Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not yet recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07835295

REMIfentanil (2 vs. 4 mcg/kg) Facilitated Intubation Without Neuromuscular Blockade Versus Succinylcholine and Rocuronium With Sugammadex for Endotracheal Intubation in Spine Surgery Requiring Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring

The purpose of this research is to compare four commonly used anesthesia medication strategies for placing a breathing tube in patients undergoing spine surgery that requires motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring.

Not yet recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Mayo Clinic

Jacksonville, Florida, 32224, United States

About this study

Specifically, the study will compare two different doses of remifentanil, succinylcholine, and rocuronium followed by sugammadex to determine which approach provides the best conditions for endotracheal intubation while minimizing interference with nerve monitoring. Researchers will also evaluate how these approaches affect blood pressure and heart rate during anesthesia induction, the quality of motor evoked potential monitoring, the need for additional airway interventions or rescue medications, and the occurrence of side effects such as muscle soreness after surgery.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III
  • Scheduled for elective spine surgery (cervical, thoracic, or lumbar) requiring intraoperative MEP monitoring
  • Able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Known or suspected difficult airway (Mallampati class IV, history of difficult intubation, limited mouth opening < 3 cm, limited neck extension)
  • Body mass index (BMI) > 40 kg/m2
  • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to remifentanil, succinylcholine, rocuronium, sugammadex, or propofol
  • Personal or family history of malignant hyperthermia
  • Known or suspected pseudocholinesterase deficiency
  • Conditions predisposing to succinylcholine-induced hyperkalemia (e.g., major burns within the last year, denervation injuries or upper motor neuron lesions within 6 months, severe crush injuries, prolonged immobilization > 72 hours, known hyperkalemia > 5.5 mEq/L)
  • Severe preoperative motor deficit (manual muscle testing ≤ 2/5 in monitored extremities)
  • Neuromuscular disorders (e.g., myasthenia gravis, muscular dystrophy, Guillain-Barre syndrome, prior stroke with residual motor deficits)
  • Severe cardiovascular disease (e.g., ejection fraction < 30%, unstable angina, myocardial infarction within 3 months)
  • Severe bradycardia (heart rate < 50 bpm) or high-grade atrioventricular block without a pacemaker
  • Current use of medications affecting neuromuscular function (aminoglycosides, magnesium infusion, certain antiepileptic meds, etc.)
  • Emergency surgery
  • High aspiration risk (e.g., uncontrolled gastroesophageal reflux disease)
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding

Treatment and study plan

Low-Dose Remifentanil

Drug

Remifentanil 2 mcg/kg intravenous bolus

High-Dose Remifentanil

Drug

Remifentanil 4 mcg/kg intravenous bolus

Succinylcholine

Drug

Succinylcholine 1 mg/kg intravenous bolus

Rocuronium

Drug

Rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg intravenous bolus

Sugammadex

Drug

Sugammadex reversal after intubation

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Clinically Acceptable Intubating Conditions

    Time frame: During the first endotracheal intubation attempt after study drug administration, assessed within approximately 10 minutes after induction of anesthesia

    Clinically acceptable intubating conditions are defined as intubating conditions rated as excellent or good using a standardized intubating conditions assessment. The assessment includes ease of laryngoscopy, vocal cord position and movement, and participant reaction to intubation. Overall intubating conditions are categorized as excellent, good, or poor. Excellent and good conditions will be counted as clinically acceptable, and poor conditions will be counted as not clinically acceptable. The outcome will be reported as the percentage of participants in each arm with clinically acceptable intubating conditions.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Excellent Intubating Conditions

    Time frame: During the first endotracheal intubation attempt after study drug administration, assessed within approximately 10 minutes after induction of anesthesia

    Excellent intubating conditions are defined as all assessed intubating condition domains rated as excellent. Domains include ease of laryngoscopy, vocal cord position and movement, and participant reaction to intubation. The outcome will be reported as the percentage of participants in each arm with excellent intubating conditions.

  2. Percentage of Participants With Successful First-Attempt Endotracheal Intubation

    Time frame: Within 5 minutes after the study drug administration.

    Successful first-attempt endotracheal intubation is defined as successful placement of the endotracheal tube on the first laryngoscopy attempt, confirmed by capnography over four respiratory cycles. The outcome will be reported as the percentage of participants in each arm with successful first-attempt intubation.

  3. Cormack-Lehane Grade of Glottic Visualization grade

    Time frame: During the first laryngoscopy attempt after study drug administration.

    Glottic visualization will be assessed using the Cormack-Lehane grading system. Grades range from 1 to 4, with lower grades indicating better visualization of the glottis and higher grades indicating poorer visualization. The outcome will be reported by grade for each arm.

  4. Intubation Difficulty Scale Score

    Time frame: During endotracheal intubation after study drug administration, assessed within approximately 10 minutes after induction of anesthesia

    Intubation difficulty will be assessed using the Intubation Difficulty Scale. Scores range from 0 to infinity, with 0 indicating an easy intubation and scores greater than 5 indicating difficult intubation. The outcome will be reported as the Intubation Difficulty Scale score for each arm.

  5. Number of Laryngoscopy Attempts

    Time frame: During endotracheal intubation after study drug administration, assessed within approximately 10 minutes after induction of anesthesia

    The number of laryngoscopy attempts required to achieve successful endotracheal intubation will be recorded. The outcome will be reported as the number of attempts for each arm.

