Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07823842

T2AIR: Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Biologics Targeting Type 2 Inflammation in Asthma and COPD

This prospective, real-world observational study (T2AIR Study) evaluates the long-term efficacy and safety of six biologics targeting Type 2 inflammation - omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab, tezepelumab, and depemokimab - in patients with chronic airway diseases, including asthma and COPD under routine clinical practice in China.

The primary objective is to determine the annualized exacerbation rate (AER) over 12 months of treatment. Secondary objectives include time to first exacerbation, frequency of severe exacerbations, improvements in symptom control and quality of life (using disease-specific questionnaires), lung function (FEV₁, FVC), airway inflammatory biomarkers (FeNO, blood eosinophils, serum IgE), oral corticosteroid (OCS) sparing effect in asthma patients, and treatment persistence.

Safety outcomes will assess the incidence, types, and severity of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Exploratory endpoints include high-resolution CT (HRCT)-based imaging markers of airway remodeling and the development of deep learning-based multimodal predictive models integrating clinical, biomarker, and radiomics data to support personalized treatment. Additionally, blood, sputum, and urine samples will be collected for translational research to explore underlying mechanisms and predictors of biologic response.

This study aims to generate robust real-world evidence on the effectiveness and safety of Type 2-targeted biologics across the broad spectrum of chronic airway diseases in a diverse Chinese patient population.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

About this study

Chronic airway diseases, encompassing asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are heterogeneous disorders characterized by chronic airway inflammation, persistent airflow limitation, and/or airway hyperresponsiveness. These conditions commonly present with chronic cough, sputum production, and dyspnea. Acute exacerbations can be life-threatening and represent a leading global cause of disability and premature mortality among chronic non-communicable diseases.

Although inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) combined with long-acting bronchodilators (LABA/LAMA) form the mainstay of treatment, a substantial proportion of patients - approximately 5-10% with asthma and selected COPD patients experience severe or refractory disease. These patients suffer from recurrent exacerbations, progressive lung function decline, impaired quality of life, and serious complications associated with long-term oral corticosteroid (OCS) use, including osteoporosis and increased infection risk.

Type 2 (T2-high) inflammation, driven by eosinophil activation and the IL-4/IL-5/IL-13 signaling pathways, plays a central role in the pathogenesis of most severe asthma cases and a significant subset of COPD patients. In recent years, biologics targeting key mediators of Type 2 inflammation - including IgE, IL-5/IL-5Rα, IL-4Rα, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) - have emerged as precision therapeutic options for patients inadequately controlled on standard therapy.

The six biologics evaluated in this study are:

  • Omalizumab (anti-IgE monoclonal antibody)
  • Mepolizumab (anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibody)
  • Benralizumab (anti-IL-5Rα monoclonal antibody)
  • Dupilumab (anti-IL-4Rα monoclonal antibody, blocking IL-4/IL-13 signaling)
  • Tezepelumab (anti-TSLP monoclonal antibody, effective in both T2-high and T2-low phenotypes)
  • Depemokimab (ultra-long-acting anti-IL-5 Fc-fusion protein enabling twice-yearly dosing) Current international guidelines (GINA 2026 and GOLD 2026) recommend these Type 2-targeted biologics as add-on therapy for moderate-to-severe patients with poor control despite optimized standard care, with selection often guided by biomarkers such as blood eosinophils (EOS) and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO). While these agents have demonstrated efficacy in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for severe asthma and eosinophilic COPD, robust real-world evidence remains limited, long-term use, diverse phenotypes, elderly patients, and those with multiple comorbidities. Moreover, data specific to Chinese populations are scarce. This prospective real-world observational study aims to address these evidence gaps.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Subjects must meet all of the following criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years; 2. Confirmed diagnosis of at least one of the following chronic airway diseases:
  • Asthma: Diagnosed according to the 2025 GINA guidelines, with typical variable respiratory symptoms (wheeze, shortness of breath, chest tightness, or cough) and objective evidence of variable expiratory airflow limitation (positive bronchodilator reversibility test, positive bronchial provocation test, average daily PEF variability >10%, improvement in lung function after ICS treatment, or significant variability in lung function between two visits).
  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): Diagnosed according to the 2026 GOLD guidelines, with symptoms of dyspnea, chronic cough, or sputum production, and/or history of exposure to risk factors, and post-bronchodilator FEV₁/FVC < 70%.
  • Meets clinical indications for biologic therapy as judged by a respiratory or allergy specialist according to current guidelines:
  • Asthma: Poor control despite optimized high-dose ICS-LABA therapy, presence of allergic or eosinophilic inflammatory biomarkers, or severe/refractory disease requiring maintenance oral corticosteroids (OCS).
  • COPD: Frequent exacerbations despite triple inhaled therapy (ICS + LABA + LAMA), with blood eosinophil count (EOS) ≥ 300/μL and chronic bronchitis phenotype.
  • The treating respiratory or allergy specialist has decided to initiate or switch to one of the following approved biologics targeting Type 2 inflammation, based on 2025 GINA and 2026 GOLD guidelines: omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab, tezepelumab, or depemokimab (tezepelumab may be used in both Type 2 and non-Type 2 inflammation).
  • Able and willing to provide written informed consent and commit to at least 12 months of follow-up.

