Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not yet recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07841769

Polygenic Embryo Selection

This study will evaluate whether IVF success rates after PRS-based embryo selection differ from those after morphology-based embryo selection, and whether polygenic disease risk correlates with embryo morphology.

Not yet recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

About this study

Conventional IVF involves the use of morphological grading, commonly using Gardner scores, to prioritize embryos for transfer. Morphological grading is a well established method to improve implantation rates, with better morphological scored embryos having a higher success than lower scoring embryos. Morphology-based selection is also employed following preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), which is now used in over 60% of all IVF cycles in the United States.

More recently, polygenic scoring (PRS) of embryos has been introduced to provide additional information on disease risks and trait probabilities, allowing patients to utilize an alternative method of embryo selection. While there is no prospective study evaluating the utility of PRS, longitudinal studies on over 20,000 sibling pairs and on millions of adults have demonstrated significant disease risk reduction.

One common concern over the use of PRS in place of morphology based selection is the potential impact of implantation and delivery rates. For example, in some cases, the embryo with the lowest risk of a disease may not be the best morphology in the cohort of embryos available for transfer. The question of whether genetic based selection results in lower success rates than morphology based selection has not been evaluated in a prospective observational study. Some retrospective data exist in the context of sex selection. For example, patients using PGT-A may decide to transfer an embryo with their preferred sex (male or female) instead of choosing based on morphology alone. One such study indicated no significant difference in delivery rates between sex and morphology based selection. While this outcome remains surprising to many, one factor that is not always considered is that genetic selection does not always lead to transferring an embryo with the worst morphology. However, similar studies have not been published to corroborate these findings.

This study will evaluate whether IVF success rates after PRS based embryo selection are different from morphology based embryo selection and whether polygenic disease risk is correlated with embryo morphology.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Undergoing IVF and PGT at any clinic where Nucleus testing is used.
  • Ability to provide informed consent and HIPAA authorization

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who decline research use of data

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Sustained Implantation Rate

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8-12 weeks

    Ongoing pregnancy rate per embryo transfer at the time of discharge from IVF care

Secondary outcomes

  1. Polygenic Score correlation with Embryo Morphology

    Time frame: Through study completion (3 years)

    Comparison of Disease Risk Scores According to Embryo Morphological Grades

Interested in participating?

Not yet recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Nucleus Genomics Inc.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Prospective Observational Outcome Comparison of Morphology- Versus Polygenic-Based Selection of In Vitro Fertilization-Derived Embryos

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2029
Study completion
2029
First posted
Sep 25, 2026
Registry last updated
Sep 25, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.