Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07824414

Prognostic Value of Pulse Oximetry Differences

This prospective observational study aims to evaluate whether the difference between finger, earlobe and forehead SpO₂ (ΔSpO₂) measured at emergency department (ED) presentation is associated with clinical outcomes in adult patients presenting with dyspnea. We will compare ΔSpO₂ between patients with poor outcomes (death or intensive care unit [ICU] admission) and those with favorable outcomes. Secondary objectives include assessing the prognostic value of ΔSpO₂ for mortality, ICU admission, and lactate, and comparing its predictive performance with established early warning scores.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

19 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Yonsei University Severance Hospital

Seoul, 03722, South Korea

Location status: Recruiting

About this study

This is a prospective observational cohort study conducted in a single ED to evaluate the prognostic significance of inter-site differences in pulse oximetry in adult patients presenting with dyspnea.

Adult patients (≥19 years) presenting with dyspnea and classified as Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS) levels 1-3 will be enrolled at the time of ED admission. During initial vital sign assessment at ED presentation, SpO₂ will be simultaneously measured at the finger, earlobe, and forehead, along with the corresponding perfusion index at each site.

The primary exposure of interest is the difference between finger and earlobe SpO₂ (ΔSpO₂). Additional inter-site SpO₂ differences involving forehead measurements will also be evaluated. Clinical and physiological data at presentation will be collected prospectively, while outcome data will be obtained through retrospective medical record review.

The primary outcome is the mean difference in ΔSpO₂ between patients with poor outcomes-defined as all-cause mortality from ED admission to hospital discharge or intensive care unit (ICU) admission-and those with favorable outcomes. Secondary outcomes include the associations of ΔSpO₂ with mortality, ICU admission, endotracheal intubation, serum lactate levels, and perfusion index, as well as the predictive performance of ΔSpO₂ using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The prognostic value of ΔSpO₂ will also be compared with established early warning scores such as NEWS.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients aged 19 years or older presenting to the emergency department with dyspnea, classified as KTAS level 1-3

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients in whom SpO₂ measurements were not obtained simultaneously
  • Patients in whom arterial blood gas analysis was not ordered at initial evaluation
  • Pregnant patients
  • Patients with facial trauma or hand trauma
  • Patients with amputation, injury, or burns at the measurement sites
  • Patients wearing nail polish
  • Patients with dyshemoglobinemia
  • Non-Korean nationality
  • Patients who did not provide consent to participate in the study

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. In-hospital mortality or ICU admission

    Time frame: From the index emergency department visit through hospital discharge, assessed up to 6 months.

    In-hospital mortality or ICU admission of index visit

Interested in participating?

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Yonsei University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Prognostic Significance of Multi-site Pulse Oximetry Differences in Dyspneic Emergency Department Patients

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Sep 17, 2026
Registry last updated
Sep 17, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.