Department of Critical Care Medicine,Ruijin Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Shanghai,China.
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200025, China
NCT Number: NCT07804992
This retrospective target trial emulation evaluates the optimal timing of de-escalation from controlled to assisted mechanical ventilation in critically ill adults. Using the clone-censor-weight (CCW) estimator with stabilised inverse-probability-of-censoring weights, we compare two strategies over a 24-hour grace window following a 48-hour landmark: early de-escalation (step-down in ventilatory support mode or successful extubation) versus deferred de-escalation (support maintained or increased). The primary outcome is 28-day in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes are 28-day restricted mean survival time (RMST) and ventilator-free days (VFD28). The study uses MIMIC-IV v2.2 (derivation cohort, n=1,902 analysable) with external validation in eICU-CRD v2.0 (validation cohort, n=10,957 analysable). All analyses employ stabilised IPCW with bootstrap confidence intervals, including six sensitivity and robustness analyses (extended covariate adjustment, alternative weight truncation, doubly robust AIPW estimator) and an exploratory FiO₂×PEEP threshold grid.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200025, China
Background: Mechanical ventilation is life-saving, yet optimal timing of transition from controlled to assisted modes remains uncertain. Prolonged controlled ventilation exposes patients to sedation, diaphragm dysfunction, and lung injury, while premature de-escalation risks asynchrony and reintubation.
Design: Landmark target trial emulation with 48-hour eligibility ascertainment.
Eligibility: Adults ≥18 years, invasive mechanical ventilation >24 hours, alive and ventilated at 48 hours with classifiable Day-2 mode (controlled or assisted), Day-2 FiO₂ ≤50%, Day-2 PEEP ≤10 cmH₂O.
Strategies: Early-support level decreased by Day 3 (mode step-down from controlled to assisted, or successful extubation while alive); Deferred-support maintained or increased.
Analysis: Single-interval CCW estimator with stabilised IPCW (truncated 1st-99th percentile), propensity model with 21 baseline covariates, bootstrap 95% CIs (2,000 resamples primary; 800 sensitivity). Sensitivity analyses: no truncation, ICU mortality, unweighted per-protocol, extended 40-covariate adjustment, 5th-95th truncation, AIPW doubly robust estimator. E-values computed for unmeasured confounding.
External validation: Harmonised protocol in eICU-CRD v2.0 (208 hospitals, n=10,957), outcome: in-hospital mortality.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The study compares two respiratory support management strategies over a 24-hour grace window (Day 2 to Day 3 of ICU admission) following the 48-hour landmark. Early De-escalation: Ventilatory support level is decreased, defined as a transition from a controlled mode to an assisted/spontaneous mode, or successful extubation (end of mechanical ventilation) while the patient is alive by Day 3. Deferred De-escalation: Ventilatory support level is maintained or increased between Day 2 and Day 3.
Time frame: within 28 days of ICU admission
Death in hospital within 28 days of ICU admission
Time frame: within 28 days of ICU admission
Mean survival time up to 28 days
Time frame: within 28 days of ICU admission
Number of days alive and free of mechanical ventilation within the first 28 days; set to zero for patients who died before day 28
Ruijin Hospital
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07807189
Advanced Respiratory Support, Critical Illness
Mount Kisco, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07658131
Critical Illness, Disease Attributes
Taichung, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT07380607
Critical Illness, Disease Attributes
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07313956
Critical Illness, Disease Attributes
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial Details