Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Enrolling by invitation

NCT Number: NCT07841652

Scapular Stabilization Versus Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Technique in Scapular Dyskinesis

Office workers, typically engaged in administrative or professional roles, are increasingly susceptible to scapular dyskinesis (SD). Poor ergonomic setups at workstations have been identified as a major contributing factor to musculoskeletal discomfort in this population. Scapular stabilization and neuromuscular training have shown efficacy in improving scapular mechanics. However, direct comparisons of these interventions in office worker populations remain limited. To address this knowledge gap, a randomized clinical trial was conducted to directly compare the two treatment approaches. Outcome measures included the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Scapular Assistance Test (SAT), Visual Scapular Dyskinesis Test, digital inclinometer, and digital vernier caliper to determine which method is more effective in reducing pain, disability, and improving ROM, and scapular kinematic and neuromuscular control in office workers with Scapular Dyskinesis.

Enrolling by invitation

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

20 year–55 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Lahore Teaching Hospital

Lahore, Punjab Province, 54782, Pakistan

About this study

Scapular dyskinesis is a common musculoskeletal disorder characterized by abnormal movement or positioning of the scapula (shoulder blade). This condition is commonly associated with prolonged sedentary work, poor ergonomic practices, and sustained postures. Office workers who use computers for prolonged periods are increasingly experiencing neck and shoulder pain. Poor ergonomic setups at workstations have been identified as a major contributing factor to musculoskeletal discomfort in this population. Studies have shown that using a keyboard for 4 to 6 hours per day significantly increases the risk of developing neck and shoulder pain compared with less frequent computer use. Furthermore, many office workers adopt a forward head posture for extended periods, which places stress on the soft tissues of the cervical spine. Prolonged stress can negatively affect shoulder and scapular function, often resulting in alterations in normal scapular movement. Scapular stabilization exercises are designed to improve scapular position and control, while proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) training focuses on coordinated scapular movements and muscle activation. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the effectiveness of scapular stabilization exercises with proprioceptive neuromuscular activation training in office workers with scapular dyskinesis. The primary outcomes of the study include pain and functional disability. Secondary outcomes include shoulder range of motion (ROM), scapular movement, and scapular positioning. The findings of this study may provide evidence regarding the effectiveness of scapular stabilization and proprioceptive neuromuscular activation training for improving pain, shoulder range of motion, functional ability, scapular kinematics and neuromuscular in office workers with scapular dyskinesis.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • • Both male and females
  • White-collar jobbers working ≥4 h/day, 40 h/week; >1 year experience.
  • Pain 4-7/10 (NPRS)
  • Positive Scapular Assistance Test (SAT) and Lateral Scapular Slide Test LSST, confirmed by a physical therapist.

Exclusion criteria

  • • Orthopedic upper-extremity injury in last 3 weeks; prior shoulder/upper-limb surgery.
  • Neurological disorders of neck/upper limb; current participation in upper-limb rehab.
  • Postural deformities (e.g., scoliosis, cervical pathology); pregnancy; conditions preventing scapular testing; history of major trauma (e.g., RTA, spinal disc pathology).

Treatment and study plan

Scapular Stabilization Exercises+ Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation

Other

The group received standard conventional treatment consisting of a moist heating pad applied for 10 minutes, followed by 25 minutes of scapular stabilization exercises and 20 minutes of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation. Treatment was administered three times per week for six weeks.

The scapular stabilization component included prone Y, T, and W raises performed in a prone position, with the arms elevated approximately 10-15 cm while maintaining scapular retraction and depression. Participants performed 3 sets of 10-12 repetitions with a 2-second pause. Scapular push-ups were performed from a prone plank position with active scapular protraction for 3 sets of 8-10 repetitions. Wall-slide elevation with mirror feedback was performed for 3 sets of 12-15 repetitions while maintaining scapular control. Resistance-band rows were performed for 12-15 repetitions. Scapular D1 and D2 PNF patterns were performed with light manual resistance, 3 sets of 8-10 reps with 5-second holds.

Patient engagement through warm-up and Scapular Stabilization exercises

Other

Patients performed low-intensity engagement exercises to improve adherence, relaxation, and patient comfort during rehabilitation sessions. These activities included wall climbing (finger ladder/wall stair exercises), pendulum exercises, shoulder rolls, active shoulder range-of-motion exercises, pectoralis stretching, and thoracic mobility exercises performed within a pain-free range. Application of moist heating pad for 10 minutes. , 20 minutes of patient engagement+25 min scapular stabilization. 3 sessions per week for 6 weeks.

The scapular stabilization exercises included Prone Y/T/W raises performed in prone position, with the arms raised 10-15 cm to create T, Y (thumbs up), and W positions while maintaining scapular retraction and depression. Participants performed 3 sets of 10-12 repetitions, with a 2-second pause. Scapular push-ups were performed from a prone plank position with engaged scapular protraction for 3 sets of 8-10 reps. Wall-slide elevation with mirror feedback.

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain intensity

    Time frame: At baseline, at 3rd week and at 6th week.

    Pain intensity (Numeric Pain Rating Scale, NPRS; 0-10), 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst pain.

  2. Upper extremity functional disability

    Time frame: at baseline, at 3rd week and at 6th week.

    (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire - DASH), Scores range from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates no disability (better function) and 100 indicates the greatest disability (worse function).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Shoulder range of motion (ROM)

    Time frame: at baseline, at 3rd week and at 6th week

    digital inclinometer measuring flexion, abduction, internal rotation, and external rotation

  2. Scapular kinematics

    Time frame: at baseline ,at 3rd week and at 6th week.

    scapular rotation using digital inclinometer; scapular asymmetry using Lateral Scapular Slide Test; static scapular positioning using digital vernier caliper

  3. Neuromuscular control

    Time frame: at baseline, at 3rd week and at 6th week.

    Scapular Assistance Test

  4. Neuromuscular Control

    Time frame: at baseline, 3rd week and at 6th week.

    Scapular Retraction Test

Interested in participating?

Enrolling by invitation

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Lahore

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Scapular Stabilization Exercises Versus Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Technique in Scapular Dyskinesis Among Office Workers

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Sep 25, 2026
Registry last updated
Sep 25, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.