Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07811102

Hospital-to-Home Transitional Cardiac Rehabilitation After Cardiac Surgery

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves outcomes after cardiac surgery, but is usually delivered on a fixed centre-based schedule that requires repeated daytime hospital attendance. A hybrid model, in which supervised training begins in hospital and then transitions to monitored home-based training, may make the service reachable for more patients without reducing supervision during the early postoperative period.

This single-blind randomised controlled trial compared a hospital-to-home transitional (hybrid) CR programme with conventional centre-based CR in adults at low exercise-training risk after cardiac surgery. Participants were allocated 1:1. Control participants attended twice weekly for 8 weeks (16 supervised sessions). Hybrid participants attended twice weekly for 2 weeks (4 supervised sessions), underwent a repeat risk assessment, and then trained at home for 6 weeks with heart-rate monitoring, a cloud-based care platform, weekly telephone contact and twice-weekly text messages.

The primary outcome was peak oxygen uptake measured by cardiopulmonary exercise testing at baseline and 8 weeks. The trial was designed as a pilot study to estimate treatment effect and variability for a future definitive trial.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

20 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Cheng Hsin General Hospital

Taipei, 11220, Taiwan

About this study

Design and setting. Single-blind, parallel-group randomised controlled trial conducted at the Heart Center, Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. Allocation used a random number table with permuted blocks of four; outcome assessors were not involved in allocation or in delivering training.

Exercise prescription. In both groups aerobic exercise was prescribed from the baseline cardiopulmonary exercise test, targeting 60-80% of heart rate reserve and a rating of perceived exertion of 11-13, with 5-10 minutes of warm-up, 20-30 minutes of conditioning and 5-10 minutes of cool-down. Resistance training used elastic bands (four exercises, ten repetitions, increasing to eight exercises and fifteen repetitions from week three) twice weekly in the hybrid group, and a weekly 50-minute group class in the control group.

Protocol-specified outcomes not collected. Four secondary outcomes listed in the approved protocol were not collected: patient satisfaction with the rehabilitation model; patient-reported time and monetary cost of participation; home physical activity volume, frequency, duration and intensity; and home blood pressure records. These are reported as missing outcomes rather than as null findings.

Post-hoc exploratory analysis. After the trial had begun, healthcare utilisation data for the six months following enrolment (outpatient visits, cardiology outpatient visits, emergency department visits, inpatient days and the corresponding billed amounts) were additionally extracted from hospital records. These were not pre-specified and are reported as post-hoc exploratory analyses only; they are not listed among the outcome measures of this registration and are not used for confirmatory inference. Rehabilitation programme fees for control participants were advanced by the research grant; although recorded under the self-pay category in the hospital billing system, these amounts were not paid by participants and do not represent patient out-of-pocket expenditure.

Analysis. The approved protocol specified two-way analysis of variance. Analysis of covariance adjusted for the baseline value was used instead, on methodological grounds; the protocol-specified two-way analysis of variance was also performed as a sensitivity analysis and gave the same conclusions. Missing data in the intention-to-treat analysis were handled by multiple imputation using predictive mean matching. These changes are documented in protocol version 9.

Registration. This trial was registered retrospectively. Registration was planned for March 2023 but was not completed at that time; no participant data were altered and the analysis plan is documented in the approved protocol and its version 9 amendment.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 20 to 75 years.
  • Admitted to the department of cardiovascular surgery and undergoing cardiac surgery during the index admission.
  • Meeting the indications for cardiac rehabilitation.
  • Classified as low risk (Class B) for exercise training according to the 2013 American Heart Association exercise standards, that is, clinically stable coronary artery disease, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, cardiomyopathy, or an abnormal exercise test not reaching high-risk criteria.
  • Able to self-monitor exercise intensity. Exclusion Criteria
  • An irreversible condition causing exercise intolerance or limiting exercise capacity.
  • Persistent atrial fibrillation or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia within the preceding six months, an implanted defibrillator, or any other rhythm that could compromise the reliability of home heart-rate recording.
  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or recent myocarditis.
  • New York Heart Association class III or IV; angina or ischaemic electrocardiographic change during moderate-intensity exercise; a fall in systolic blood pressure during exercise; non-sustained ventricular tachycardia; previous cardiac arrest; or any condition judged by the physician to be potentially life-threatening.
  • During the study, reported adverse symptoms or escalation of exercise-training risk to Class C or D, including suspected angina, abnormal dyspnoea, vomiting or syncope, or an emergency department visit or readmission.
  • Unable to operate the communication and exercise applications independently.
  • Declined to take part in testing.

