Nutrasource Pharmaceutical and Nutraceutical Services, Inc.
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 0B4, Canada
NCT Number: NCT07830862
The goal of this randomised, placebo-controlled trial is to determine the effect of a chewable postbiotic tablet on the oral health of male and female healthy adults under conditions of short term oral-neglect (a short, temporary period during which participants do not perform their usual oral hygiene practices, such as tooth brushing and flossing).
The main questions the study aims to answer are:
1. Does postbiotic ingestion impact dental plaque accumulation, gingival (gum) inflammation, and periodontal health compared with placebo? 2. Does postbiotic ingestion alter the oral microbiome composition compared with placebo?
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 0B4, Canada
Participants will attend clinic visits at the beginning of the study and at weeks 2, 4, and 6. During these visits, examinations will be performed to assess the health of their teeth and gingivae (gums). Saliva and plaque samples will also be collected to investigate how the postbiotic may affect the oral microbiome (the bacteria that naturally live in the mouth).
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
1 tablet to be taken after brushing in the morning and 1 tablet to be taken after brushing in the evening for 6 weeks. Tablets should be chewed until fully dissolved. The active intervention provides 10mg of heat-treated postbiotic per day. The postbiotic is manufactured by heat treatment of a probiotic preparation equivalent to 3.0 × 10^9 CFU.
1 tablet to be taken after brushing in the morning and 1 tablet to be taken after brushing in the evening for 6 weeks. Tablets should be chewed until fully dissolved. The placebo tablet is matched to the active tablet in packaging, appearance, and taste.
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks
The difference between postbiotic and placebo in change from Baseline to Week 4 in dental plaque score as measured by the Turesky Modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (TMQHPI; range: 0 to 5, with lower scores indicating less plaque accumulation and a better outcome).
Time frame: Baseline to Week 2 and Week 6; Week 2 to Week 4 and Week 6; Week 4 to Week 6
Change in dental plaque formation as measured by the Turesky Modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (TMQHPI; range: 0 to 5, with lower scores indicating less plaque accumulation and a better outcome).
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, and 6; Week 2 to Week 4 and Week 6; Week 4 to Week 6
Change in dental calculus formation as measured by the Volpe-Manhold Index (VMI; units: mm, with lower scores indicating less calculus accumulation and a better outcome).
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, and 6; Week 2 to Week 4 and Week 6; Week 4 to Week 6
Change in gingival bleeding assessed by bleeding on probing (BOP), measured using the Ainamo and Bay method and defined as the % of sites with bleeding on probing out of the total number of sites examined (units: %, with range 0 to 100 % and lower percentages indicating a lower prevalence of gingival bleeding and a better outcome).
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, and 6; Week 2 to Week 4 and Week 6; Week 4 to Week 6
Change in participant-reported gingival bleeding, measured using the Gingival Bleeding Self-Assessment Questionnaire (GBSAQ; lower scores indicate less gingival bleeding and a better outcome).
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, and 6; Week 2 to Week 4 and Week 6; Week 4 to Week 6
Change in periodontal health as assessed by full-mouth periodontal charting (six sites per tooth), measuring Probing Pocket Depth (PPD), summarized as the % of sites with PPD ≥ 4 mm and ≥ 5 mm (units: %, range 0 to 100%, with lower percentages indicating a lower prevalence of periodontal pockets and a better outcome).
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, and 6; Week 2 to Week 4 and Week 6; Week 4 to Week 6
Change in periodontal health as assessed by full-mouth periodontal charting (six sites per tooth), measuring gingival recession (units: mm, lower values indicate less gingival recession and a better outcome).
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, and 6; Week 2 to Week 4 and Week 6; Week 4 to Week 6
Change in periodontal health as assessed by full-mouth periodontal charting (six sites per tooth), measuring Clinical Attachment Level (CAL; units: mm, lower values indicate less periodontal attachment loss and a better outcome).
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2, 4, and 6; Week 2 to Week 4 and Week 6; Week 4 to Week 6
Change in gingival inflammation as measured by the Löe-Silness Gingival Index (GI; range 0 to 3, with lower scores indicating lower severity of gingival inflammation and a better outcome).
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4; Week 2 to Week 4 and Week 6; Week 4 to Week 6
To evaluate the effect of the postbiotic compared with placebo on oral microbiome composition, as measured by changes in alpha diversity and beta diversity over time.
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4; Week 2 to Week 4 and Week 6; Week 4 to Week 6
To evaluate the effect of the postbiotic compared with placebo on the abundance of beneficial versus pathogenic oral bacterial species over time. Significant changes will be reported using fold change and adjusted p-values.
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4; Week 2 to Week 4 and Week 6; Week 4 to Week 6
To evaluate the effect of the postbiotic compared with placebo on changes in the abundance of genes within specific functional modules defined by the KEGG database. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) will be performed to determine which modules are enriched by the postbiotic throughout the study. Significant associations will be reported with the Normalized Enrichment score (NES) and adjusted p-values.
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4; Week 2 to Week 4 and Week 6; Week 4 to Week 6
Change in S. mutans counts
Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 2 and 4; Week 2 to Week 4 and Week 6; Week 4 to Week 6
To evaluate the effect of the postbiotic on the abundance of predefined oral bacterial species associated with halitosis compared with placebo. Changes in bacterial abundance over time will be compared between treatment groups.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, and 6
Reports of Adverse Events (AEs)
The Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
Industry
A Randomised, Triple-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Study to Investigate the Effects of a Chewable Postbiotic Tablet on Oral Health in Healthy Adults
Acronym: LOOFAH2
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06120244
Healthy
Hamilton, Montana, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07823764
Healthy
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06507904
Healthy
View Trial DetailsNCT04667013
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Central Nervous System Diseases
View Trial Details