Al Wakra Hospital
Doha, 3050, Qatar
NCT Number: NCT07814781
This randomized controlled trial compares hydrophilic methacrylate gel versus beta-sitosterol ointment for early episiotomy wound healing. A total of 107 women who underwent mediolateral episiotomy during vaginal delivery were allocated to receive either hydrophilic methacrylate gel (n=53) or beta-sitosterol ointment (n=54). Wound outcomes were assessed by trained observers blinded to treatment allocation and by patients at two time points approximately 12 days apart. The primary outcome was the REEDA score (Redness, Edema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation). Secondary outcomes included patient-reported pain, cosmetic appearance, satisfaction, perceived treatment effectiveness, ease of application, and likelihood of recommending treatment.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Doha, 3050, Qatar
Wound healing following episiotomy is a complex biological process influenced by mechanical stress, inflammatory response, tissue perfusion, and patient-related factors. This prospective randomized single-blinded controlled trial enrolled adult women who underwent mediolateral episiotomy during vaginal delivery at a tertiary care maternity hospital in Qatar. Exclusion criteria included known dermatological conditions affecting wound healing, hypersensitivity to study products, systemic inflammatory disease, chronic conditions delaying healing (e.g., coagulation disorders, diabetes, anemia with Hb <9 g/dl), prior perineal injury, surgery, or visible lesions, or inability to attend follow-up. A total of 107 women were allocated to receive either hydrophilic methacrylate gel (n=53) or beta-sitosterol ointment (n=54).Outcome assessments were performed by trained observers blinded to treatment allocation and by patients at two time points approximately 12 days apart. Observer-assessed outcomes used the REEDA scale (Redness, Edema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation). Patient-reported outcomes included pain, cosmetic appearance, overall satisfaction, perceived treatment effectiveness, ease of application, and likelihood of recommending treatment.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Topical ointment containing beta-sitosterol applied to the episiotomy/perineal wound site
Hydrophilic methacrylate-based hydrogel applied to the episiotomy/perineal wound site
Time frame: Assessed at two time points: Day 5 postpartum and Day 12 postpartum
Measured using the REEDA scale (Redness, Edema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation) total score, where higher scores indicate worse wound healing, assessed by trained observers blinded to treatment allocation.
Time frame: Day 12 postpartum
Proportion of participants with a REEDA total score of 0 (no observed redness, edema, ecchymosis, discharge, or approximation abnormality) at Day 12 postpartum, assessed by trained observers blinded to treatment allocation.
Time frame: Day 12 postpartum
Patient-reported pain rated on a 5-category verbal scale (None/Mild/Moderate/Severe/Very severe), categorized as none or mild vs. moderate to very severe.
Time frame: Day 12 postpartum
Patient-reported overall satisfaction with treatment (categorized as satisfied/very satisfied vs not satisfied).
Time frame: Day 12 postpartum
Patient-reported perceived effectiveness of treatment (categorized as effective/very effective vs not effective).
Time frame: Day 12 postpartum
Patient-reported cosmetic appearance of the perineal wound (categorized as improved somewhat/significantly vs no change or worsened).
Time frame: Day 12 postpartum
Ease of applying the topical treatment, categorized as easy/very easy vs neutral or difficult.
Time frame: Day 12 postpartum
Likelihood of recommending the treatment to others (categorized as likely/definitely recommend vs neutral or unlikely).
Hamad Medical Corporation
Industry
Optimizing Early Episiotomy Wound Healing: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Hydrophilic Methacrylate Gel Versus Beta-Sitosterol Ointment
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07487974
Episiotomy, Episiotomy Wound
Karaman, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07748182
Episiotomy, Episiotomy Wound
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07736183
Episiotomy, Transperineal Ultrasound
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07730372
Episiotomy, Instrumental Delivery
Gdansk, Pomeranian, Poland
View Trial Details