Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07806097

Self-Directed Upper Extremity Gaming in Inpatients With Stroke

STRIVE uses a camera mounted on the in-room TV and a connected laptop to track arm and hand movements during gameplay via markerless motion capture. No controllers or wearable sensors are required, and patients initiate a session with a single button on the TV remote. Games target clinically relevant movements such as reaching and grasping, with difficulty adapting to the user.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

Chicago, Illinois, 60611-3167, United States

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Rachel A Kalvakota, OTD, OTR/L

CONTACT

[email protected]

3122383947

About this study

This is a prospective, single-arm feasibility study using a four-phase co-design protocol adapted from Clanchy et al. Phase 1 (n=20): inpatient stroke survivors complete one supervised session; think-aloud methods capture usability barriers. Phase 2: a multidisciplinary translation team rates issues on clinical significance and technical feasibility. Phase 3: prioritized issues are translated into design changes, producing STRIVEv2, with each change traceable to a user-identified barrier. Phase 4 (n=20): a separate group uses STRIVEv2 over three or more consecutive daily sessions under naturalistic conditions to evaluate usability readiness.

An occupational therapist sets up equipment, calibrates, and runs a supervised practice session so participants can start, pause, and stop safely. Sessions occur only when participants are awake, alert, and medically stable. The system logs only de-identified session metadata (timestamps, duration, active play time, task attempts and completions, game scores). No video, audio, or images are recorded.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • admitted for IP stroke rehabilitation ARAT >5 and <40 at enrollment
  • sufficient cognition and vision to follow simple instructions
  • medically stable for independent seated or supine UE activity

Exclusion criteria

  • severe neglect that prevents task engagement
  • significant aphasia that prevents understanding of instructions
  • medical contraindications to unsupervised UE activity as determined by the treating team

Treatment and study plan

Self-Directed Therapeutic Rehab using In-room Virtual Entertainment (STRIVE)

Other

In-room upper extremity gaming system using markerless motion tracking

Primary outcomes

  1. Observational Notes

    Time frame: During every session throughout phase 1 (months 3-4) --and during at least 2 sessions for every participant during phase 4 (months 15-18)

    Taken by study staff during session. Notes are entered into structured template.

  2. Adherence Notes

    Time frame: Throughout all sessions during phase 4 (months 15-18)

    Study staff record days of attempted use and reasons for missed days, when available.

  3. System Usability Scale (SUS)

    Time frame: All sessions of phase 1 (months 3-4) and final sessions of each participant in phase 4 (months 15-18)-- completed at session conclusion following STRIVE engagement.

    10-item assessment, each item rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Items are scored to yield a total score from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better perceived usability.

  4. Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST)

    Time frame: All sessions of phase 1 (months 3-4) and final sessions of each participant in phase 4 (months 15-18)-- administered at session conclusion following STRIVE engagement.

    Participants are asked to rate their satisfaction for STRIVE on a 5 point scale that ranges from "not satisfied" at all to "very satisfied." Quest has 12 items, with higher scores reflecting higher user satisfaction.

  5. STRIVE system logs

    Time frame: Throughout phase 1 (months 3-4) and phase 4 (months 15-18)

    STRIVE will automatically record data that includes session start/end time, duration, active play time, number of sessions completed, and performance metrics.

  6. Total time of Engagement for Strive

    Time frame: Every session during phase 1 (months 3-4) and phase 4 (months 15-18)

    STRIVE will automatically record data that includes session start/end time. Duration will be calculated via END_TIME-START_TIME.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rates and incidents

    Time frame: All sessions of each participant in phase 4 (months 15-18)

    Adverse events (recorded as note to files), safety events (recorded as note to files), staff support time required (recorded total minutes per staff per participant)

  2. Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI)- short form

    Time frame: All sessions of phase 1 (months 3-4) and final sessions of each participant in phase 4 (months 15-18)-- administered at session conclusion following STRIVE engagement.

    Descriptive assessment of interest/enjoyment and perceived competence. 8-14 items. Items are rated on a likert scale of 1-7, where the higher the score, with a 7 indicating the participant strongly agrees the item statement.

  3. Pittsburgh Rehabilitation Participation Scale (PRPS)

    Time frame: All sessions of phase 1 (months 3-4) and at least 2 sessions for each participant in phase 4 (months 15-18)-- administered at session conclusion following STRIVE engagement.

    Rated via observation of participant engaging in STRIVE during a typical session by a member of the study team. 6- point Likert-type scale, with a 0 indicating no participation, and 6 indicating excellent participation.

  4. Number of STRIVE Sessions Completed

    Time frame: Every session in phase 4 (months 15-18)

    Feasibility of the STRIVE intervention, measured as the number of STRIVE sessions each participant completed over the intervention period. A session is considered completed if the participant engaged with the STRIVE system for at least 30 minutes per day and the session is logged by the system. Sessions that were started but did not meet this threshold, and sessions missed for any reason, are counted as not completed. Each participant is assigned a single count, and the number of completed sessions is reported as a mean across participants. Higher values indicate greater intervention uptake.

  5. Participant-Rated Acceptability of the STRIVE System

    Time frame: All sessions of phase 1 (months 3-4) and final sessions of each participant in phase 4 (months 15-18)-- administered at session conclusion following STRIVE engagement.

    Acceptability of STRIVE rated by participants on a custom 10-item questionnaire administered verbally or on paper. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 to 5, and item scores are averaged to yield a single mean score ranging from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability. This is a non-validated instrument developed for this study.

  6. Semi-Structured Qualitative Interview

    Time frame: All sessions of phase 1 (months 3-4) and final sessions of each participant in phase 4 (months 15-18)-- administered at session conclusion following STRIVE engagement.

    Participants complete a semi-structured qualitative interview with open-ended prompts addressing acceptability, perceived benefit, barriers to independent use, and suggestions for improvement. Responses are transcribed and coded. The reported value is the count of distinct usability issues identified across participants, where an issue is defined as a discrete, non-redundant barrier to independent system use.

Other outcomes

  1. Participant movement smoothness

    Time frame: Every session in phase 1 (months 3-4) and phase 4 (months 15-18)

    Movement smoothness of the more affected upper limb during STRIVE gameplay, quantified as log dimensionless jerk from motion data from the STRIVE system. Values are computed per reaching repetition and averaged across all repetitions within a session. Lower (more negative) values indicate smoother movement. This measure is reported in unitless log dimensionless jerk.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Rachel A Kalvakota, OTD, OTR/L

CONTACT

[email protected]

3122383947

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Milap Sandhu

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Self-Directed Upper Extremity Gaming in Inpatients With Stroke: A Feasibility Study

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Sep 8, 2026
Registry last updated
Sep 8, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.