Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07815080

Femoral Component TKA: Extramedullary vs Conventional Intramedullary Guide

The study wants to evaluate the performance of this EM guide in comparison to a traditional IM guide.

75 patients will be included in the extramedullary group (to be compared with a corresponding previous group of 75 patients treated with intramedullary guide).

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

IRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio [coordinator], Milan, Italy

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is a widely performed surgical procedure aimed at relieving pain and restoring function in patients with advanced knee arthritis. The success of TKA is contingent upon precise implant positioning, particularly in relation to the femoral component. The femoral component's alignment significantly influences postoperative knee biomechanics, patient satisfaction, and long-term implant survival.

Conventional methods for femoral component positioning involve the use of intramedullary (IM) guides, which are inserted into the femoral canal to align the cutting block for bone preparation. While IM guides offer precise alignment, they can also lead to complications such as intraoperative fractures, fat embolism, activation of coagulation and excessive blood loss.

To address these limitations, extramedullary (EM) guides have emerged as an alternative option. EM guides are placed on the external surface of the femur without entering the medullary canal and avoiding complications that may occur reaming the canal.

In the recent past years, kinematic alignment (KA) has become widespread in use as a new technique for TKR that considers the patient's individual alignment and biomechanics. By restoring the pre-arthritic kinematic axes of the femur and tibia, KA aims to mimic the natural knee joint's function and movement.

In this study a specific EM guide - Anterior Cortex Stylus - is used to address the alignment of the femoral component in the context of a KA approach. The guide uses the anterior cortex of the distal femur as reference for cutting block positioning. The study aims to evaluate the performance of this EM guide in comparison to a traditional IM guide (used in previous group of patients).

This is an open, multi-centre, retro-prospective, observational, controlled study.

The primary aim is to evaluate whether the Anterior Cortex Stylus (in a retro-prospective collected series) is not inferior to the traditional intramedullary guide (previous group of patients) in term of positioning of the femoral component in TKA.

A total of 75 patients will be included in the extramedullary group (to be compared with a corresponding previous group of 75 patients treated with intramedullary guide). Both groups will be treated with a total knee arthroplasty using GMK Sphere (CE marked, class III) and a kinematic alignment approach.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female ≥ 18 years old
  • Indication to primary TKA, for any diagnosis operated with EM or IM guides
  • Signature of the informed consent (only for prospective cohort)
  • Been operated upon between January 2021 and September 2025 (only for retrospective cohort)

Exclusion criteria

  • Revision surgery of knee arthroplasty
  • Patients with malignant diseases (at the time of surgery)
  • Patients with proven or suspect infections (at the time of surgery)
  • Pregnancy end/or lactating (auto declaration)
  • Patient with known allergy to the specific metallic components of the prosthesis (at the time of surgery)

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Anterior Cortex Stylus

    Time frame: Radiographic angle at 3 moth post-op in the sagittal plane, between the anterior cortex of the distal femur and the femoral component and compare it in the group operated with Anterior Cortex Stylus versus the group operated with IM guide.

    Radiographic angle at 3 moth post-op of the femoral component in TKA in an Anterior Cortex Stylus (retro-prospective collected series) compared to intramedullary guide (previous group of patients)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Results across study centres

    Time frame: Compare the results in terms of radiographic sagittal angle between study centres at pre-op, surgery and 3 month post-op.

    Radiographic angles compared between the centres (at pre-op, surgery and 3 month post-op)

  2. Adverse Events to determinate Instrument safety

    Time frame: During surgery

    Number of: adverse events, adverse device effects, serious adverse events and serious adverse device effects

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Laura Mangiavini

CONTACT

0283502227 ext. 0039

Sara Zacchetti

CONTACT

[email protected]

0283502227 ext. 0039

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

I.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Positioning Femoral Component TKA Using an Extramedullary Guide: Comparison With Conventional Intramedullary Guide

Acronym: EMAX (L2055)

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Sep 11, 2026
Registry last updated
Sep 11, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.