Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07810712

PNS Motor Stimulation Study

Paralysis is one of the most disabling features of Spinal cord injury and stroke. In select cases, where the nerve is intact, stimulation can achieve meaningful muscle contraction e.g. to restore grip and release function. Previously, products to serve this purpose had been developed and successfully implanted (Freehand device). However, they had technical and cost limitations and have gone out of production.

We aim to investigate if a simple implantable and commercially available system could replicate the same function.

Patients implanted with a wireless peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) system for chronic pain in the upper limb shall be identified and approached for consent. Surface electromyography (EMG, baseline and with active contraction) shall be performed to confirm intact motor nerves. Baseline MRC (Medical Research Council Scale for Muscle Strength) grade shall be assessed. PNS shall be programmed to produce muscle contraction (within FDA approved safe limits for the device) with the EMG monitoring. The muscle contraction shall be recorded on video for further evaluation. Strength of contraction shall be assessed on the MRC scale. Stimulation parameters shall be then re-adjusted to pain-relief setting. Neurological examination shall be performed and return to baseline EMG ascertained.

Data shall be analysed and the Study shall end when the data for the last participant shall be gathered.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust

Liverpool, L9 7LJ, United Kingdom

About this study

Paralysis is one of the most disabling features of Spinal cord injury and stroke. In select cases, where the nerve is intact, stimulation can achieve meaningful muscle contraction e.g. to restore grip and release function. Previously, products to serve this purpose had been developed and successfully implanted (Freehand device). However, they had technical and cost limitations and have gone out of production. This concept of functional electrical stimulation has also been utilised with external orthoses, however the applicability has been limited both due to the precision required in applying the external device each time and the need of someone else to put this on, defeating the purpose.

We aim to investigate if a simple implantable and commercially available system could replicate the same function. Curonix (formerly StimWave) wireless PNS is one such system that is already CE marked and FDA approved for stimulation of peripheral nerves. It is currently used for stimulation of peripheral nerves for pain relief.

During programming for the same, to check for adequate placement, motor stimulation is routinely performed which elicits corresponding muscle twitch. Even though the parameters are approved for safety, it has not been used to generate a clinically meaningful sustained muscle contraction.

Patients implanted with a wireless peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) system for chronic pain in the upper limb shall be identified and approached for consent. Surface electromyography (EMG, baseline and with active contraction) shall be performed to confirm intact motor nerves. Baseline MRC (Medical Research Council Scale for Muscle Strength) grade shall be assessed. PNS shall be programmed to produce muscle contraction (within FDA approved safe limits for the device) with the EMG monitoring. The muscle contraction shall be recorded on video for further evaluation. Strength of contraction shall be assessed on the MRC scale. Stimulation parameters shall be then re-adjusted to pain-relief setting. Neurological examination shall be performed and return to baseline EMG ascertained.

Data shall be analysed and the Study shall end when the data for the last participant shall be gathered.

If proven to be successful, the Curonix wireless PNS system has the potential capability for generating voice controlled coordinated contraction of 2-3 electrodes, all of which can be placed under local anaesthetic as day case. A system has also been developed in parallel to provide sensory feedback which will automatically adjust the strength of contraction so that the grip is adequate.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or Female, aged 18 years or above with implanted Curonix (formerly: Stimwave) PNS for radial, ulnar or median nerve;
  • Functioning lower motor neuron (LMN) pathway determined by baseline EMG.

Exclusion criteria

  • Age <18yr;
  • Myopathy and other LMN disorders;
  • Impaired LMN pathway determined by EMG.

Treatment and study plan

Stimulation of the motor unit

Procedure

A participant shall have their PNS implant to produce muscle contraction. The device shall be programmed within safe, FDA-approved limits. The contraction shall be assessed visually, with EMG and on MRC scale.

Primary outcomes

  1. MRC grade

    Time frame: 2 minutes before the stimulation; during the stimulation (1 minute) and 5 minutes after the stimulation is ceased.

    Medical Research Council (MRC) Scale for Muscle Strength shall be assessed before the intervention, with the intervention ongoing and after it is completed.

    The MRC scale is as follows:

    Grade 5: Normal strength Grade 4: Movement against gravity and resistance Grade 3: Movement against gravity over (almost) the full range Grade 2: Movement of the limb but not against gravity Grade 1: Visible contraction without movement of the limb Grade 0: No visible contraction

    The difference between active (baseline) muscle contraction and contraction achieved with the device shall be calculated.

  2. EMG

    Time frame: 2 minutes before the stimulation; during the stimulation (1 minute) and 5 minutes after the stimulation is ceased.

    Surface, non-invasive EMG shall be performed to assess the selected muscle before the intervention, with the intervention ongoing and after it is completed.

    The assessed parameter is the amplitude [μV].

    The difference between active (baseline) muscle contraction and contraction achieved with the device shall be calculated.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Determination of Efficacy of Sustained Motor Contraction Generated Using StimWave Peripheral Nerve Stimulator

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Sep 9, 2026
Registry last updated
Sep 9, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.