Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, not recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07825584

Sperm Selection Strategies and Male-Factor Phenotypes in ICSI

This retrospective multicentre observational cohort study evaluates clinical and reproductive outcomes associated with different sperm-selection strategies used during intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), including conventional ICSI, hyaluronan-binding sperm selection (PICSI), and microfluidic sperm selection. The study uses routinely collected real-world clinical and laboratory data from fertility treatment cycles performed at multiple centres. Analyses will assess overall comparative effectiveness and whether treatment effects differ according to male-factor phenotypes, including sperm DNA fragmentation. Key outcomes include fertilization, embryo development, pregnancy establishment, pregnancy loss, and cumulative reproductive outcomes at the source-cycle level. The study is observational; treatment allocation was determined by routine clinical practice rather than by a study protocol.

Active, not recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Bocian Fertility Clinic, Poznań, Poznan, Greater Poland Voivodeship, Poland

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The ANDRO-ART study is a retrospective, multicentre, observational cohort study based on routinely collected clinical and embryological data from ICSI treatment cycles performed across multiple fertility centres. The study compares three sperm-selection strategies used in routine clinical practice: conventional ICSI, hyaluronan-binding sperm selection (PICSI), and microfluidic sperm selection.

The primary analytical framework will evaluate comparative effectiveness in the overall cohort, followed by prespecified phenotype-specific analyses. Particular attention will be given to male-factor biomarkers, including sperm DNA fragmentation, in order to assess whether the clinical association between sperm-selection strategy and reproductive outcomes differs across biologically defined subgroups.

Outcomes of interest include fertilization, embryo development, clinical pregnancy, pregnancy loss, and cumulative reproductive outcomes evaluated from the source ICSI cycle. Additional analyses may include treatment-by-phenotype interactions, subgroup analyses based on sperm DNA fragmentation categories, and sensitivity analyses designed to address confounding and centre-level heterogeneity.

The study is non-interventional. Patients were not assigned to sperm-selection strategies according to a research protocol; all procedures were performed as part of routine fertility treatment. Historical data will be analysed using predefined eligibility criteria and statistical methods before final data freeze.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult women undergoing an ICSI source cycle at a participating fertility centre during the study period.
  • Source cycles performed using conventional ICSI, hyaluronan-binding sperm selection (PICSI), or microfluidic sperm selection.
  • Availability of routinely collected clinical and embryological data sufficient to classify the sperm-selection strategy and evaluate at least one prespecified study outcome.

Exclusion criteria

  • Cycles not involving ICSI.
  • Records with insufficient or internally inconsistent data preventing reliable identification of the source ICSI cycle or sperm-selection strategy.
  • Cycles involving combined hyaluronan-binding and microfluidic sperm selection are excluded from the primary three-group comparative analysis and may be evaluated separately in prespecified sensitivity analyses.

Treatment and study plan

Conventional ICSI

Procedure

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection performed after routine conventional sperm preparation without hyaluronan-binding sperm selection or microfluidic sperm selection.

Hyaluronan-Binding Sperm Selection

Procedure

Hyaluronan-binding sperm selection used before intracytoplasmic sperm injection as part of routine clinical practice.

ZyMōt

Procedure

Microfluidic sperm selection used before intracytoplasmic sperm injection as part of routine clinical practice.

Primary outcomes

  1. Pregnancy Loss After Clinical Pregnancy

    Time frame: Up to 22 completed weeks of gestation

    Pregnancy loss following an established clinical pregnancy. The proportion of clinical pregnancies resulting in pregnancy loss will be compared across conventional ICSI, hyaluronan-binding sperm selection (PICSI), and microfluidic sperm selection. Prespecified analyses will assess effect modification by sperm DNA fragmentation, including SDF >20% versus ≤20%.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical Pregnancy

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks after embryo transfer

    Clinical pregnancy following embryo transfer, assessed according to routinely recorded clinical follow-up. The proportion of embryo transfers resulting in clinical pregnancy will be compared across conventional ICSI, hyaluronan-binding sperm selection (PICSI), and microfluidic sperm selection.

  2. Cumulative Clinical Pregnancy per Source ICSI Cycle

    Time frame: From the source ICSI procedure through the last recorded embryo transfer derived from that procedure, up to 5 years

    Occurrence of at least one clinical pregnancy resulting from fresh and/or frozen-thawed embryo transfers derived from the same source ICSI cycle. The cumulative proportion of source ICSI cycles resulting in at least one clinical pregnancy will be compared across conventional ICSI, hyaluronan-binding sperm selection (PICSI), and microfluidic sperm selection.

  3. Normal Fertilization Rate

    Time frame: Approximately 16-18 hours after ICSI

    Proportion of mature oocytes (MII) undergoing ICSI that demonstrated normal fertilization, defined by the presence of two pronuclei (2PN). Normal fertilization rate will be compared across conventional ICSI, hyaluronan-binding sperm selection (PICSI), and microfluidic sperm selection.

  4. Blastocyst Development Rate

    Time frame: From normal fertilization assessment through day 5-7 of embryo culture

    Proportion of normally fertilized oocytes (2PN) developing to the blastocyst stage. Blastocyst development rate will be compared across conventional ICSI, hyaluronan-binding sperm selection (PICSI), and microfluidic sperm selection.

Other outcomes

  1. No Usable Embryo per Initiated ICSI Cycle

    Time frame: From ICSI through completion of embryo culture for the source cycle

    Proportion of initiated ICSI source cycles resulting in no embryo considered usable for transfer and/or cryopreservation according to routine laboratory assessment. The outcome is defined at the source-cycle level as zero usable embryos and will be compared across conventional ICSI, hyaluronan-binding sperm selection (PICSI), and microfluidic sperm selection.

  2. Zero 2PN per Initiated ICSI Cycle

    Time frame: Approximately 16-18 hours after ICSI

    Proportion of initiated ICSI source cycles in which no normally fertilized oocyte (2PN) was observed after ICSI. This outcome will be compared across conventional ICSI, hyaluronan-binding sperm selection (PICSI), and microfluidic sperm selection.

Interested in participating?

Active, not recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Center for Reproductive Medicine Bocian

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparative Effectiveness of Conventional ICSI, Hyaluronan-Binding Sperm Selection, and Microfluidic Sperm Selection Across Male-Factor Phenotypes: A Multicentre Retrospective Cohort Study

Acronym: ANDRO-ART

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Sep 17, 2026
Registry last updated
Sep 17, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.