Transilvania University of Brașov
Brasov, Brașov County, 500036, Romania
NCT Number: NCT07825948
This study evaluated whether an AI-personalized digital exercise programme could improve exercise adherence, physical activity, wellbeing, and physical performance among university students compared with a standardized digital exercise programme. University students were randomly assigned to one of two digital exercise programmes for 8 weeks. The AI-personalized programme adjusted exercise recommendations using participant characteristics, previous exercise adherence, readiness, pain, safety information, and physical performance measures. The comparator provided a standardized digital exercise programme without adaptive weekly personalization. The primary outcome was mean weekly exercise adherence. Secondary outcomes included physical activity, wellbeing, countermovement jump performance, lower-limb reaction time, engagement, usability, and safety.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Brasov, Brașov County, 500036, Romania
This was an 8-week, two-group randomized controlled trial conducted among undergraduate students at Transilvania University of Brașov, Romania. The study compared an AI-personalized digital exercise programme with a standardized digital exercise programme delivered within the same digital study environment.
Participants assigned to the AI-personalized group received exercise recommendations through MoveAI-Student version 2.1.0 using the version-controlled v1.3-adaptive system. The system combined prespecified safety rules with a supervised recommendation model. Personalization used participant characteristics, sport participation, weekly training volume, countermovement jump performance, simple and choice reaction time, readiness, pain, previous-week adherence, and safety information. Exercise recommendations could specify session frequency, duration, intensity, and additional emphasis on lower-limb power or reactive drills. Recommendations were updated once per intervention week. Progression was limited by predefined safety rules, and exercise load could be reduced when pain or an adverse-event flag was present. Human override of recommendations was permitted when required.
Participants assigned to the standardized digital comparator used the same digital study environment but did not receive the adaptive weekly prescription procedure. The comparator programme prescribed three exercise sessions per week, with each session lasting 35 minutes.
The primary outcome was mean weekly exercise adherence, calculated from completed sessions relative to prescribed sessions across the 8-week intervention. Secondary outcomes included total physical activity assessed with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form, WHO-5 wellbeing, countermovement jump performance, simple reaction time, choice reaction time, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, application engagement, satisfaction, perceived usefulness, usability, sitting time, body weight, body mass index, and adverse events.
The study was designed to estimate the effect of the adaptive programme as a complete intervention compared with standardized digital exercise. It was not designed to isolate the independent effect of the algorithm from differences in exercise prescription or completed exercise exposure.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Undergraduate student currently enrolled at Transilvania University of Brașov. Age 18 to 65 years at baseline. Written informed consent provided before any study-specific procedure. Able to safely complete the standardized countermovement jump protocol using OptoJump.
Able to safely complete the lower-limb simple and choice reaction-time protocols using BlazePod.
Access to a smartphone compatible with the study application. Willing to use the study application throughout the 8-week intervention. Able to attend both baseline and post-intervention assessments.
Exclusion criteria
Acute musculoskeletal injury or pain that made jumping or rapid lower-limb responses unsafe.
Medical condition contraindicating exercise participation or study testing. Use of medication known to affect neuromuscular performance or reaction time, as defined in the approved protocol.
Concurrent participation in another interventional exercise or digital-health trial.
Inability or unwillingness to complete the required assessments or the 8-week digital intervention.
An 8-week digital exercise intervention using MoveAI-Student version 2.1.0 and the v1.3-adaptive system. Initial exercise prescriptions ranged from three to five sessions per week, 30 to 45 minutes per session, at moderate-to-vigorous intensity. Recommendations were updated weekly using adherence and safety information. Prescriptions could modify session frequency, duration, intensity, and emphasis on lower-limb power or reactive drills. Predefined safety rules limited weekly progression and allowed reduced exercise load when pain or an adverse-event flag was present.
An 8-week standardized digital exercise intervention delivered through the same study application. Participants were prescribed three exercise sessions per week, with each session lasting 35 minutes. The programme did not use the adaptive weekly prescription procedure applied in the AI-personalized group.
Time frame: From intervention initiation through the end of Week 8
Weekly adherence was calculated as completed exercise sessions relative to prescribed exercise sessions within each intervention week. The participant-level mean across the 8-week intervention was used as the primary outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and at the end of Week 8
Total physical activity was assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF) and expressed as MET-minutes per week.
Time frame: Baseline and at the end of Week 8
Wellbeing was assessed using the WHO-5 Well-Being Index.
Time frame: Baseline and at the end of Week 8
Best countermovement jump height was assessed using OptoJump Next and expressed in centimeters.
Time frame: Baseline and at the end of Week 8
Mean countermovement jump height was assessed using OptoJump Next and expressed in centimeters.
Time frame: Baseline and at the end of Week 8
Description: Lower-limb simple reaction time was assessed using BlazePod and expressed in milliseconds.
Time frame: Baseline and at the end of Week 8
Lower-limb choice reaction time was assessed using BlazePod and expressed in milliseconds.
Transilvania University of Brasov
Other
Effects of an AI-Personalized Digital Exercise Programme on Adherence, Physical Activity, and Wellbeing Among University Students: An 8-Week Randomized Controlled Trial
Acronym: AIPDEUS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07140185
Behavior, Dyssomnias
Sfax, Tunisia
View Trial DetailsNCT07813312
Behavior, Cardiorespiratory Fitness
Brasov, Brașov County, Romania
View Trial DetailsNCT06605066
Algorithms, Behavior
Bolu, Turkey, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT03003117
Behavior, Breast Feeding
Lille, France
View Trial Details