Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07804758

Ultra-Micronized vs Liposomal PEA 600 mg: A Crossover PK Study in Healthy Subjects

This is a crossover pharmacokinetic study comparing two oral formulations of palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) as a dietary supplement: ultra-micronized PEA 600 mg (Normast 600) and liposomal PEA 600 mg (AliaMed), in 6 healthy subjects following a single oral dose.

Eligible subjects presenting at the Crabion S.r.l. research center for routine screening, who meet the inclusion criteria and provide informed consent, will be enrolled and allocated to one of two groups using non-random, systematic alternate allocation.

On Day 1, after a fasting baseline blood draw (T0), Group 1 subjects will receive a single 600 mg dose of ultra-micronized PEA (Normast 600), while Group 2 subjects will receive a single 600 mg dose of liposomal PEA (AliaMed). Subjects may eat breakfast immediately after dosing. Blood samples (~3 mL each) will be collected at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 24 hours post-dose. Subjects will remain at the center for approximately 4 hours (through the penultimate draw) and will return the following morning for the final 24-hour sample. Subjects will be monitored throughout their stay and asked to report any adverse effects.

A 7-day washout period will follow. On Day 2 (post-washout), subjects will cross over to the alternate formulation: Group 1 will receive liposomal PEA and Group 2 will receive ultra-micronized PEA, each as a single 600 mg dose. Blood samples will be collected at the same time points as Day 1 (0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 24 hours) and analyzed per the same parameters.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Crabion S.R.L.

Corciano, PG, 06073, Italy

About this study

**Detailed Description**

Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) is an endogenous lipid mediator belonging to the N-acylethanolamine family, extensively studied for its analgesic, immunomodulatory, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory properties. It is currently used as a nutraceutical for its antinociceptive, neuroprotective, and immunomodulatory effects, particularly in supporting brain and joint health and in mitigating inflammatory processes. Despite this significant potential, the clinical utility of PEA is limited by its poor water solubility, extensive gastrointestinal metabolism, and consequently low oral bioavailability. Over the years, several technological strategies have been explored to improve the pharmacokinetic profile of PEA, including particle-size reduction techniques such as micronization and ultra-micronization, as well as the use of lipid-based carriers such as liposomal delivery systems.

This single-center, open-label, randomized (systematic alternate allocation), two-treatment, two-period, single-dose crossover study is designed to compare the oral absorption of a single 600 mg dose of PEA administered in two different technological formulations: an ultra-micronized formulation (Normast 600, tablet) and a liposomal formulation (AliaMed, sachet), in order to evaluate the impact of formulation technology on the nutraceutical utilization of the molecule.

A total of 6 healthy adult subjects will be enrolled at the Crabion S.r.l. research center (Corciano, Perugia, Italy) among individuals presenting for routine laboratory testing who meet the eligibility criteria and provide written informed consent.

Participants will be allocated to one of two sequence groups using non-random, systematic alternate allocation: Group 1 (n=3) will receive Treatment A (ultra-micronized PEA, Normast 600) in Period 1 followed, after washout, by Treatment B (liposomal PEA, AliaMed) in Period 2; Group 2 (n=3) will receive Treatment B in Period 1 followed by Treatment A in Period 2. On Day 1 of each period, after a fasting baseline blood draw (T0), subjects will take a single oral 600 mg dose of PEA according to group assignment; breakfast will be permitted immediately after dosing. Venous blood samples (~3 mL per draw) will be collected at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 24 hours post-dose. Subjects will remain at the research center for approximately 4 hours (through the 4-hour draw) and will return the following morning for the 24-hour sample. A 7-day washout period separates the two treatment periods, after which the crossover occurs and the alternate formulation is administered following the same sampling schedule.

At each visit, clinical examination and blood collection are performed for: complete blood count (T0 and 24h only), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) (all time points), plasma PEA quantification (all time points), and plasma 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) quantification (all time points). Blood is collected using a 22G two-way cannula needle into NaEDTA-anticoagulated tubes (hematology, PEA, 2-AG, ESR) and into dry tubes with separator gel (CRP). PEA and 2-AG are quantified by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) following protein precipitation, extraction, and purification with appropriate organic solvents; absolute quantification is based on a multi-level calibration curve prepared in matrix, with linearity, accuracy, and precision verified according to international bioanalytical guidelines.

Sample size was calculated using G*Power 3.1.9.7 based on the primary endpoint (AUC₁ ≠ AUC₂), using a paired-samples t-test consistent with the crossover design, an effect size of 1.327 derived from AUC data of a reference pharmacokinetic comparison study of two PEA formulations, a type I error probability (α) of 0.05, and a statistical power (1-β) of 80%, yielding a total sample size of 6 subjects.

The overall study duration is 24 days, comprising: subject enrollment (1 day); the study phase itself, including both treatment periods and washout (9 days); execution of chemical/biochemical analyses at the CRABION S.r.l. laboratory (7 days); and statistical analysis and data processing (7 days). Blood samples will not be retained beyond the end of the study, as they will be fully utilized for study-related analyses.

The study will be conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines, and applicable clinical research regulations. The main procedural risk is associated with venipuncture and may occasionally include mild discomfort or transient pain, minor hematoma at the puncture site, vasovagal reaction (spontaneously and rapidly resolving), or, in very rare cases, local inflammation or infection. These risks are considered minimal and proportionate to the scientific objective of the study; appropriate monitoring is in place to ensure immediate intervention if such events occur.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18-70 years
  • BMI 18-30 kg/m²
  • Healthy participants
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Use of PEA-based supplements in the preceding 2 weeks.
  • Significant liver, kidney, gastrointestinal or metabolic conditions.
  • Known allergy or intolerance to PEA or excipients.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding

Treatment and study plan

ultra-micronised PEA

Dietary Supplement

Participants received ultra-micronised PEA followed by liposomal PEA after the washout period.

liposomal PEA

Dietary Supplement

Participants received liposomal PEA followed by ultra-micronized PEA after the washout period.

Primary outcomes

  1. Comparison of the AUC after single dose between Liposomal PEA and ultra-micronised PEA

    Time frame: From the enrollment to the end of the study at 9 days

    The primary objective of the study is to compare systemic exposure to palmitoylethanolamide (PEA), expressed as the area under the curve (AUC), following a single dose of the two PEA formulations under evaluation:

    • Liposomal PEA
    • Ultra-micronised PEA

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of half-life (t1/2)

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the study at 9 days

    Evaluation of half-life of both PEA formulations

  2. Evaluation of Cmax

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the study at 9 days

    Evaluation of the difference in maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) between the two PEA formulations.

  3. Evaluation of Tmax

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the study at 9 days

    Evaluation of the difference in time to reach maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) between the two PEA formulations.

  4. Evaluation of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the study at 9 days

    Assessment of the safety and tolerability of the two PEA formulations by monitoring changes in erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) levels

  5. Evaluation of C-reactive protein (CRP)

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the study at 9 days

    Assessment of the safety and tolerability of the two PEA formulations by monitoring changes in C-reactive protein (CRP) levels

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

S&R Farmaceutici S.p.A.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Comparative Crossover Pharmacokinetic Study of a Dietary Supplement: 600 mg of Ultra-micronized Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) (Normast 600) Versus 600 mg of PEA in a Liposomal Formulation (AliaMed) in Healthy Subjects Following a Single Oral Dose.

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Sep 4, 2026
Registry last updated
Sep 4, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.