Association of Diet and IBD
NCT07797998
Colitis, Colitis, Ulcerative
Asyut, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT Number: NCT07828886
The goal of this observational study is to learn whether signs of immune aging and frailty can help predict the balance of benefits and risks of advanced therapies in adults aged 60 years or older with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who are starting a new advanced therapy. Treatment will be chosen by the participant's usual clinical team and will not be assigned by the study.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Are baseline immune-aging and frailty characteristics associated with net clinical benefit at 52 weeks, defined as steroid-free clinical remission without serious infection, treatment discontinuation because of adverse events, IBD-related hospitalization, or IBD-related surgery? Can a low-cost combination of clinical and laboratory markers help identify older adults with IBD who are more likely to have favorable or unfavorable outcomes after starting advanced therapy?
Participants will:
Continue the advanced therapy selected as part of their usual clinical care. Complete study assessments of frailty, nutritional status, disease activity, and other health factors.
Have routine and study-related blood tests, including measures related to immune aging such as CD4/CD8 ratio and interleukin-6 (IL-6).
Be followed at approximately baseline, weeks 6, 14, 26, and 52, with longer-term safety follow-up planned to week 104 when feasible.
Have information collected on remission, infections, hospitalizations, surgery, treatment continuation or change, and other health outcomes.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified60 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Older adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) represent a clinically heterogeneous population. Chronological age alone may not adequately reflect physiological reserve, immune competence, frailty, or vulnerability to treatment-related adverse outcomes. Immunosenescence, characterized by age-related changes in immune cell composition and chronic low-grade inflammation, may contribute to differences in both treatment effectiveness and safety among older adults receiving advanced therapies. However, prospective evidence linking clinically accessible markers of immune aging to treatment outcomes in IBD remains limited.
This prospective, multicenter observational cohort study will evaluate older adults with IBD who initiate a new advanced therapy as part of routine clinical care. Treatment selection and subsequent treatment modifications will remain entirely at the discretion of the treating clinicians and participants. The study will characterize participants using complementary domains including immune-aging markers, frailty, nutritional status, comorbidity and polypharmacy, inflammatory disease activity, and treatment exposure. Candidate immune-aging measures include the CD4/CD8 ratio, lymphocyte measures, interleukin-6, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and other routinely available inflammatory and nutritional biomarkers.
The primary analytical objective is to determine whether baseline immunosenescence and frailty phenotypes are associated with the overall balance of effectiveness and safety after initiation of advanced therapy. The study will also assess whether these measures provide prognostic information beyond conventional clinical factors such as age, disease activity, comorbidity burden, and treatment type. Additional analyses will explore heterogeneity across different mechanisms of advanced therapy, relationships between immune aging, frailty, and nutritional status, and differences between elderly-onset IBD and IBD diagnosed earlier in life but treated during older age.
The study is intended to establish a clinically applicable framework for risk stratification in older adults with IBD and to provide prospective data for future studies of individualized treatment strategies based on biological aging and vulnerability rather than chronological age alone.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Planning to initiate, or having initiated within the previous 4 weeks, a new advanced therapy, including vedolizumab, ustekinumab, an anti-TNF agent, a JAK inhibitor, an S1P receptor modulator, or another approved or clinically available advanced therapy.
Active IBD or a clear indication for treatment escalation at the time of advanced therapy initiation.
Availability of core baseline clinical and laboratory assessments required for the study.
Expected ability to complete at least 52 weeks of follow-up. Ability of the participant or legally authorized representative to understand the study and provide written informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
Active severe infection at enrollment, including sepsis, active tuberculosis, uncontrolled viral hepatitis, active cytomegalovirus colitis, or another serious opportunistic infection.
Clinically significant acute infection within 4 weeks before enrollment that may substantially affect baseline immune-aging measurements or short-term safety assessment.
Active malignancy or recent systemic treatment for malignancy, except for adequately treated low-risk cancers as judged by the investigator.
Severe immunodeficiency unrelated to IBD. Expected survival of less than 12 months or another severe end-stage condition likely to interfere with follow-up or interpretation of outcomes.
