Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not yet recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07809828

Driving Performance in Parkinson's Disease and Multiple Sclerosis Using a Driving Simulator

This prospective observational study investigates whether driving performance measured in a standardized driving simulator differs between people with Parkinson's disease, people with multiple sclerosis, and healthy drivers.

Participants will complete a standardized simulated driving assessment designed to evaluate abilities relevant to safe driving, including lane keeping, speed control, vehicle following, responses to hazards, lane changes, navigation, and compliance with traffic rules. Driving simulator measures will also be examined in relation to clinical characteristics and results from previously performed cognitive, motor, and psychodiagnostic assessments in the patient groups.

The main research question is whether a driving simulator can detect measurable patterns of driving performance associated with Parkinson's disease or multiple sclerosis when compared with healthy drivers. The study hypothesis is that participants with these neurological conditions will show differences in selected driving performance measures and that some of these differences will be associated with the clinical severity and functional manifestations of their disease.

The study will also explore whether additional information from eye tracking, video-based measurements, and physiological signals can improve the characterization of driving performance. The results are intended to support the development of objective methods for studying driving-related functions in neurological disease. Simulator results will be used for research purposes and will not by themselves determine an individual's medical fitness to drive.

Not yet recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

About this study

NeuroSimDrive is a prospective observational comparative driving-simulator study designed to characterize driving performance in people with Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis using a standardized simulator-based assessment. The study integrates simulator-derived driving data with clinical and functional information already available from previous assessments performed in the participating patient cohorts.

The clinical groups consist of participants with established neurological diagnoses who previously completed psychodiagnostic and screening assessments within an earlier research framework. These pre-existing data include measures of cognitive, attentional, motor, and other functions potentially relevant to driving performance. The simulator study does not use these previous test results as a basis for exclusion; instead, they will be incorporated as explanatory variables when interpreting simulator performance.

A central methodological feature of the study is standardization of the participant's clinical condition at the time of simulator testing. All patients undergo neurological assessment on the day of the simulator session to verify clinical stability and to document factors that could influence driving performance. In participants with multiple sclerosis, disability is characterized using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), including relevant functional system scores. In participants with Parkinson's disease, motor status is characterized using the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III (MDS-UPDRS III) and Hoehn and Yahr staging. Parkinson's disease participants are assessed during the best practically achievable ON-medication state, with timing of dopaminergic medication and simulator testing documented to improve interpretability of the driving data.

Visual and auditory function are assessed before simulator testing because sensory impairment may affect the validity and interpretation of driving performance. Specialized ophthalmologic assessment, including visual field testing, and audiometric assessment are therefore incorporated into the clinical characterization of the patient groups.

Before the simulator session patients are also screened by Montreal Cognitive Assessment.

The simulator session includes standardized instructions, an adaptation period, and a structured driving scenario. The adaptation period allows participants to become familiar with the simulator controls and virtual environment and provides an opportunity to assess tolerance of the simulation before the evaluated part of the session begins. The expected duration of the simulator component, including instructions and adaptation, is approximately 30 to 60 minutes.

The driving scenario is composed of predefined modules representing common and safety-relevant driving demands. These include baseline driving, lane-changing situations, urban driving, intersections, hazard events, roundabouts, motorway entry, vehicle following, multilane driving, reduced-visibility conditions, and a short repeated module. The same simulator configuration, scenario structure, instructions, and technical conditions are intended to be used across the study groups to maximize comparability.

The simulator continuously records vehicle-control and driving-behavior data, including steering input, pedal use, vehicle speed, lateral position, vehicle trajectory, distance and time relationships to surrounding traffic, and event-related responses. The technical infrastructure may additionally include a camera system, eye tracking, a chest-worn physiological sensor, and a microphone, depending on the final validated study configuration. These additional systems are intended to provide complementary information about visual attention, head and eye movements, selected motor manifestations, physiological responses, and verbal reactions where applicable.

Simulator and sensor data will be time-synchronized and linked to predefined driving segments and events. This allows driving behavior to be examined in relation to the specific demands of each scenario rather than only as an overall session average. Technical validity, completeness of the recording, reasons for interruption, and relevant clinical conditions at the time of testing will be documented for each simulator session.

Healthy control participants are assessed by the technology partner using the same simulator and the same standardized driving scenario under comparable technical and organizational conditions. The control group provides a reference population for interpretation of simulator-derived driving patterns observed in the neurological cohorts.

The study is exploratory and hypothesis-generating in nature. Analyses will focus on group-level differences in simulator-derived driving behavior and on associations between driving performance and clinical, cognitive, motor, and functional characteristics. Additional exploratory analyses may assess whether multimodal data from video, eye tracking, or physiological monitoring provide information beyond conventional simulator telemetry.

