insulin degludec/liraglutide
DrugInjected subcutaneously (under the skin) once daily for 104 weeks. Dose individually adjusted.
NCT Number: NCT02501161
This trial is conducted in Africa, Asia, Europe, North America and South America. The purpose is to compare long-term glycaemic control of insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) versus insulin glargine (IGlar) in insulin naïve subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with oral anti diabetics.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Injected subcutaneously (under the skin) once daily for 104 weeks. Dose individually adjusted.
Injected subcutaneously (under the skin) once daily for 104 weeks. Dose individually adjusted.
Time frame: Weeks 0-104 + 7 days follow-up-1 + 30 days follow-up-2
Inadequate glycaemic control and need for treatment intensification was defined as a glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) of 7.0% or greater at 2 consecutive visits from week 26, including week 26 if HbA1c was greater than or equal to 7% at week 12. Time from randomisation to inadequate glycaemic control and need for treatment intensification was analysed using a stratified log-rank test where treatment, baseline HbA1c group and previous OAD treatment were included as strata in the model. The variable "baseline HbA1c group" was a dichotomised baseline HbA1c variable with 2 categories: HbA1c < 8.5% or HbA1c ≥ 8.5% and the variable "previous OAD treatment" was a categorical variable with 2 categories: SU ± OAD(s) (SU users) or OAD(s) (Non-SU users). 25%, median (50%) and 75% percentiles for the cumulative distribution function were obtained from the Kaplan-Meier survival function.
Time frame: Weeks 0-104 + 7 days follow-up-1 + 30 days follow-up-2
Time to HbA1c > 6.5% at 2 consecutive visits is defined as time from randomization to HbA1c > 6.5% at 2 consecutive planned scheduled visits from week 26 (including week 26 if HbA1c was > 6.5% at week 12). Time from randomisation to HbA1c >6.5% at 2 consecutive visits was analysed using a stratified log-rank test where treatment, baseline HbA1c group and previous OAD treatment were included as strata in the model. The variable "baseline HbA1c group" was a dichotomised baseline HbA1c variable with 2 categories: HbA1c < 8.5% or HbA1c ≥ 8.5% and the variable "previous OAD treatment" was a categorical variable with 2 categories: SU ± OAD(s) (SU users) or OAD(s) (Non-SU users). 25%, median (50%) and 75% percentiles for the cumulative distribution function were obtained from the Kaplan-Meier survival function.
Time frame: Week 0, week 26
Change in HbA1c from baseline (week 0) to week 26 is presented.
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Time frame: Week 26, week 104
Insulin dose after 26 and 104 weeks of treatment is presented.
Time frame: Week 26, week 104
Percentage of participants who achieved (yes/no) HbA1c <7.0% at week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Time frame: Week 26, week 104
Percentage of participants who achieved (yes/no) HbA1c <7.0% without weight gain at week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Time frame: Week 26, week 104
Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia was defined as an episode that was severe according to the American Diabetes Association (ADA) classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Percentage of participants who achieved (yes/no) HbA1c <7.0% without treatment-emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes at week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Time frame: Week 26, week 104
Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia was defined as an episode that was severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Percentage of participants who achieved (yes/no) HbA1c <7.0% without treatment-emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes and without weight gain at week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Time frame: Week 26, week 104
Percentage of participants who achieved (yes/no) HbA1c ≤6.5% at week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Time frame: Week 26, week 104
Percentage of participants who achieved (yes/no) HbA1c ≤6.5% without weight gain at week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Time frame: Week 26, week 104
Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is defined as an episode that is severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Percentage of participants who achieved (yes/no) HbA1c ≤6.5% without treatment-emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes at week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Time frame: Week 26, week 104
Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is defined as an episode that is severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Percentage of participants who achieved (yes/no) HbA1c ≤6.5% without treatment-emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes and without weight gain at week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Time frame: Week 26, week 104
Participants measured plasma glucose values using the blood glucose meter at 9 time points: before breakfast, 90 min after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 min after start of dinner, bedtime, at 4:00 am and before breakfast the following day. Self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG)-9-point profile (individual points in the profile) at week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Participants measured plasma glucose values using the blood glucose meter at 9 time points: before breakfast, 90 min after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 min after start of dinner, bedtime, at 4:00 am and before breakfast the following day. Change in SMPG-mean 9-point profile from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Participants measured plasma glucose values using the blood glucose meter at 9 time points: before breakfast, 90 min after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 min after start of dinner, bedtime, at 4:00 am and before breakfast the following day. Change in SMPG-mean postprandial increment over all meals from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in fasting C-peptide (measured in nanomoles per liter [nmol/L]) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in fasting human insulin (measured in picomoles per liter [pmol/L]) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in fasting total cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in fasting low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in fasting high density lipoprotein (HDL)- cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in fasting very low density lipoprotein (VLDL)-cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in fasting triglycerides (measured as mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in fasting free fatty acids (measured as mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline.
