Uşak University Faculty of Dentistry
Uşak, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT07836686
This study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiographic success of different antibiotic and vehicle modifications of the Lesion Sterilization and Tissue Repair (LSTR) technique in infected mandibular primary second molars. The study included systemically healthy children aged 4-11 years. Participants were assigned to four treatment groups according to the antibiotic combination (3Mix or 2Mix) and vehicle used [Macrogol-Propylene Glycol (MP) or normal saline (NS)]: 3Mix-MP, 3Mix-NS, 2Mix-MP, and 2Mix-NS. Clinical outcomes were evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment, and radiographic outcomes were evaluated at 6 and 12 months. The clinical and radiographic success of the four LSTR modifications was compared over the 12-month follow-up period.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me4 year–11 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Uşak, Turkey (Türkiye)
This study was conducted to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiographic success of different antibiotic and vehicle modifications of the Lesion Sterilization and Tissue Repair (LSTR) technique in infected mandibular primary second molars.
A total of 64 systemically healthy children aged 4-11 years were included in the study. The cases were assigned to four treatment groups according to the antibiotic combination (3Mix or 2Mix) and the vehicle used [Macrogol-Propylene Glycol (MP) or Normal saline (NS)]. The four treatment groups were 3Mix-MP, 3Mix-NS, 2Mix-MP, and 2Mix-NS.
Following LSTR treatment, clinical evaluations were performed at 3, 6, and 12 months, while radiographic evaluations were performed at 6 and 12 months. Clinical and radiographic findings were assessed at the specified follow-up periods to determine treatment success and to compare the outcomes of the four LSTR modifications over a 12-month follow-up period.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Patients unsuitable for conventional pulpectomy due to poor cooperation. At least 6 months remaining before physiological exfoliation of the affected tooth.
Root resorption not exceeding one-third of the root length. No furcation perforation. Furcation radiolucency not extending to the permanent tooth germ. Sufficient remaining tooth structure for restoration. Parent/legal guardian willing to provide informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
The 3Mix antibiotic powder consisted of metronidazole, ciprofloxacin, and clindamycin mixed in a 1:1:1 ratio. Macrogol and propylene glycol were mixed in a 1:1 ratio to prepare the vehicle. Immediately before application, the antibiotic powder and the vehicle were combined at a 7:1 ratio to form a homogeneous paste, which was used as part of the LSTR treatment.
The 3Mix antibiotic powder consisted of metronidazole, ciprofloxacin, and clindamycin mixed in a 1:1:1 ratio. Normal saline (NS) was used as the vehicle. Immediately before application, the antibiotic powder and normal saline were combined at a 7:1 ratio to form a homogeneous paste, which was used as part of the LSTR treatment.
The 2Mix antibiotic powder consisted of metronidazole and ciprofloxacin mixed in a 1:1 ratio. Macrogol and propylene glycol were mixed in a 1:1 ratio to prepare the vehicle. Immediately before application, the antibiotic powder and the vehicle were combined at a 7:1 ratio to form a homogeneous paste, which was used as part of the LSTR treatment.
The 2Mix antibiotic powder consisted of metronidazole and ciprofloxacin mixed in a 1:1 ratio. Normal saline (NS) was used as the vehicle. Immediately before application, the antibiotic powder and normal saline were combined at a 7:1 ratio to form a homogeneous paste, which was used as part of the LSTR treatment.
Time frame: 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment
Clinical success was defined as the absence of pain or tenderness, swelling or fistula, pathological mobility, and tenderness to percussion. The presence of any of these signs or symptoms was considered clinical failure
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after treatment
Radiographic success was defined as stabilization, reduction, or complete resolution of existing interradicular and periradicular radiolucency, with no development of new radiographic lesions. Failure to meet any of these criteria was considered radiographic failure.
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after treatment
Overall treatment success was defined as fulfillment of both the clinical and radiographic success criteria. A case was considered unsuccessful if either the clinical or radiographic success criteria were not met.
Uşak University
Other
EVALUATION OF THE CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC SUCCESS OF VARIOUS MODIFICATIONS OF THE LESION STERILIZATION AND TISSUE REPAIR TECHNIQUE IN PRIMARY SECOND MOLAR TEETH
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07391124
Aortic Valve Disease, Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT07437612
Dental Pulp Diseases, Dental Pulp Necrosis
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07607028
Dental Pulp Diseases, Dental Pulp Necrosis
Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
View Trial DetailsNCT07434622
Dental Pulp Disease, Dental Pulp Diseases
Istanbul, Fatih, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details