Because of the pilot sample size, interpretation will emphasize effect sizes, confidence intervals, feasibility, tolerability, and the consistency of observed performance patterns rather than the establishment of definitive diagnostic thresholds. The study is not designed to provide an individual medical or legal determination of fitness to drive. Simulator findings will be interpreted as research data and not as stand-alone decisions regarding a participant's driving license or medical driving eligibility.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 to 85 years.
  • Ability to understand study instructions and provide written informed consent.
  • Valid driving license for passenger vehicles (Category B or equivalent).
  • Active non-professional driving of a motor vehicle.
  • Ability to understand the instructions and complete the standardized driving simulator assessment.

For participants with multiple sclerosis:

  • Confirmed diagnosis of multiple sclerosis according to applicable diagnostic criteria.
  • Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score less than 6.5.
  • Clinically stable disease at the time of simulator assessment.
  • At least 6 weeks since the most recent multiple sclerosis relapse and any corticosteroid treatment for relapse.
  • Previous completion of the psychodiagnostic and screening assessment used in the preceding OP-JAK research framework (NCT07360886) within 6 months before simulator testing, provided that no clinically relevant deterioration has occurred.
  • Completion of the required neurological, ophthalmological, visual-field, and audiometric assessments before or on the day of simulator testing, as specified by the study protocol.

For participants with Parkinson's disease:

  • Confirmed diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease.
  • Hoehn and Yahr less than stage IV in the ON-medication state.
  • Clinically stable condition at the time of simulator assessment.
  • Ability to undergo simulator testing during the best practically achievable ON-medication state.
  • Previous completion of the psychodiagnostic and screening assessment used in the preceding OP-JAK research framework within 6 months before simulator testing, provided that no clinically relevant deterioration has occurred.
  • Completion of the required neurological, ophthalmological, visual-field, and audiometric assessments before or on the day of simulator testing, as specified by the study protocol.

For healthy control participants:

  • No known neurological disorder expected to substantially affect driving performance.
  • Self-reported current health status compatible with safe completion of the driving simulator assessment.
  • Visual and auditory function, with usual correction if applicable, sufficient to safely and validly complete the simulator assessment.

Exclusion criteria

  • Acute medical or neurological deterioration that would prevent safe or valid completion of the driving simulator assessment.
  • Current intoxication with alcohol or other psychoactive substances.
  • Marked sleep deprivation, excessive fatigue, or another temporary condition that, in the judgment of the responsible study personnel, would substantially impair the ability to complete testing safely and validly.
  • Severe simulator sickness or current vestibular symptoms that prevent completion of simulator testing.
  • Clinically significant uncorrected visual or auditory impairment that prevents valid completion of the simulator assessment.

Inability to understand study instructions or safely operate the driving simulator.

  • Withdrawal of consent or refusal of data recording required for the study when no technically valid alternative method is available.

Additional exclusion criteria for participants with multiple sclerosis:

  • Current multiple sclerosis relapse.
  • Less than 30 days since the most recent relapse or corticosteroid treatment for relapse.
  • EDSS score > 6.5.

Additional exclusion criteria for participants with Parkinson's disease:

  • Atypical parkinsonian syndrome.
  • Hoehn and Yahr stage > 4 in the ON-medication state.
  • Deep brain stimulation in the main Parkinson's disease cohort.
  • Clinical condition preventing testing during a sufficiently stable ON-medication period.

Additional exclusion criteria for healthy control participants:

  • Self-reported neurological disease or other health condition expected to substantially influence cognitive, sensory, or motor functions relevant to driving.
  • Current psychiatric or medical condition that would prevent safe or valid completion of the simulator assessment.
  • Current use of substances or medications producing an acute level of impairment incompatible with safe simulator testing.

Treatment and study plan

Standardized Driving Simulator Assessment

Other

Participants undergo a standardized driving simulator assessment consisting of an adaptation period followed by a structured simulated driving scenario. The scenario includes baseline driving, lane keeping and lane changes, urban driving, intersections, hazard events, roundabouts, motorway entry, vehicle following, multilane driving, and reduced-visibility conditions. Simulator telemetry records vehicle speed, steering and pedal inputs, lateral position, trajectory, following distance, time-to-collision, reaction times, and other driving-performance parameters. Depending on the validated technical configuration, synchronized video, eye-tracking, physiological, and audio data may also be collected. The assessment is performed for research purposes and is not a therapeutic intervention or a stand-alone diagnostic or fitness-to-drive test.

Primary outcomes

  1. Standard Deviation of Lateral Position During Lane-Keeping

    Time frame: During the single standardized driving simulator assessment, approximately 30-60 minutes

    Standard deviation of the lateral position of the participant's vehicle relative to the center of the driving lane during predefined lane-maintenance segments. The measure will be derived from continuous simulator telemetry and expressed in meters. Higher values indicate greater variability in lateral vehicle control.

  2. Brake Reaction Time to Standardized Driving Hazards

    Time frame: During standardized hazard events within the single driving simulator assessment, approximately 30-60 minutes

    Time from the onset of a predefined hazardous traffic event to initiation of braking by the participant. Standardized hazards may include sudden braking of a lead vehicle, a pedestrian entering the roadway, or a vehicle entering from a side road. Reaction time will be derived from synchronized simulator event and pedal telemetry and expressed in seconds. Longer reaction times indicate a slower braking response.