  6. Time From Study Drug Administration to Successful Endotracheal Intubation

    Time frame: From study drug administration until successful endotracheal intubation, assessed within approximately 10 minutes after induction of anesthesia

    Time to successful endotracheal intubation is defined as the elapsed time, in seconds, from administration of the assigned study drug to successful endotracheal tube placement confirmed by capnography. The outcome will be reported in seconds for each arm.

  7. Percentage of Participants Requiring Rescue Neuromuscular Blockade

    Time frame: During attempted endotracheal intubation after study drug administration, assessed within approximately 10 minutes after induction of anesthesia

    Rescue neuromuscular blockade is defined as administration of succinylcholine in participants assigned to a remifentanil arm because of poor intubating conditions or unsuccessful intubation after two attempts. The outcome will be reported as the percentage of participants in the remifentanil arms who required rescue neuromuscular blockade.

  8. Percentage of Participants Requiring an Alternative Intubation Technique

    Time frame: During attempted endotracheal intubation after study drug administration, assessed within approximately 10 minutes after induction of anesthesia

    Alternative intubation technique is defined as use of an additional airway technique or device, such as a bougie or different laryngoscope blade, to facilitate endotracheal intubation. The outcome will be reported as the percentage of participants in each arm requiring an alternative intubation technique.

  9. Percentage of Participants With Movement During Intubation

    Time frame: Within 5 minutes after the study drug administration

    Participant movement during intubation will be assessed by the blinded observer and recorded as present or absent. Movement may include diaphragmatic movement, coughing, bucking, or other clinically observable movement during intubation. The outcome will be reported as the percentage of participants in each arm with movement during intubation.

  10. Percentage of Participants Requiring Adjunct Medication to Facilitate Induction or Intubation

    Time frame: From induction of anesthesia through successful endotracheal intubation, assessed within approximately 10 minutes after induction of anesthesia

    Adjunct medication is defined as any additional medication administered to facilitate induction or intubation beyond the assigned study drug and standardized induction regimen. Examples may include midazolam, fentanyl, or lidocaine. The outcome will be reported as the percentage of participants in each arm requiring adjunct medication.

  11. Change in Mean Arterial Pressure

    Time frame: From baseline before induction of anesthesia through successful endotracheal intubation, assessed within approximately 10 minutes after induction of anesthesia

    Mean arterial pressure will be measured using standard intraoperative monitoring. Change from baseline will be calculated as the post-induction or intubation value minus the baseline value recorded before induction of anesthesia. The outcome will be reported for each arm.

  12. Change in Heart Rate

    Time frame: From baseline before induction of anesthesia through successful endotracheal intubation, assessed within approximately 10 minutes after induction of anesthesia

    Heart rate will be measured using standard intraoperative monitoring. Change from baseline will be calculated as the post-induction or intubation value minus the baseline value recorded before induction of anesthesia. The outcome will be reported for each arm.

  13. Percentage of Participants With Hypotension, Bradycardia, or Oxygen Desaturation During Induction and Intubation

    Time frame: From induction of anesthesia through successful endotracheal intubation, assessed within approximately 10 minutes after induction of anesthesia

    Hypotension, bradycardia, and oxygen desaturation occurring during induction and intubation will be recorded according to protocol-defined safety monitoring procedures. The outcome will be reported as the percentage of participants in each arm with one or more of these events.

  14. Percentage of Participants With Intubation-Related Complications

    Time frame: During endotracheal intubation after study drug administration, assessed within approximately 10 minutes after induction of anesthesia

    Intubation-related complications include dental trauma, aspiration, airway trauma, or other clinically documented complications related to endotracheal intubation. The outcome will be reported as the percentage of participants in each arm with at least one intubation-related complication.

  15. Time From Successful Endotracheal Intubation to Acquisition of Baseline Motor Evoked Potentials

    Time frame: From successful endotracheal intubation until acquisition of baseline motor evoked potentials before patient positioning

    Time to baseline motor evoked potential acquisition is defined as the elapsed time, in minutes, from successful endotracheal intubation to acquisition of baseline motor evoked potential signals according to institutional neuromonitoring procedures. The outcome will be reported in minutes for each arm.

  16. Motor Evoked Potential Signal Quality

    Time frame: At baseline neuromonitoring assessment after successful endotracheal intubation and before patient positioning

    Motor evoked potential signal quality will be assessed using neuromonitoring documentation, including signal amplitude and successful detection of baseline signals. The outcome will be reported for each arm using the protocol-specified signal quality variables.

  17. Percentage of Participants With Postoperative Myalgia at 24 Hours

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

    Postoperative myalgia is defined as participant-reported muscle pain after surgery, assessed at approximately 24 hours postoperatively. The outcome will be reported as the percentage of participants in each arm with postoperative myalgia at 24 hours.

  18. Percentage of Participants With Postoperative Myalgia at 48 Hours

    Time frame: 48 hours after surgery

    Postoperative myalgia is defined as participant-reported muscle pain after surgery, assessed at approximately 48 hours postoperatively. The outcome will be reported as the percentage of participants in each arm with postoperative myalgia at 48 hours.

  19. Postoperative Opioid Consumption

    Time frame: From completion of surgery through 48 hours after surgery

    Postoperative opioid consumption will be obtained from the medical record and summarized using the protocol-specified opioid consumption unit or conversion method. The outcome will be reported for each arm over the postoperative assessment period.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Mariel Anne Reyes

CONTACT

[email protected]

904-953-4797

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Mayo Clinic

Other

Registry information

Acronym: REMI-MEP

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2029
First posted
Sep 22, 2026
Registry last updated
Sep 22, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.