Inability to obtain core baseline variables within the predefined assessment window.
Continuous use of the same advanced therapy for more than 4 weeks before enrollment.
Participation in another interventional study that may substantially affect treatment effectiveness or safety assessment.
Any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, would make participation inappropriate or compromise follow-up or data quality.
Time frame: 52 Weeks
Percentage of participants achieving net clinical benefit at Week 52. Net clinical benefit is defined as steroid-free clinical remission at Week 52 without any serious infection, discontinuation of the index advanced therapy due to an adverse event, IBD-related hospitalization, or IBD-related surgery during follow-up. Steroid-free clinical remission is defined as a partial Mayo score ≤2 with no individual subscore >1 for ulcerative colitis, or a Harvey-Bradshaw Index ≤4 for Crohn disease, with no systemic corticosteroid use for at least 4 weeks before the Week 52 assessment. Participants with IBD-unclassified will be assessed according to the predominant UC- or CD-like clinical phenotype.
Time frame: 26 Weeks
Percentage of participants achieving steroid-free clinical remission at Week 26. Remission is defined as a partial Mayo score ≤2 with no individual subscore >1 for ulcerative colitis, or a Harvey-Bradshaw Index ≤4 for Crohn disease, with no systemic corticosteroid use for at least 4 weeks before assessment.
Time frame: 52 weeks
Percentage of participants achieving steroid-free clinical remission at Week 52, using the same disease-specific definitions as for the Week 26 assessment.
Time frame: 52 weeks
Percentage of participants who remain on the advanced therapy initiated at baseline at Week 52 without permanent discontinuation because of lack of effectiveness, adverse events, or patient preference. Dose escalation, interval shortening, or re-induction will not be considered treatment discontinuation.
Time frame: From Baseline Through Week 52
Percentage of participants experiencing at least one serious infection, defined as an infection requiring hospitalization, intravenous antimicrobial treatment, being life-threatening, resulting in interruption of advanced therapy, or otherwise meeting criteria for a serious adverse event.
Time frame: From Baseline Through Week 52
Percentage of participants experiencing at least one IBD-related hospitalization during follow-up, including hospitalization related to active IBD, disease complications, infection, intestinal obstruction, bleeding, malnutrition, treatment-related adverse events, or preparation for IBD-related surgery.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 26
The Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Frailty Score is a 28-item IBD-specific frailty assessment. Each item is scored 0 or 1, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 28. Higher scores indicate greater frailty burden and therefore a worse outcome. A total score of ≥4 has been used to classify participants as frail. Change from baseline will be calculated as the Week 26 score minus the baseline score; negative values indicate improvement and positive values indicate worsening.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
The Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Frailty Score is a 28-item IBD-specific frailty assessment. Each item is scored 0 or 1, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 28. Higher scores indicate greater frailty burden and therefore a worse outcome. A total score of ≥4 has been used to classify participants as frail. Change from baseline will be calculated as the Week 52 score minus the baseline score; negative values indicate improvement and positive values indicate worsening.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
The Clinical Frailty Scale is a clinician-rated global frailty measure ranging from 1 to 9, where 1 represents very fit and 9 represents terminally ill. Higher scores indicate greater frailty and therefore a worse outcome. Change from baseline will be calculated as the Week 52 score minus the baseline score; negative values indicate improvement and positive values indicate worsening.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Yingfan Zhang, BSc
CONTACT
Yun Qiu, MD, PhD
CONTACT
First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
Other
Immunosenescence Phenotypes and Net Clinical Benefit of Advanced Therapies in Older Adults With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Prospective Multicenter Observational Cohort Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07797998
Colitis, Colitis, Ulcerative
Asyut, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07590271
Artificial Intelligence (AI), Colitis
Taichung, Xitun Dist., Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT07292454
Colitis, Colitis, Ulcerative
Pointe-à-Pitre, CHU de La Guadeloupe, Guadeloupe
View Trial DetailsNCT07020481
Colitis, Colitis, Ulcerative
View Trial Details