Exclusion criteria

Subjects will be excluded if they meet any of the following criteria:

  • Presence of severe or uncontrolled pulmonary or systemic diseases (e.g., active malignancy, autoimmune disease) or active infectious respiratory diseases (e.g., active pulmonary tuberculosis or infectious pneumonia);
  • Pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning pregnancy during the study period;
  • Known history of hypersensitivity or allergy to any component of the planned biologic agent;
  • Expected life expectancy less than 12 months;
  • Any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, makes the subject unsuitable for participation (e.g., poor compliance or inability to complete follow-up).

Treatment and study plan

Biologics targeting Type 2 inflammation

Drug

Biologics targeting Type 2 inflammation, including Omalizumab (anti-IgE monoclonal antibody), Mepolizumab (anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibody), Benralizumab (anti-IL-5Rα monoclonal antibody), Dupilumab (anti-IL-4Rα monoclonal antibody, blocking IL-4/IL-13 signaling), Tezepelumab (anti-TSLP monoclonal antibody, effective in both T2-high and T2-low phenotypes), Depemokimab (ultra-long-acting anti-IL-5 Fc-fusion protein enabling twice-yearly dosing)

Other names: Interventional group

Patients with asthma and copd who received standard of care

Drug

Patients with asthma and copd who received standard of care as recommended by relevant guidelines

Other names: Standard of Care Group

Primary outcomes

  1. Annual rate of protocol-defined exacerbations of chronic airway disease over 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months

    Number of protocol-defined exacerbations per participant-year during the 12-month follow-up. An exacerbation is defined according to the disease-specific international criteria applicable to the participant's primary diagnosis: GINA 2026 for asthma; GOLD 2026 for COPD; ERS 2025 for bronchiectasis; and ERS 2024 for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA). Events are ascertained from participant report, medical records, and investigator assessment at scheduled and unscheduled visits.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to first exacerbation;

    Time frame: 12 months

    Exacerbations of chronic airway diseases as defined by international guidelines: GINA 2026 (asthma) and GOLD 2026 (COPD).

  2. Frequency of severe exacerbations

    Time frame: 12 months

    Severe exacerbations of chronic airway diseases as defined by international guidelines: GINA 2026 (asthma), GOLD 2026 (COPD), ERS 2025 (bronchiectasis), and ERS 2024 (ABPA)

  3. Change from baseline in Asthma Control Test (ACT) total score at 3, 6, 9, 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months

    The Asthma Control Test (ACT) is a 5-item patient-reported questionnaire assessing asthma control over the previous 4 weeks. Total score ranges from 5 to 25; higher scores indicate better asthma control. Change is calculated as 3, 6, 9, 12-month score minus baseline score.

  4. Change from baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6) score at 3, 6, 9, 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months

    The Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6) assesses asthma symptom control. Each of 6 items is scored from 0 to 6; the total score is the mean of item scores and ranges from 0 to 6. Higher scores indicate worse asthma control. Change is 12-month score minus baseline score.

