Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07823400

MIECC vs Conventional Cardiopulmonary Bypass and Systemic Inflammation in CABG

This prospective observational study evaluates the effects of minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation (MIECC) and conventional cardiopulmonary bypass on systemic inflammatory response in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Adult patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery will be observed according to the extracorporeal circulation technique used during surgery. Systemic inflammation will be assessed using routinely available hematologic inflammatory indices, including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII). These parameters will be evaluated preoperatively, at postoperative 6 hours, at postoperative 24 hours, and at hospital discharge. The study will also evaluate selected perioperative and postoperative clinical outcomes in order to compare the inflammatory response associated with MIECC and conventional extracorporeal circulation.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

30 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital

Bursa, 16000, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Ümran Karaca, M.D.

CONTACT

[email protected]

+90 505 494 16 87

About this study

Coronary artery bypass graft surgery performed with cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with activation of systemic inflammatory pathways. Contact of blood with the extracorporeal circuit, surgical trauma, ischemia-reperfusion injury, and perioperative factors may contribute to this response. Minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation systems are designed to reduce blood-air contact, circuit surface area, and hemodilution and may therefore attenuate the inflammatory response compared with conventional cardiopulmonary bypass.

In this prospective observational study, patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery will be evaluated according to whether minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation or conventional extracorporeal circulation is used during surgery. No treatment assignment will be made by the study protocol.

Inflammatory response will be assessed using neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and systemic immune-inflammation index calculated from routinely obtained laboratory measurements. Measurements will be evaluated preoperatively, at 6 hours after surgery, at 24 hours after surgery, and at hospital discharge. Perioperative variables and postoperative clinical outcomes will also be recorded for comparison between the two groups.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 30-70 years
  • Patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery
  • Patients in whom cardiopulmonary bypass is planned
  • Written informed consent obtained

Exclusion criteria

  • Emergency surgery
  • Redo cardiac surgery
  • Concomitant valve surgery
  • Previous open heart surgery
  • Preoperative renal and/or hepatic failure
  • Malignancy
  • Active infection or inflammatory disease-

Treatment and study plan

Minimally Invasive Extracorporeal Circulation

Procedure

Use of a minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation system during coronary artery bypass graft surgery as part of routine clinical care.

Conventional Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Procedure

Use of conventional cardiopulmonary bypass during coronary artery bypass graft surgery as part of routine clinical care.

Primary outcomes

  1. Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR)

    Time frame: Preoperative baseline, 6 hours after surgery, 24 hours after surgery, and on the morning of hospital discharge, an average of 6 days after surgery.

    NLR will be calculated from routine complete blood count values by dividing the absolute neutrophil count by the absolute lymphocyte count. Values will be compared between the MIECC and conventional cardiopulmonary bypass groups.

  2. Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR)

    Time frame: Preoperative baseline, 6 hours after surgery, 24 hours after surgery, and on the morning of hospital discharge, an average of 6 days after surgery.

    PLR will be calculated from routine complete blood count values by dividing the platelet count by the absolute lymphocyte count. Values will be compared between the MIECC and conventional cardiopulmonary bypass groups.

  3. Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII)

    Time frame: Preoperative baseline, 6 hours after surgery, 24 hours after surgery, and on the morning of hospital discharge, an average of 6 days after surgery.

    SII will be calculated as neutrophil count × platelet count / lymphocyte count using routine complete blood count values. Values will be compared between the MIECC and conventional cardiopulmonary bypass groups.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Ümran Karaca, M.D.

CONTACT

[email protected]

+90 505 494 16 87

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital

Other Gov

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of the Effects of Minimally Invasive and Conventional Extracorporeal Circulation on Systemic Inflammation Indices in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

Acronym: MIECC-CABG

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2027
First posted
Sep 16, 2026
Registry last updated
Sep 16, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.