Taipei Medical University Hospital
Taipei, 110, Taiwan
NCT Number: NCT07806669
Complete dentures have a long history and remain one of the principal treatment options for patients with complete edentulism. However, conventional fabrication involves a complex series of clinical and laboratory procedures, and the final prosthesis cannot be reproduced with complete accuracy. With recent advances in digital dentistry, integrating digital technologies into complete denture fabrication has become an important area of research. Current evidence indicates that digitally fabricated three-dimensional (3D)-printed complete dentures can reduce the number of clinical procedures and shorten treatment time. Nevertheless, clinical evidence comparing the performance of conventionally fabricated and digitally fabricated 3D-printed complete dentures remains limited. Therefore, this study aims to compare the advantages and disadvantages of these two types of complete dentures using various subjective and objective outcome measures after each participant has used both dentures for a specified period.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Taipei, 110, Taiwan
Several studies have evaluated the adaptation of 3D-printed dentures. Comparisons involving different printing techniques and printing orientations have demonstrated that the adaptation of 3D-printed dentures is comparable to that of dentures fabricated using the conventional pack-and-press technique. An intraoral clinical study also demonstrated that digitally fabricated dentures, whether produced through 3D printing or milling, provide sufficient accuracy and intraoral adaptation for clinical use.
During the processing of conventional complete dentures, substantial material deformation may occur during flasking and polymerization. This deformation can cause displacement of the artificial teeth and result in occlusal discrepancies. A clinical study by Saurabh et al. reported that digitally fabricated dentures resulted in less displacement of the artificial teeth and required fewer adjustments after fabrication than conventional dentures.
Digital technologies for removable denture fabrication continue to evolve, with ongoing improvements in both accuracy and material strength. Nevertheless, additional studies are required to clarify the differences in their actual clinical performance.
In that study, intraoral scanning was used to obtain impressions for digital denture fabrication. For edentulous ridges, impressions obtained exclusively through intraoral scanning may provide less adequate border extension than conventional impressions made using custom trays. This is because the oral mucosa and surrounding soft tissues are mobile, making the scanning conditions fundamentally different from those encountered during the fabrication of fixed prostheses. Therefore, complete dentures fabricated solely from intraoral scans may have less favorable border extension and peripheral sealing than conventionally fabricated dentures, potentially resulting in reduced stability and masticatory efficiency.
In another intraoral clinical study, a custom tray was fabricated following a preliminary impression using the conventional workflow. Border molding and a definitive impression were subsequently performed intraorally. After the master cast was produced and the artificial teeth were arranged, the denture setup was scanned to create a standard tessellation language (STL) file. The same digital file was then used to fabricate both a 3D-printed denture and a milled denture. After the patients had worn each denture for a specified period, the two dentures were compared. Patient satisfaction with both digital dentures was greater than that with their existing dentures. The digital dentures also demonstrated favorable intraoral stability, comfort, esthetics, speech, and occlusal performance.
These findings indicate that the quality of digital dentures is sufficiently stable and acceptable for clinical use. However, the intraoral performance of the definitive denture depends on obtaining an accurate and complete impression and recording the maxillomandibular relationship precisely. Although conventional procedures can provide a complete definitive impression, they do not reduce the number or duration of clinical procedures. Therefore, it is important to investigate how digital technologies can be integrated into the conventional complete denture workflow to obtain complete and accurate impressions, reduce the number of patient visits, and produce definitive dentures whose clinical performance is comparable to that of conventionally fabricated dentures.
Group 1: Participants will first wear conventionally fabricated complete dentures for six weeks and will subsequently wear digitally fabricated 3D-printed complete dentures for six weeks. Questionnaires and clinical performance assessments will be administered after each six-week intervention period.
Group 2: Participants will first wear digitally fabricated 3D-printed complete dentures for six weeks and will subsequently wear conventionally fabricated complete dentures for six weeks. Questionnaires and clinical performance assessments will be administered after each six-week intervention period.
Clinical Procedures Conventional complete denture workflow
At the first visit, preliminary impressions will be obtained using alginate, and diagnostic casts will be produced. Custom acrylic resin impression trays will subsequently be fabricated using autopolymerizing resin (Ostron, GC Co.).
At the second visit, border molding will be performed using the custom trays and thermoplastic border-molding compound (Peri Compound, GC Co.). Definitive impressions will then be obtained using a silicone impression material (Exadenture, GC Co.), and the master casts will be produced. Record bases and occlusion rims will subsequently be fabricated on the master casts.
At the third visit, the record bases and occlusion rims will be used to determine the occlusal vertical dimension and record the centric relation. The master casts will then be mounted on an articulator, and the artificial teeth will be arranged.
At the fourth visit, the trial dentures will be evaluated intraorally to assess esthetics, speech, and occlusion. If no problems are identified, the dentures will be processed using the conventional flasking and heat-polymerization technique.
At the fifth visit, the definitive dentures will be adjusted and delivered. Follow-up adjustments will be performed 24 hours, three days, and one week after denture delivery. After the participant has worn the dentures for six weeks, clinical performance assessments will be conducted, and fabrication of the second set of dentures will begin.