  3. Mean Time Headway During Vehicle-Following

    Time frame: During predefined car-following segments within the single driving simulator assessment, approximately 30-60 minutes

    Mean time interval between the participant's vehicle and a predefined lead vehicle during standardized car-following segments. Time headway will be calculated from simulator telemetry and expressed in seconds. Lower values indicate shorter following distances and potentially reduced safety margins.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Standard Deviation of Vehicle Speed

    Time frame: During predefined speed-maintenance segments within the single driving simulator assessment, approximately 30-60 minutes

    Standard deviation of vehicle speed during predefined driving segments with a specified speed limit. The measure will be expressed in kilometers per hour and will characterize the participant's ability to maintain stable speed.

  2. Gas-to-Brake Transition Time

    Time frame: During predefined braking events within the single driving simulator assessment, approximately 30-60 minutes

    Time interval between release of the accelerator pedal and initiation of brake-pedal depression during predefined events requiring braking. The measure will be derived from simulator pedal telemetry and expressed in seconds. Longer intervals indicate slower transition between accelerator and brake control.

  3. Minimum Time-to-Collision During Critical Traffic Events

    Time frame: During predefined critical traffic events within the single driving simulator assessment, approximately 30-60 minutes

    Minimum estimated time remaining before collision with another road user or vehicle during predefined critical traffic situations, assuming the instantaneous relative trajectories are maintained. The measure will be calculated from simulator telemetry and expressed in seconds. Lower values indicate a smaller safety margin.

  4. Number of Unsafe or Unsuccessful Lane Changes

    Time frame: During predefined lane-change scenarios within the single driving simulator assessment, approximately 30-60 minutes

    Number of predefined lane-change maneuvers that are not completed successfully or are performed under unsafe conditions according to prespecified simulator criteria, including inadequate gap selection, conflict with surrounding traffic, or failure to complete the instructed maneuver.

  5. Number of Traffic Rule Violations

    Time frame: During the single standardized driving simulator assessment, approximately 30-60 minutes

    Total number of predefined traffic-rule violations recorded during the simulator assessment, including red-light or stop-sign violations, failure to yield, speeding events, and incorrect lane use. Events will be automatically recorded or derived from synchronized simulator telemetry according to prespecified scenario rules.

  6. Number of Collisions During Simulated Driving

    Time frame: During the single standardized driving simulator assessment, approximately 30-60 minutes

    Total number of collisions occurring during the standardized simulator assessment. Collisions may additionally be categorized according to the object involved, such as another vehicle, pedestrian, or road infrastructure.

  7. Steering Wheel Angle Variability

    Time frame: During predefined driving segments within the single driving simulator assessment, approximately 30-60 minutes

    Variability of steering-wheel angle during predefined driving segments, quantified using the standard deviation of steering-wheel angle. Higher values indicate greater variability in steering input and may reflect less stable vehicle control.

  8. Steering Smoothness

    Time frame: During predefined steering-demand segments within the single driving simulator assessment, approximately 30-60 minutes

    Smoothness of steering control derived from the temporal characteristics of steering-wheel movement, including steering jerk calculated from steering kinematics. Higher jerk values indicate less smooth steering control.

Other outcomes

  1. Visual Scanning Behavior During Simulated Driving

    Time frame: During the single standardized driving simulator assessment, approximately 30-60 minutes

    Eye-tracking-derived characteristics of visual scanning during driving, including fixation and gaze behavior toward traffic-relevant areas and, where technically valid, observation of mirrors and blind spots. Specific eye-tracking metrics will be calculated only for recordings meeting predefined technical quality requirements.

  2. Mirror and Blind-Spot Observation During Driving Maneuvers

    Time frame: During predefined lane-change and turning maneuvers within the single driving simulator assessment, approximately 30-60 minutes

    Frequency and timing of mirror and blind-spot checks before predefined lane changes or turning maneuvers, derived from validated eye-tracking and/or video recordings. The measure will characterize visual exploration of the surrounding traffic environment before a maneuver

  3. Heart Rate During Simulated Driving

    Time frame: During the single standardized driving simulator assessment, approximately 30-60 minutes

    Heart rate recorded using a chest-worn physiological sensor during the simulator assessment. Physiological data will be analyzed only when technically valid recordings are available and may be examined in relation to predefined driving events and task demands.

  4. Completion of the Standardized Driving Simulator Assessment

    Time frame: From start of simulator adaptation to completion or premature termination of the simulator session, approximately 30-60 minutes

    Proportion of participants who complete the planned simulator assessment without premature termination. Reasons for discontinuation, including simulator sickness, dizziness, fatigue, anxiety, participant request, clinical decision, or technical failure, will be documented.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Ladislav Stanke

CONTACT

[email protected]

+420 588 443 713

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Olomouc

Other

Collaborators

  • Digiteq Automotive

Registry information

Official study title

Simulator-Based Assessment of Driving Performance in Patients With Parkinson's Disease and Multiple Sclerosis

Acronym: NeuroSimDrive

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Sep 9, 2026
Registry last updated
Sep 9, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.