  5. Change from baseline in COPD Assessment Test (CAT) total score at 3, 6, 9, 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months

    The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) is an 8-item questionnaire. Total score ranges from 0 to 40; higher scores indicate worse health status. Change is 3, 6, 9, 12-month score minus baseline score.

  6. Change from baseline in modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale at 3, 6, 9, 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months

    The modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale ranges from 0 to 4; higher scores indicate more severe dyspnea. Change is 3, 6, 9, 12-month grade minus baseline grade.

  7. Change from baseline in Quality of Life-Bronchiectasis Respiratory Symptoms Score (QoL-B RSS) at 3, 6, 9, 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months

    The Quality of Life-Bronchiectasis (QoL-B) Respiratory Symptoms Score is a domain of the QoL-B questionnaire. Domain scores range from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate fewer respiratory symptoms / better health status. Change is 3, 6, 9, 12-month score minus baseline score. This instrument is only measured for patients with bronchiectasis.

  8. Change from baseline in Bronchiectasis Impact Measure (BIM) total score at 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months

    The Bronchiectasis Impact Measure (BIM) is a patient-reported instrument assessing the impact of bronchiectasis. Total score ranges from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate greater disease impact (worse outcome). Change is 3, 6, 9, 12-month score minus baseline score. This instrument is only measured for patients with bronchiectasis.

  9. Change from baseline in Bronchiectasis Symptom Visual Analog Scale (BS-VAS) score at 3, 6, 9, 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months

    The Bronchiectasis Symptom Visual Analog Scale (BS-VAS) measures overall bronchiectasis symptom burden on a 10-mm visual analog scale ranging from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate worse symptoms. Change is 3, 6, 9, 12-month score minus baseline score. This instrument is only measured for patients with bronchiectasis.

  10. Change from baseline in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score at 3, 6, 9, 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months

    The St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score ranges from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate worse health-related quality of life. Administered to participants with asthma or COPD, and to participants with ABPA who have comorbid asthma. Change is 3, 6, 9, 12-month score minus baseline score.

  11. Lung function parameters

    Time frame: 12 months

    Lung function parameters (FEV₁, FVC, and FEV₁/FVC ratio);

  12. Airway inflammation and immune biomarkers

    Time frame: 12 months

    Airway inflammation and immune biomarkers (fractional exhaled nitric oxide [FeNO], peripheral blood eosinophil [EOS] count, and serum IgE levels)

  13. Oral corticosteroid (OCS) sparing effect in asthma patients

    Time frame: 12 months

    Oral corticosteroid (OCS) sparing effect in asthma patients during treatment duration

  14. Treatment persistence rate of the biologics

    Time frame: 12 months

    Treatment persistence rate of the biologics during treatment duration

Other outcomes

  1. Safety Objective

    Time frame: 12 months

    To evaluate the incidence, types, and severity of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) occurring within 12 months of treatment with the different biologics in patients with chronic airway diseases.

  2. Exploratory Objectives

    Time frame: 12 months

    To explore novel endpoints for biologic treatment in chronic airway diseases, particularly imaging markers derived from high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), such as airway wall thickness and functional small airway disease;

  3. Discriminative performance (AUROC) of a multimodal deep-learning model for predicting protocol-defined treatment response at 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months

    Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for a pre-specified deep-learning model that integrates baseline clinical variables, biomarkers, and chest CT radiomics features to predict protocol-defined treatment response at 12 months. Treatment response is defined as absence of protocol-defined exacerbation during 12-month follow-up. Model input features and the response definition are specified in the statistical analysis plan. AUROC ranges from 0 to 1; higher values indicate better discrimination.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Gao Yong-hua, PhD, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+8617321278520

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Biologics Targeting Type 2 Inflammation Across the Spectrum of Chronic Airway Diseases - A Prospective Observational Study in Asthma and COPD

Acronym: T2AIR

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2029
Study completion
2029
First posted
Sep 16, 2026
Registry last updated
Sep 16, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.