Evidence on the long-term impact of early discontinuation remains scarce. This project is a 20-year follow-up of a uniquely well-characterized cohort of 178 individuals with first episode psychosis (FEP), originally enrolled in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of antipsychotic maintenance versus discontinuation after achieving sustained remission (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00334035). At the 10-year follow-up, over 80% of the cohort were successfully reassessed, providing rare insights into long-term outcomes (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01926340).

Eligible participants will be re-contacted for a one-time assessment including structured clinical interviews, cognitive testing, psychosocial and qualitative measures. Retrospective case-note reviews will extract longitudinal data on relapse episodes, medication use, hospitalizations, and available laboratory results.

Data will be analyzed using latent class analysis to identify subgroups, latent growth models for cognitive trajectories, and regression approaches to test predictors and outcomes.

Ethical safeguards include re-consenting all participants, pre screening/ redacting medical records to preserve rater blinding,and strict de-identification of data. This study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and relevant institutional guidelines.

By extending this landmark cohort to 20 years, the study will provide novel evidence to guide personalized treatment decisions and inform policies on long-term antipsychotic use in psychosis.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Participants were individuals who previously participated in a randomized controlled trial investigating medication continuation/discontinuation on relapse during first episode psychosis (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00334035). The trial included specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, detailed as follows:

Inclusion criteria

  • A diagnosis of schizophrenia or non-affective psychosis (schizophreniform disorder, schizoaffective disorder, brief psychotic disorder, or psychosis not otherwise specified) (DSM-IV)
  • Aged 18 to 65 years at the time of original enrolment
  • Had been treated with antipsychotic drugs for at least 12 months
  • No history of relapse or exacerbation or had to be asymptomatic (free of positive symptoms of psychosis) at study entry.

Exclusion criteria

  • A diagnosis of drug-induced psychosis
  • Current treatment with clozapine, with mood stabilizing medications (lithium, valproate or carbamazepine) or with depot medication
  • Had high risk of suicide or violence
  • Inability to provide informed consent at recruitment

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Long-term Clinical Outcome

    Time frame: From enrollment to 20-year follow-up

    Poor clinical outcome is defined categorically as any of: Persistent positive symptoms of psychosis, requirement for clozapine, or death from suicide. A good clinical outcome is defined as meeting none of the above criteria

Secondary outcomes

  1. Long-term Overall Functioning

    Time frame: Assessed for 6 months preceding the follow-up assessment

    Evaluated using the Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS). Lower scores reflect poorer functioning in social and work-related domains, irrespective of psychopathology

  2. Long-term Role Functioning

    Time frame: Assessed for 6 months preceding the follow-up assessment

    Evaluated using the Role Functioning Scale (RFS), which assesses functioning across key domains including work productivity, independent living and self-care, relationships with immediate social networks, and relationships with extended social networks. Higher scores indicate better functioning

  3. Overall Clinical Status

    Time frame: Within 6 months previous to the follow-up assessment

    Evaluated using the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale, a measure of global illness severity and change in condition over time. The scale comprises Severity and Improvement ratings, with higher scores indicating more severe current illness and worsened clinical status over the past six months, respectively

  4. Long-term Psychopathology

    Time frame: Within 6 months previous to the follow-up assessment

    Evaluated using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), which evaluates self-reported symptom severity across positive symptoms, negative symptoms, and general psychopathology domains. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity

  5. Long-term Positive Symptoms

    Time frame: Within 6 months previous to the follow-up assessment

    Evaluated using the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS), which evaluates self-reported symptom severity across domains including hallucinations, delusions, bizarre behavior, and formal thought disorder. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity

  6. Long-term Negative Symptoms

    Time frame: Within 6 months previous to the follow-up assessment

    Evaluated using the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), which evaluates self-reported domains including affective flattening, alogia, avolition-apathy, anhedonia-asociality, and attention-related impairment. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity

  7. Medication Adherence

    Time frame: Within 1 month previous to the follow-up assessment

    Evaluated using the Medication Compliance Questionnaire (MCQ), which includes subscales assessing self-reported medication-taking behaviors and medication-related attitudes. Higher scores indicate better medication adherence and more positive attitudes toward medication

  8. Semantic Memory and Executive Function

    Time frame: Assessed at the follow-up assessment

    Participants engage in a Verbal Fluency Task, where they will be asked to name as many animals as possible within one minute. Outcomes include the counts of correct, repeated, and incorrect responses. Higher numbers of correct responses indicate better cognitive functioning

  9. Verbal Working Memory

    Time frame: Assessed at the follow-up assessment

    Participants engage in a Letter-Number Span Test, where they will be asked to repeat sequences of numbers and letters presented verbally by research staff in forward or backward order. The number of items to be recalled gradually increases throughout the task. Higher scores indicate better working memory performance

  10. Visual Working Memory and Spatial Processing

    Time frame: Assessed at the follow-up assessment

    Participants engage in a Visual Patterns Test, where they will be required to remember and reproduce visually presented geometric patterns after brief exposure. Higher scores indicate better visual memory performance

  11. Stressful Life Events

    Time frame: Within 6 months previous to the follow-up assessment

    The Stressful Life Events (SLE) questionnaire evaluates the number of significant life events experienced (e.g., loss of a loved one, severe financial problems) and the associated level of distress reported by participants. Higher scores indicate greater exposure to stressful events and/or higher levels of distress

  12. Health-Related Quality of Life

    Time frame: Varies according to the individual questionnaire items, ranging from the past 4 weeks to the past 12 months prior to the follow-up assessment

    Evaluated using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), which includes two subscales assessing physical health and mental health across multiple domains (e.g., physical ability in fulfilling role-related tasks, bodily pain, and emotional well-being). Higher scores indicate better perceived health status and quality of life

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Lai Ming Christy Hui, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

852-22554486

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

The University of Hong Kong

Other

Collaborators

  • Research Grants Council, Hong Kong

Registry information

Official study title

Navigating the Longitudinal Effects of Early Treatment Strategies and Relapse on Clinical, Cognitive, and Functional Outcomes: A 20-Year Follow-up of First Episode Psychosis

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
Jun 1, 2026
Registry last updated
Jun 26, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.