Time frame: Weeks 0-26
Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is defined as an episode that is severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Number of treatment-emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes during 26 weeks of treatment is presented.
Time frame: Weeks 0-104
Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is defined as an episode that is severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Number of treatment-emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes during 104 weeks of treatment is presented.
Time frame: Weeks 0-26
Hypoglycaemic episodes (SMPG value ≤3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL)) were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Number of treatment-emergent hypoglycaemic episodes according to ADA during 26 weeks of treatment is presented.
Time frame: Weeks 0-104
Hypoglycaemic episodes (SMPG value ≤3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL)) were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Number of treatment emergent hypoglycaemic episodes according to ADA during 104 weeks of treatment is presented.
Time frame: Weeks 0-26
Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is defined as an episode that is severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Nocturnal hypoglycaemic episodes were episodes occurring between 00:01 and 05.59 both inclusive. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Number of treatment-emergent nocturnal severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes during 26 weeks of treatment is presented.
Time frame: Weeks 0-104
Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia is defined as an episode that is severe according to the ADA classification or BG confirmed by a plasma glucose value <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Nocturnal hypoglycaemic episodes were episodes occurring between 00:01 and 05.59 both inclusive. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Number of treatment-emergent nocturnal severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes during 104 weeks of treatment is presented.
Time frame: Weeks 0-26
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a product, and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an adverse event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product. If the event had onset date before the first day of exposure on trial product and increased in severity during the treatment period and until 7 days after the last drug date, then this event was also considered as a TEAE. Number of TEAEs during 26 weeks of treatment is presented.
Time frame: Week 0 to week 104
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a product, and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A TEAE was defined as an adverse event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product. If the event had onset date before the first day of exposure on trial product and increased in severity during the treatment period and until 7 days after the last drug date, then this event was also considered as a TEAE. Number of TEAEs during 104 weeks of treatment is presented.
Time frame: Baseline (within 12 weeks prior to week 0), week 104
Fundus photography or a dilated fundoscopy was performed at baseline (within 12 weeks prior to week 0) and week 104. The investigator interpreted each eye's (left and right) results and categorised them as: normal, abnormal not clinically significant (NCS) or abnormal clinically significant (CS). Number of participants in each category at baseline and week 104 were presented.
Time frame: Baseline (within 2 weeks prior to week 0), week 104
The electrocardiogram (ECG) was assessed at baseline (within 2 weeks prior to week 0) and week 104. The investigator interpreted the results and categorised them as: normal, abnormal NCS or abnormal CS. Number of participants in each ECG category at baseline and week 104 are presented.
Time frame: Week 0, week 104
Change in urine albumin/creatinine ratio from baseline (week 0) to week 104 is presented.
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in pulse rate from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in biochemistry parameter- creatinine, total bilirubin from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in biochemistry parameter- albumin from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in biochemistry parameters- alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), lipase and amylase from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in sodium, potassium and calcium from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in haemoglobin from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in haematocrit from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in erythrocytes from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in thrombocytes and leukocytes from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in eosinophils from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in neutrophils from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in basophils from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in monocytes from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Change in lymphocytes from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented.
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
The number of participants who reported low, normal and high levels of calcitonin in relation to reference ranges at baseline (week 0), week 26 and week 104 are presented.
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
SF-36 is a 36-item patient-reported survey of patient health that measures the participant's overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL). SF-36v2™ (acute version) questionnaire measured eight domains of functional health and well-being as well as two component summary scores (physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS)). The scores 0-100 (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. A norm-based score of 50 corresponds to the mean score and 10 corresponds to the standard deviation of the 2009 U.S. general population. Change from baseline in the sub-domain scores and component summary (PCS and MCS) scores are presented. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline.
Time frame: Week 0, week 26, week 104
Treatment related impact measures-diabetes (TRIM-D) was developed according to the FDA guidance from 2009 on development of new PRO measures. The questionnaire consists of 5 sub-domains, which are scored according to a 1-5 point scale with a higher score indicating a better health state (less negative impact). Sub-domain scores are calculated by summing across items in the same sub-domain, and the total score is calculated by summing scores from all the sub-domains. The highest possible summed score within a sub-domain ranges from 20 (compliance sub-domain) to 40 (psychological health sub-domain) points and the highest possible total score is 140 points. Change in TRIM-D total score from baseline (week 0) to week 26 and week 104 is presented. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline.
Novo Nordisk A/S
Industry
A Clinical Trial Comparing Long Term Glycaemic Control of Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide (IDegLira) Versus Insulin Glargine Therapy in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Acronym: DUAL™ VIII
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03899883
Diabetes, Diabetes Complications
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04286555
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07524166
Diabete Mellitus, Diabetes
Jiaxing, Zhejiang, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06094920
Albuminuria, CKD
Almelo, Overijssel, Netherlands
View Trial Details