Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not yet recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07807904

NanoSALV vs Standard Topical Care Pathway in Sports-Related Skin Lesions

This randomized, double-blind, two-arm parallel trial evaluates the efficacy of NanoSALV Catalytic for treating acute, sport-related friction blisters in ultra-distance runners. NanoSALV is an advanced wound care technology designed to engage the body's copper-dependent healing pathways, offering a novel approach compared to conventional products that rely solely on moisture balance or infection control.

The primary objective is to determine whether NanoSALV Catalytic increases the rate of reduction in friction blister area (mm²) over a 14-day treatment period compared to a Standard Topical Care Pathway. Secondary objectives assess the time to complete healing, the proportion of blisters healed by Day 14, self-reported pain, participant satisfaction, post-event running activity, and the incidence of adverse events.

The study aims to enroll 100 otherwise injury-free participants (aged 18-65) who develop at least one acute friction blister following an ultra-distance running event in Alberta. Participants are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either NanoSALV Catalytic (Arm A) or a Standard Topical Care Pathway (Arm B). To maintain blinding, both groups are provided with identical unbranded tubes and standard hydrocolloid blister dressings.

Participants self-administer the treatment daily for 14 days. At each daily dressing change, participants photograph the index blister alongside a true-to-size scale marker and submit the images through a secure, PIPEDA-compliant platform. To ensure objective results, digital image metadata is scrubbed, and the lesion area is traced and measured using digital software by a blinded researcher. A blinded plastic surgeon provides clinical observations and determines final healing status. Participants also complete electronic surveys to record daily pain levels, running activity, and adverse events, concluding with an end-of-treatment survey to evaluate overall satisfaction.

The primary outcome will be analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model to compare the rate of blister area reduction between the two treatment arms over time.

Not yet recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Age and Demographics: Male or female adults between the ages of 18 and 65 years.

Justification: This range captures the standard demographic of the target athletic population. It also ensures all participants are legally capable of providing independent informed consent while minimizing extreme age-related confounding factors that could independently alter skin integrity and wound healing rates.

Target Condition and Activity: Participants must have completed an ultra-distance running event and present to the research team with at least one acute friction blister.

Justification: Ultra-distance running provides an ideal, highly reliable environment for investigating this application, as athletes frequently develop severe friction blisters during these competitions despite utilizing preventative measures. Targeting this specific event type ensures a relevant, homogeneous sample for comparing the localized time to healing between the study interventions.

General Health Status: Participants must be otherwise injury-free.

Justification: Ensuring participants do not have concurrent acute or severe musculoskeletal injuries minimizes confounding variables. Secondary injuries could alter systemic inflammatory responses, subjective pain perception, or overall recovery timelines, which would make it difficult to isolate the specific localized effects of NanoSALV Catalytic and the Standard Topical Care Pathway.

Capacity to Complete Remote Data Collection: Participants must be willing and able to photograph the index lesion at each dressing change over the 14-day treatment period using their own smartphone, to complete a short questionnaire at each scheduled assessment, and to use the secure image transmission platform (Brightsquid Secure Mail).

Justification: All outcome data are collected remotely after enrolment, with no scheduled in-person study visit. A participant who cannot reliably photograph the lesion and transmit images securely cannot contribute to the primary outcome.

Exclusion criteria

Known Allergies or Sensitivities to Study Interventions: Individuals with a known allergy to any active or inactive ingredients utilized in either treatment arm, including bacitracin, polymyxin B, gramicidin, petrolatum, or copper-based compounds.

Justification: This is a primary safety measure to prevent severe allergic contact dermatitis or systemic hypersensitivity reactions. To maintain the double-blinded integrity of the study, the screening process will not ask participants about specific brand names directly. Instead, participants will be screened using a consolidated list of specific ingredients present across all products to ensure potential allergens are avoided without revealing the exact nature of the interventions.

Underlying Medical Conditions Affecting Wound Healing: Individuals with systemic conditions known to impair tissue repair or alter skin integrity, such as diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, or autoimmune disorders.