Digital complete denture workflow
At the first visit, preliminary impressions will be obtained using alginate, and diagnostic casts will be produced. The casts will be digitized using a 3Shape scanning system. Record bases will then be designed digitally and fabricated using a 3D printer (NextDent 5100) and a printable material (NextDent Try-In). Wax occlusion rims will subsequently be fabricated on the printed record bases.
At the second visit, the record bases and occlusion rims will be used to determine the occlusal vertical dimension. Border molding and peripheral sealing will be performed using a thermoplastic border-molding compound. A definitive closed-mouth impression will then be obtained using a silicone impression material while the participant occludes at the predetermined vertical dimension. The dental midline and occlusal plane will be marked on the occlusion rims, and facial photographs will be obtained.
After the master casts are produced from the definitive impressions, they will be scanned to create STL files. The facial photographs will be integrated into the denture design software to assist with the digital arrangement of the artificial teeth. After completion of the design, the definitive complete dentures will be fabricated directly using a 3D printer and NextDent Denture 3D+ material.
At the third visit, the dentures will be evaluated intraorally, the occlusion will be adjusted, and the definitive dentures will be delivered. Follow-up adjustments will be performed 24 hours, three days, and one week after denture delivery. Clinical performance assessments will be conducted after the participant has worn the dentures for six weeks. At the end of the study, each participant will be allowed to select the set of dentures that they prefer to continue wearing.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants will receive maxillary and mandibular complete dentures fabricated using a conventional workflow. The procedure includes preliminary alginate impressions, fabrication of custom impression trays, border molding, definitive impressions, recording of the maxillomandibular relationship, trial denture evaluation, and conventional flasking and heat-polymerization. Participants will wear the conventional complete dentures for six weeks. Clinical adjustments will be performed 24 hours, three days, and one week after denture delivery. Subjective and objective outcome assessments will be conducted at the end of the six-week intervention period.
articipants will receive maxillary and mandibular complete dentures fabricated using a digital workflow. Diagnostic casts will be scanned, and 3D-printed record bases and occlusion rims will be used to record the maxillomandibular relationship and obtain closed-mouth definitive impressions following border molding. The master casts and facial photographs will be digitized and used for computer-aided denture design. The definitive complete dentures will be fabricated using a 3D-printing system. Participants will wear the 3D-printed complete dentures for six weeks. Clinical adjustments will be performed 24 hours, three days, and one week after denture delivery. Subjective and objective outcome assessments will be conducted at the end of the six-week intervention period.
Time frame: Immediately after delivery and at the end of each 6-week intervention period
he master casts and the intaglio surfaces of the corresponding definitive complete dentures will be scanned to generate STL files. Each denture scan will be superimposed on its corresponding master cast scan using 3D analysis software. The root mean square deviation between the two surfaces will be calculated in millimeters to assess and compare the dimensional accuracy of conventionally fabricated and 3D-printed complete dentures. A lower deviation indicates greater dimensional accuracy.
The master casts produced from the conventional custom-tray impression and the closed-mouth impression will be scanned to generate STL files. The two tissue surfaces will be superimposed using 3D analysis software. The root mean square deviation between the surfaces will be calculated in millimeters to quantify the differences between the two impression techniques.
Time frame: Immediately after delivery and at the end of each 6-week intervention period
Maximum occlusal force will be evaluated using pressure-sensitive dental film (Dental Prescale II, GC Co.) immediately after denture delivery and after six months of denture use. The film will be placed intraorally, and participants will be instructed to bite firmly for three minutes. The film will then be removed and scanned. The pressure-induced color changes will be analyzed using the corresponding software to calculate the maximum occlusal force. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: Immediately after delivery and at the end of each 6-week intervention period
Masticatory performance will be evaluated using color-changeable chewing gum. In accordance with the manufacturer's instructions, participants will chew the gum once per second for 60 seconds, alternating between the left and right sides for a total of 30 chewing cycles on each side. The chewed gum will then be placed on the color scale (from 1 to 10 )provided by the manufacturer, photographed, and analyzed using the corresponding software to obtain a masticatory performance score. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: Immediately after delivery and at the end of each 6-week intervention period
Participants will complete two questionnaires immediately after denture delivery and after wearing each type of denture for six months.
The first questionnaire will assess patient satisfaction with the dentures. It will comprise 12 items concerning denture use and clinical performance. For each item, participants will indicate their level of satisfaction by marking a point on a 10-cm visual analog scale. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: Immediately after delivery and at the end of each 6-week intervention period
he second questionnaire, the Oral Health Impact Profile for Edentulous Patients (OHIP-EDENT), will assess oral health-related quality of life. It will comprise 19 items addressing the effects of denture use on participants' daily activities, psychological well-being, and social functioning. Each item will be rated on a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Taipei Medical University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07804823
Complete Edentulism
Asyut, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07701200
All-on-4, Complete Edentulism
Al Mansurah, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07184320
Complete Edentulism, Partial Denture
Ajman, Ajman Emirate, United Arab Emirates
View Trial DetailsNCT07642128
Complete Edentulism, Randomized Clinical Trial
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial Details