Zhognshan Hospital ,Fudan University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200032, China
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07815119
This prospective, open-label, multicenter randomized controlled trial will compare two preprocedural imaging assessment strategies in adults with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who are scheduled to undergo percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). Participants will be randomized 1:1 to a transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-guided strategy or a cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-guided strategy for assessment of left atrial appendage anatomy and selection of the occluder type and size. LAAC and postprocedural management will otherwise follow routine clinical practice. The primary outcome is a composite of serious periprocedural safety events through 30 days. At 3 months (plus or minus 2 weeks), participants who undergo LAAC will receive both TEE and CCTA for blinded core-laboratory assessment of peridevice leak, device-related thrombus, and residual left atrial appendage patency. Clinical follow-up will continue through 12 months.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200032, China
Location status: Recruiting
Eligible participants will be adults with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation for whom LAAC is planned for stroke prevention. After written informed consent and confirmation of eligibility, participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio through a centralized electronic system using center-stratified, variable-block randomization.
In the TEE-guided group, preprocedural planning will be based primarily on TEE measurements of left atrial appendage morphology, ostial dimensions, depth, and adjacent structures. In the CCTA-guided group, planning will be based primarily on CCTA assessment of morphology, three-dimensional anatomy, ostial area, depth, and adjacent structures. In both groups, the assigned modality will guide occluder type and size selection. Use of the nonassigned modality when clinically necessary will be documented. The indication for LAAC, the procedure itself, intraprocedural imaging, and postprocedural management will follow standardized routine care.
The trial has two linked components. The randomized strategy comparison evaluates procedural performance and early clinical safety. An embedded paired-imaging study will compare TEE and CCTA within the same participant at 3 months after LAAC. Clinical events will be adjudicated by an independent clinical event committee blinded to randomized assignment. Prespecified imaging outcomes will be assessed by a blinded imaging core laboratory. Follow-up visits are planned before discharge and at 3, 6, and 12 months after LAAC.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
TEE is used as the primary preprocedural imaging modality to evaluate left atrial appendage morphology, ostial dimensions, depth, and relationships to adjacent structures and to guide occluder type and size selection.
CCTA is used as the primary preprocedural imaging modality to evaluate left atrial appendage morphology, three-dimensional anatomy, ostial area, depth, and relationships to adjacent structures and to guide occluder type and size selection.
Time frame: From the start of the LAAC procedure through 30 days after the procedure
Number and percentage of participants with at least one of the following events, adjudicated by a blinded independent clinical event committee: cardiovascular death; ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke; systemic embolism; clinically relevant pericardial effusion or cardiac tamponade; or another serious procedure-related complication. Prespecified serious procedure-related complications include device embolization, major vascular complications, acute kidney injury, or bleeding requiring transfusion, interventional treatment, or surgery.
Time frame: 3 months after LAAC (allowed window: plus or minus 2 weeks)
Maximum peridevice leak width will be measured separately by TEE and CCTA and adjudicated by the blinded imaging core laboratory. The proportion of participants with a maximum width of at least 3 mm will be reported for each modality and compared within participants.
Time frame: During the LAAC procedure
Number and percentage of LAAC procedures in which the initially selected occluder is replaced because of inappropriate size, inability to achieve stable release, or another recorded procedural reason.
Time frame: From randomization through completion of preprocedural planning
Number and percentage of participants for whom the nonassigned imaging modality is used as a principal basis for preprocedural planning after randomization. The reason for crossover will be recorded.
Time frame: At completion of the LAAC procedure
Number and percentage of participants in whom the occluder is successfully released within the left atrial appendage, is not immediately removed, and is stable at completion of the procedure.
Time frame: From the start of the LAAC procedure through 30 days after the procedure
Each component will be reported separately: cardiovascular death, ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, systemic embolism, clinically relevant pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade, device embolization, major vascular complication, acute kidney injury, and bleeding requiring transfusion, interventional treatment, or surgery.
Time frame: 3 months after LAAC (allowed window: plus or minus 2 weeks)
Number and percentage of participants with device-related thrombus detected by TEE or CCTA and confirmed by the blinded imaging core laboratory.
Time frame: 3 months after LAAC (allowed window: plus or minus 2 weeks)
Number and percentage of participants with residual left atrial appendage patency detected by TEE or CCTA and confirmed by the blinded imaging core laboratory.
Time frame: 3 months after LAAC (allowed window: plus or minus 2 weeks)
Within-participant comparison of TEE and CCTA for device-related thrombus, peridevice leak of at least 3 mm, and residual left atrial appendage patency. Discordant proportions will be compared using McNemar tests and agreement will be summarized using kappa statistics.
Time frame: From LAAC through 12 months; assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months
Number and percentage of participants with an adjudicated ischemic stroke after LAAC.
Time frame: From LAAC through 12 months; assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months
Number and percentage of participants with an adjudicated transient ischemic attack after LAAC.
Time frame: From LAAC through 12 months; assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months
Number and percentage of participants with an adjudicated systemic embolic event after LAAC.
Time frame: From LAAC through 12 months; assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months
Number and percentage of participants with major bleeding defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or higher.
Time frame: From LAAC through 12 months; assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months
Number and percentage of participants with clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding after LAAC.
Time frame: From LAAC through 12 months; assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months
Number and percentage of participants who die from any cause after LAAC.From LAAC through 12 months; assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months
Time frame: From LAAC through 12 months; assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months
Number and percentage of participants who die from a cardiovascular cause after LAAC, as adjudicated by the independent clinical event committee.
Time frame: From discharge through 12 months after LAAC; assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months
Number and percentage of participants whose antithrombotic regimen, intensity, or planned duration is modified on the basis of follow-up imaging findings or clinical events. The reason for each modification will be recorded.
Interested in participating?
Request InfoShanghai Zhongshan Hospital
Other
Periprocedural and Early Outcomes of Left Atrial Appendage Closure According to Preprocedural Imaging Assessment Strategies: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Acronym: PEARL-LAAC
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07458191
NonValvular Atrial Fibrillation
Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
View Trial DetailsNCT07125417
Aspirin, High Bleeding Risk
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan
View Trial DetailsNCT04494347
NonValvular Atrial Fibrillation, Severe Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04586972
Hemorrhage, NonValvular Atrial Fibrillation
Paris, IIe-de-France, France
View Trial Details