Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07839858

A Study of Real-world Use and Effectiveness of Cytoreductive Strategies for the Treatment of Second-line Polycythemia Vera in France

The aim of this study was to assess which cytoreductive treatments are currently administered in standard practice as second-line therapy to patients with polycythemia vera (PV) in France and to find out the reasons physicians switch treatments. In addition, the research aimed to describe real-world effectiveness of second-line cytoreductive therapies and the occurrence of adverse events of special interest.

Study data were collected from the medical charts of patients who initiated a second-line cytoreductive agent for the treatment of PV and received their first dose between 1 Jan 2022 and 31 Dec 2023.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–99 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Novartis Investigative Site, Bayonne, Bayonne Cedex, France

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female patient diagnosed with PV after 01 Jan 2014 according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria.
  • Patient ≥ 18 years of age at the time of PV diagnosis.
  • Patient who received a first dose of a second-line cytoreductive treatment between 01 Jan 2022 and 31 Dec 2023.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient alive at study initiation who opposed to data use for research purposes.
  • Patient who died before study initiation and who had opposed to data use for research purpose prior to their death.
  • Patient who took part in an interventional clinical trial(s) between 01 January 2022 and 31 December 2023.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Patients per Type of Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment

    Time frame: Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Patients per Type of First-line Cytoreductive Treatment

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Proportion of Patients per Type of Third-line Cytoreductive Treatment

    Time frame: Up to approximately 12 months

  3. Initial Dose of Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment Received for Each Type of Treatment

    Time frame: Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)

  4. Duration of Each Line of Treatment

    Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 12 months

  5. Duration Between PV Diagnosis and Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment Initiation

    Time frame: Baseline

  6. Proportion of Patients With Treatment Interruptions and Dose Modification During Second-line Treatment

    Time frame: Up to approximately 12 months

  7. Proportion of Patients by Number of Dose Modifications During Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment

    Time frame: Up to approximately 12 months

    Dose modifications were categorized as an increase or decrease in dose.

  8. Proportion of Patients Who Permanently Discontinued Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment

    Time frame: Up to approximately 12 months

  9. Proportion of Patients by Reasons for Switching to Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment

    Time frame: Baseline

  10. Proportion of Patients by Reasons for Switching to Third-line Cytoreductive Treatment

    Time frame: Up to approximately 12 months

  11. Proportion of Patients per Type of Concomitant Treatment/Procedure During Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment

    Time frame: Up to approximately 12 months

  12. Proportion of Patients Who had a Bone Marrow Biopsy Following PV Diagnosis and the Timing of Bone Marrow Biopsy in Relation to First-line Cytoreductive Treatment

    Time frame: Baseline

    Timing of bone marrow biopsy was categorized as:

    • Prior to first-line treatment
    • Prior to second-line treatment
  13. Proportion of Patients Who had a Bone Marrow Biopsy Following PV Diagnosis and the Timing of Bone Marrow Biopsy in Relation to Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment

    Time frame: Baseline

    Timing of bone marrow biopsy was categorized as:

    • During second-line treatment
    • After second-line treatment
  14. Proportion of Patients Achieving Hematocrit Control

    Time frame: Approximately 6 months

    Hematocrit control was defined as hematocrit < 45% with the absence of phlebotomy eligibility during the last 3 months.

  15. Proportion of Patients Achieving Clinicohematologic Response

    Time frame: Approximately 6 months

    Proportion of patients achieving clinicohematologic response according to the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) criteria (complete or partial).

    Complete clinicohematologic response was defined by:

    • Hematocrit < 45% without phlebotomies during the last 3 months, and
    • Platelet count ≤ 400 x 10^9/L, and
    • White blood cell count ≤ 10 x 10^9/L, and
    • Normal spleen size evaluated by physical examination and/or by imaging.

    Partial clinicohematologic response was defined by:

    In patients who do not fulfill the criteria for complete response, hematocrit < 45% without phlebotomy for 3 months OR response in 3 of the other criteria.

  16. Proportion of Patients Achieving Symptom Response

    Time frame: Approximately 6 months

    Proportion of patients achieving symptom response according to the ELN criteria. Symptom response is defined as an absolute 10-point improvement in the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form - Total Symptom Score (MPN-SAF TSS).