Justification: These conditions inherently alter physiological healing timelines and subjective sensory perception (e.g., peripheral neuropathy). Excluding these individuals controls for significant confounding variables, ensuring that any statistical differences in healing time can be directly attributed to the topical interventions.

Pre-existing Severe Infection of the Target Lesion: Participants presenting with friction blisters that already exhibit clinical signs of severe or systemic infection, such as excessive purulent discharge, spreading erythema, or red streaking, prior to group assignment.

Justification: Wounds with severe pre-existing infections require immediate standard medical care, such as oral antibiotics. Including these lesions would compromise participant safety and skew the baseline healing trajectory compared to standard, acute friction blisters.

Concurrent Use of Alternative Wound Treatments: Individuals currently utilizing other topical antibiotics, corticosteroid creams, or systemic immunosuppressive medications.

Justification: The concurrent use of active pharmacological agents introduces confounding treatment effects. This would make it scientifically impossible to isolate the primary main effect of NanoSALV Catalytic or the Standard Topical Care Pathway on the wound area.

Presence of Acute or Severe Musculoskeletal Injuries: Individuals who sustained major acute injuries during the ultra-distance event.

Justification: Secondary trauma alters systemic inflammatory responses and subjective pain perception. This systemic noise complicates the localized subjective assessments, such as the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain perception.

Pregnancy or Breastfeeding: Individuals who are pregnant or breastfeeding.

Justification: This is a contraindicated population for the standard, over-the-counter components utilized in the Standard Topical Care Pathway.

Blood Blisters: Lesions that are blood blisters rather than clear friction blisters are not eligible to serve as the index lesion.

Justification: Blood blisters involve dermal vessel injury and follow a different physiological healing trajectory. Including them would introduce heterogeneity into the primary outcome.

Treatment and study plan

NanoSALV Catalytic

Device

NanoSALV Catalytic is an advanced skin and wound care technology featuring a proprietary catalytic surface. It is designed to engage the body's copper-dependent healing pathways to promote healing, modulate inflammation, and provide broad-spectrum antimicrobial protection.

Stage 1 & 2 (Days 1 to 14): Participants receive NanoSALV Catalytic for the entire 14-day treatment period. To maintain the double-blind design and match the two-stage administration of the active comparator, NanoSALV Catalytic is supplied in two unbranded, coded tubes (Tube 1 for Days 1-7; Tube 2 for Days 8-14).

Administration: Participants apply a thin layer of NanoSALV Catalytic to the index friction blister every 24 hours. Immediately following application, the lesion is covered with a standard hydrocolloid blister dressing. Both the written instructions and the packaging are identical to those provided to the comparator arm.

Standard Topical Care Pathway

Drug

The Standard Topical Care Pathway is a two-stage topical treatment regimen administered over a fixed 14-day period.

Stage 1 (Days 1 to 7): Participants apply a standard over-the-counter topical antibiotic ointment.

Stage 2 (Days 8 to 14): Participants transition to applying a standard white petroleum jelly. This two-stage approach is utilized to ensure the topical antibiotic is not used beyond its authorized 7-day indication.

Administration: Participants apply a thin layer of the designated topical product to the index friction blister every 24 hours. Immediately following application, the lesion is covered with a standard hydrocolloid blister dressing.

Blinding: To maintain the double-blind study design, the Standard Topical Care Pathway is provided to participants in two unbranded, coded tubes (Tube 1 for Days 1-7; Tube 2 for Days 8-14) that are visually indistinguishable from the investigational product packaging.

Primary outcomes

  1. Blister Area

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 14 days

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Shahab Alizadeh

Other

Collaborators

  • Canadian Sport Institute Alberta

Registry information

Official study title

Evaluating the Efficacy of NanoSALV Catalytic Compared to a Standard Topical Care Pathway in Sports-Related Skin Lesions

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Sep 8, 2026
Registry last updated
Sep 8, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.