Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, not recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07824037

Endoscopic-Assisted Versus Conventional Crestal Sinus Lift

To compare Endoscopic-Assisted Versus Conventional Crestal Sinus Lift; bone grafting will be performed, followed by implant placement. Membrane perforation rates, surgical time, and bone density changes will be evaluated.

Active, not recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

21 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Cairo University

Cairo, Cairo Governorate, 12515, Egypt

About this study

Type of study design: A Randomized Clinical Trial Objective of the research: To compare Endoscopic-Assisted Versus Conventional Crestal Sinus Lift; bone grafting will be performed, followed by implant placement. Membrane perforation rates, surgical time, and bone density changes will be evaluated.

Steps of the research in short including the following:

  • The inclusion and exclusion criteria for patient selection. Inclusion criteria: Loss of one or more maxillary posterior tooth, Patients age≥21 years, Bone height was 4-7 mm, sufficient inter-arch space and mesio-distal width.

Exclusion criteria

Parafunctional habits, Drug or alcohol abuse, uncontrolled systemic diseases that contraindicate implant surgery, pregnant women, Smokers.

  • Mention the source of the patients enrolled in the research All patients will be operated on and followed up at the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Egypt.
  • A written informed consent form will be signed from the patientis required.
  • Description of the methodology. Radiographic assessment involved panoramic X-rays and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). CBCT analysis included evaluation of residual bone height, buccopalatal bone width, sinus pathology, bony septa, and precise measurement of Schneiderian membrane thickness at the planned implant sites Group 1(non-endoscopic-guided): Endoscopic evaluation was performed after complete osteotomy preparation and sinus membrane elevation using osteotomes.

Group 2 (Endoscopic-guided): Endoscopic evaluation was conducted after each drilling step, osteotome malleting, and bone graft placement to monitor sinus membrane integrity.

Sample size calculation.

  • Randomization in case of RCT. Patients will be divided into two groups based on treatment type using block randomization of block size 4. An independent statistician will generate the random sequence using a computer-generated random number list method by (https://www.randomizer.org/).
  • Number of visits & follow up period. ( 4 visits)

Patients in both groups will be followed up at 24-hours, one, three, six, months postoperatively to assess this parameter:

  • Membrane integrity intraoperative.
  • Surgical intraoperative time.
  • Radiographically, mean bone density will be measured (immediate post-operative and post 6 months CBCT)

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Loss of one or more maxillary posterior tooth, Patients age≥21 years, Bone height was 4-7 mm, sufficient inter-arch space and mesio-distal width.

Exclusion criteria

  • Parafunctional habits, Drug or alcohol abuse, uncontrolled systemic diseases that contraindicate implant surgery, pregnant women, Smokers.

Treatment and study plan

Endoscopic-guided Sinus lift

Procedure

12 patients in Group 2 (Endoscopic-guided): Endoscopic evaluation was conducted after each drilling step, osteotome malleting, and bone graft placement to monitor sinus membrane integrity.

non- endoscopic sinus lift

Procedure

12 patients in Group 1(non-endoscopic-guided): Endoscopic evaluation was performed after complete osteotomy preparation and sinus membrane elevation using osteotomes.

Primary outcomes

  1. Membrane integrity intraoperative.

    Time frame: 24 hours

    Membrane remains intact ( no perforation)

Secondary outcomes

  1. mean bone density

    Time frame: 6 months

    CBCT

Interested in participating?

Active, not recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Nahla Mahmoud Awad

Other

Collaborators

  • Cairo University

Registry information

Official study title

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Endoscopic-Assisted Versus Conventional Crestal Sinus Lift: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Acronym: sinus lift

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
Sep 17, 2026
Registry last updated
Sep 17, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.