Treatment and study plan

Hybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation

Behavioral

Two weeks of centre-based cardiac rehabilitation, twice weekly (4 supervised sessions). Aerobic exercise is individually prescribed from the baseline cardiopulmonary exercise test at 60-80% of heart rate reserve and a rating of perceived exertion of 11-13, comprising 5-10 minutes of warm-up, 20-30 minutes of conditioning and 5-10 minutes of cool-down. Elastic-band resistance training is performed twice weekly. Participants are taught to self-monitor heart rate and perceived exertion and to use the communication software and cloud care platform. A repeat risk assessment is performed at the end of week 2; participants who remain at low risk then transition to 6 weeks of home-based rehabilitation comprising at least three aerobic and two resistance sessions weekly, with wrist heart-rate monitoring, an exercise-sharing platform, upload of home measurements, one telephone follow-up and two motivational text messages per week, and adjustment of the aerobic prescription as capacity improves.

Centre-based cardiac rehabilitation

Behavioral

Participants in this study will undergo an eight-week hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation program. They will attend sessions twice a week and receive one additional session of verbal encouragement for self-exercise. The program includes aerobic exercises tailored to individual fitness levels. Additionally, participants will engage in a weekly group session focusing on resistance training for 50 minutes, targeting major muscle groups with a perceived exertion level of 11-13. Throughout the program, exercise performance will be monitored, and aerobic exercise prescriptions will be adjusted as needed to ensure progress. Participants will also be required to maintain records of their self-exercise activities at home. Furthermore, educational articles and manuals will be provided to offer comprehensive care.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2).

    Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

    Measured by symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise testing on a cycle ergometer with breath-by-breath gas collection, expressed in mL/kg/min.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L index)

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks

    Change in health-related quality of life, measured with the EuroQol five-dimension five-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L).

    Responses were converted to a single index value using the Taiwan value set. The index ranges from -1.026 to 1.000, where 1.000 represents full health, 0 represents dead and negative values represent health states considered worse than dead. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.

  2. Change in medication adherence

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks

    Change in medication adherence, assessed with the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8). Responses were classified into three adherence levels scored 0 to 2, where 0 indicates low adherence, 1 medium adherence and 2 high adherence. Higher scores indicate better adherence.

  3. Number of participants who are current smokers

    Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

    Number of participants reporting current tobacco use.

  4. Change in body weight

    Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

    Change in body weight, measured in kilograms. Higher values indicate greater body weight.

  5. Number of participants with a cardiac or non-cardiac event

    Time frame: Through 8 weeks

    Number of participants with at least one cardiac or non-cardiac event, defined as an emergency department attendance or a hospital admission.

  6. Rehabilitation completion rate

    Time frame: 8 weeks

    Percentage of participants who completed at least 80% of the prescribed exercise sessions.

  7. Patient perspectives on the two rehabilitation models

    Time frame: 8 weeks

    Patient perspectives on the two rehabilitation models, collected by structured interview at the end-of-study assessment.

  8. Change in body mass index

    Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

    Change in body mass index, calculated as body weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in metres (kg/m^2). Higher values indicate greater body mass index.

  9. Change in self-rated health (EQ visual analogue scale)

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks

    Change in self-rated health on the EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ VAS), on which participants mark their health today on a vertical line ranging from 0 (the worst health you can imagine) to 100 (the best health you can imagine).

    Higher scores indicate better self-rated health.

Other outcomes

  1. Change in oxygen uptake at the anaerobic threshold.

    Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

    Change in oxygen uptake at the anaerobic threshold.

  2. Change in the slope of minute ventilation to carbon dioxide production (VE/VCO2 slope)

    Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

    Change in the slope of minute ventilation to carbon dioxide production (VE/VCO2 slope).

  3. Change in oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES).

    Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

    Change in oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES).

  4. Change in peak work rate.

    Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

    Change in peak work rate.

  5. Change in peak oxygen pulse.

    Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

    Change in peak oxygen pulse.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Cheng-Hsin General Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Hospital-to-Home Transitional Cardiac Rehabilitation as a Transition From Centre-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation After Cardiac Surgery: A Single-Blind Randomised Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2025
First posted
Sep 9, 2026
Registry last updated
Sep 9, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.