    The MPN-SAF TSS (or MPN-10) is a validated patient-reported questionnaire that measures symptom burden in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms. The instrument assesses 10 key disease-related symptoms, each scored from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable), generating a total score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater symptom burden, and changes in the score are commonly used to evaluate clinical benefit and treatment response in both clinical practice and clinical trials

  17. Proportion of Patients Achieving Molecular Response

    Time frame: Approximately 6 months

    Proportion of patients achieving molecular response according to the ELN criteria (complete or partial).

    Complete molecular response was defined by the reduction of any specific molecular abnormality to undetectable levels.

    Partial molecular response was defined by:

    • A reduction of ≥ 50% from baseline value in patients with < 50% mutant allele burden at baseline OR
    • A reduction of ≥ 25% from baseline value in patients with ≥ 50% mutant allele burden at baseline.
  18. Proportion of Patients With Occurrence of Disease Progression Events

    Time frame: Up to 6 approximately months

    Disease progression events include acute myeloid leukemia, myelofibrosis, and PV related death.

  19. Proportion of Patients With Occurrence of Thromboembolic or Hemorrhagic Events

    Time frame: Up to 6 approximately months

    Thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events include arterial thrombotic, venous thrombotic, and hemorrhage.

  20. Proportion of Patients by Sex

    Time frame: Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)

  21. Age

    Time frame: Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)

  22. Proportion of Patients With Cardiovascular and Thromboembolic Risk Factors

    Time frame: Baseline

  23. Proportion of Patients With a History of Medical Conditions

    Time frame: Baseline

    Medical conditions include cancer, autoimmune disease, and opportunistic infection.

  24. Proportion of Patients With Other Ongoing Comorbidities

    Time frame: Baseline

  25. Proportion of Patients per Number and Type of Thromboembolic and Hemorrhagic Events Prior to First-line Treatment

    Time frame: Baseline

  26. Proportion of Patients per Number and Type of Thromboembolic and Hemorrhagic Events Between First- and Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment

    Time frame: Baseline

  27. Duration Between Most Recent Thromboembolic or Hemorrhagic Event and Initiation of First and Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment

    Time frame: Baseline

  28. Proportion of Patients by Reason for Initiating First-line Cytoreductive Treatment

    Time frame: Baseline

  29. Proportion of Patients per Type of Pre-specified Emergency Treatment/Procedure Administered Prior to Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment Initiation

    Time frame: Baseline

    Emergency treatments/procedures include antiplatelet drugs, anticoagulants, and phlebotomies.

  30. Proportion of Patients by Number of Phlebotomies Required in the 3 Months Prior to Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment

    Time frame: Within the 3 months preceding Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)

  31. Proportion of Patients by PV Symptoms

    Time frame: Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)

    PV symptoms include splenomegaly, pruritus, fatigue, and bone pain.

  32. MPN-SAF TSS Score

    Time frame: Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)

    The MPN-SAF TSS (or MPN-10) is a validated patient-reported questionnaire that measures symptom burden in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms. The instrument assesses 10 key disease-related symptoms, each scored from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable), generating a total score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater symptom burden, and changes in the score are commonly used to evaluate clinical benefit and treatment response in both clinical practice and clinical trials.

  33. Hemoglobin Level

    Time frame: Within the 3 months preceding Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)

  34. Hematocrit Level

    Time frame: Within the 3 months preceding Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)

  35. Leukocyte Count

    Time frame: Within the 3 months preceding Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)

  36. Platelet Count

    Time frame: Within the 3 months preceding Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)

  37. Proportion of Patients by Type of Mutation

    Time frame: Baseline

  38. Mutant Allele Burden

    Time frame: Baseline

    Mutant allele burden is a molecular measure that quantifies the proportion of cells harboring a specific disease-associated mutation (e.g., JAK2 V617F, CALR, or MPL) within a patient sample. It is usually reported as the variant allele frequency (VAF), representing the percentage of mutant alleles among all alleles analyzed, and serves as an indicator of the size of the malignant clone in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Changes in mutant allele burden may provide insight into the biological activity of the disease and the molecular effects of therapy.

    Mutant allele burden was categorized as ≥ 50% or < 50%.

  39. Proportion of Patients With Pre-specified Adverse Events of Special Interest Occurring After Initiation of the Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

    Pre-specified adverse events of special interest include thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia, infection, weight gain, psychological disorders, nonmelanoma skin cancer, skin disorders, and autoimmune disorders.

Interested in participating?

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Real-world Use and Effectiveness of Cytoreductive Strategies for the Treatment of Second-line Polycythemia Vera: A Multicenter, Retrospective, Non-interventional Study in France

Acronym: VeRavie

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Sep 24, 2026
Registry last updated
Sep 24, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.