Effectiveness of a Multi-disciplinary Vision Rehabilitation Programme in Improving the Overall Quality of Life of Visually Impaired Adults

General health related quality of life will be measured using the Hong Kong version of the EuroQoL 5-Dimension instrument 5-level (EQ-5D-5L-HK). Five aspects will be meausred including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomport, anxiety/depression. A scale of 1 to 5 will be rated. The participant will also be asked to give an overall score for their health at the time of measurement, which is out of 100, 0 means poorest

Vision-related quality of life will be measured by the Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire 48 (LV VFQ-48). The LV VFQ48 was translated into Traditional Chinese. LV VFQ-48 measures the difficulties in performing daily activities.

Visual function will be measured using the Melbourne Low-Vision ADL Index (MLVAI). It includes 17 functional performance measures and 9 self-reported questions related to real-world daily activities. The original 17-item functional tasks in MLVAI were modified to align with the local context. Item descriptions were translated into Traditional Chinese. The scoring system has been revised to include quantifiable completion time to improve the reliability of performance scoring between assessors. Baseline assessment will collect two types of data: the original performance using habitual glasses and the performance score using a mobile phone (with any assistive functions enabled). The post-intervention assessment will collect performance scores using the advanced assistive technology prescribed to the participants during the intervention (i.e., smart glasses and/or an AI assistant on their mobile phone).

The level of hope is measured by the Herth Hope Index (HHI). This index includes 12 self-reported items, covering three subscales "Sense of temporality and future", "Positive readiness and expectancy", and "Interconnectedness with self and others". Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale, where 1 indicates strongly disagree, and 4 indicates strongly agree. The total score can range from 12 to 48. The higher the score, the greater the level of hope.

Depression severity is measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) . The PHQ-9 comprises nine questions, along with an impact question measuring the extent to which depressive symptoms affect daily functioning. Depression severity is measured over a two-week period. The frequency of the symptoms is rated on a four-point scale, where 0 = "Not at all", 1 = "several days", 2 = "More than half of the days", and 3 = "Nearly every day". The total score can range from 0 to 27. A higher PHQ-9 score indicates higher depressive severity. A cutoff score of 20 or above indicates severe depression.

Severity of anxiety is assessed using the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7). GAD-7 includes seven questions along with one impact question. On a four-level scale, GAD-7 captures the frequency of anxiety symptoms experienced over the past two-week period. Each question is rated on a four-point scale, where 0 = "Not at all", 1 = "Several days", 2 = "More than half the days", 3 = "Nearly every day". The total score can range from 0 to 21. The higher the GAD-7 score, the higher the level of anxiety. A cutoff score of 15 or above indicates a severe level of anxiety.

Balance and mobility function will be measured using the Mini Balance Evaluation System Test (miniBesTest). This is a 14-item assessment. Each item is scored on a three-point ordinal scale, with 0 indicating severe impairment in performance, 1 indicating moderate impairment in performance, and 2 indicating normal performance. The 14 items cover anticipatory postural adjustments, reactive postural control, sensory orientation, and dynamic gait. The highest possible score is 28, with a score of 21 or below indicating an elevated risk of falls. The performance of the miniBesTest is video-recorded.

The mobility function is assessed using the Narrow Path Walking Test (NPWT). The performance is scored based on the completion time (in seconds) taken to complete a six-metre-long path. A green mat measuring 40 x 300cm is used to divide a path into two 20-centimetre-wide pathways. The participants will be asked to stand up from a chair, walk around the green mat while avoiding stepping over the boundaries, and return to the chair at the starting point. Step errors are marked as those that step outside the boundaries. Three trials are allowed, and the average completion time will be used as final performance. The performance is video-recorded.

This will be assessed by the 30-second Chair Stand Test. The participant will be asked to sit fully on a chair and rise to a full standing position as many times as possible within 30 seconds. During the assessment, they are not allowed to use their hands for assistance. The assessor will count the number of repetitions a participant can complete within 30 seconds. Anyone who uses their hands to stand up will be scored a "0".

Fear of fall is assessed using the Chinese-validated version of the 16-item Fall Efficacy Scale International (FES-I). Each item is rated on a four-point Likert scale, where 1 indicates not concerned and 4 indicates extremely concerned. The total score can range from 16 to 84. The higher the FES-I score, the higher the fear of falls. A cutoff score of 28 or higher indicates a higher risk of falls.

This is assessed by the 30-item Fall Behavioural Scale (FaB). Each item is rated on a four-level Likert scale, with 1 = "never", 2 = "sometimes", 3 = "often", 4 = "always", and an option of "not applicable". The higher the FaB score, the higher the use of protective behaviours.

Fall hazard in home environment is assessed by the WestMead Home Safety Assessment (WeHSA). The WeHSA assessed a total of 72-item hazard categories across 13 areas at home, where applicable. The outcome measure is the number of hazards identified across these 13 areas.

The number of falls in the past 12 months, fall characteristics and consquences will be collected

The adoption rate is the proportion of people who are introduced to an advanced assistive device and agree to use the device during the intervention period. A binary outcome will be collected, i.e. yes/ no.

The continuation rate of the intervention components will be recorded as a binary outcome, i.e. yes or no. We collect whether the participant continue to engage in execise training, use of AI glassess/ smartphone accessibility, after intervention period.

This will be assessed using the Chinese version of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (C-QUEST). This survey has 12 statements focusing on the device domain (Dimension, weight, adjustment, safety, durability, simplicity of use, comfort, and effectiveness) and the service domain (delivery service, repair/servicing, professional service, and follow-up service). Each statement is rated on a scale from 1 to 5, with 1 = "not satisfied at all" to 5 = "very satisfied". The questionnaire will yield three scores: the sub-scores for the device and service domains, and the total C-QUEST score. The CQUEST score can range from 12 to 60. The higher the CQUEST score, the higher the satisfaction towards the prescribed assistive technology. Each participant is also required to identify the three most important items out of the 12 items.