Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not yet recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07804511

Adapted Physical Activity for Persistent Fatigue in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Remission

The cAPAble study aims to evaluate the impact of an adapted physical activity program on persistent fatigue in patients with inflammatory bowel disease in remission. This multicenter randomized study will include 120 participants. Participants will be randomly assigned to either a 6-month adapted physical activity program or usual care. Fatigue will be assessed using the FACIT-F questionnaire at 6 months.

Not yet recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

About this study

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), including Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, are chronic conditions that can affect patients' daily lives even when the disease is in remission. Persistent fatigue is a common and disabling symptom that may remain despite control of intestinal inflammation.

The cAPAble study will evaluate whether an adapted physical activity (APA) program can help reduce persistent fatigue in patients with IBD in remission. This is a multicenter randomized interventional study. Participants will be randomly assigned to an adapted physical activity program or usual care.

The APA program is designed to be adapted to each participant's physical abilities and needs and will be delivered over 6 months. The program aims to progressively increase physical activity and support participants in maintaining regular physical activity in their daily lives.

The main purpose of the study is to determine whether participation in the APA program improves persistent fatigue. The study will also explore potential effects on physical activity, quality of life, psychological well-being and other aspects of participants' health and daily functioning.

Participants will be followed throughout the study according to the protocol, with assessments performed at predefined time points using validated questionnaires and other study assessments. The results of the study may help improve the management of persistent fatigue in people with IBD in remission and contribute to the development of supportive non-drug approaches for these patients.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in clinical and biological remission (CRP/fecal calprotectin) for more than 6 months:
  • Remission according to PRO2 (Patient-Reported Outcome): liquid stool frequency ≤2/day and abdominal pain score ≤1 for Crohn's disease; stool frequency score ≤1 and rectal bleeding score = 0 for ulcerative colitis.
  • CRP <5 mg/L.
  • Fecal calprotectin <250 µg/g.
  • Patients with significant fatigue (FACIT-F score ≤40) persisting for at least 3 months before inclusion, confirmed by two successive FACIT-F questionnaire assessments: the first at the screening visit (M-3), after obtaining informed consent, serving as the baseline value, and the second at the inclusion visit (M0), confirming persistence of fatigue for at least 3 months.
  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • Medical certificate confirming fitness to participate in physical activity. If the participant does not have a recent certificate dated within the previous 3 months, a specific consultation with the treating physician will be required. This consultation will be covered by the sponsor.

Exclusion criteria

  • Another identified cause of fatigue based on the first-line assessment performed in this context (complete blood count, liver function tests, CRP, blood electrolyte panel, serum creatinine, iron studies, folate, vitamin B12, TSH, fasting blood glucose).
  • Unstable cardiovascular or respiratory disease.
  • Patients already meeting the WHO physical activity recommendations before inclusion (IPAQ score ≥1500).
  • Current pregnancy or pregnancy planned during the study period.
  • Inability, for technical or other reasons, to connect to the Internet for telemonitoring and/or telerehabilitation.
  • Planned surgery requiring hospitalization.
  • Refusal to participate.
  • Persons under legal guardianship or deprived of liberty.
  • Uncontrolled diagnosed psychiatric disorder.
  • Participant currently in an exclusion period for another clinical study.
  • Participant who cannot be contacted in case of an emergency.
  • Any surgery planned during the first 6 months of the study that requires hospitalization.

Treatment and study plan

Adapted Physical Activity

Behavioral

A 6-month adapted physical activity program tailored to each participant's physical abilities and individual needs. The program consists of 12 one-hour sessions delivered every two weeks, followed by 2 months of telephone follow-up to support participants in maintaining regular physical activity.

Usual Care

Other

Participants will receive usual care according to standard clinical practice.

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean FACIT-F score at 6 months

    Time frame: at 6 months

    Mean FACIT-F (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue) score in each study arm at 6 months.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Fatigue assessed by the FACIT-Fatigue (FACIT-F) score at 3 and 12 months

    Time frame: At 3 months and 12 months

    The FACIT-Fatigue subscale is a 13-item self-administered questionnaire. The total score ranges from 0 to 52; a higher score indicates less fatigue (better outcome). Mean scores are compared between the adapted physical activity arm and the standard care arm.

  2. Quality of life assessed by the IBD-Disk

    Time frame: At 3 months, 6 months and 12 months

    The IBD-Disk is a 10-item self-administered instrument; each item is rated on a 0 to 10 numerical scale, giving a total score from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates greater disability and poorer quality of life. Mean scores are compared between the adapted physical activity arm and the standard care arm.

  3. Physical condition assessed by Body weight

    Time frame: At 6 months and 12 months

    Body weight (kg) - mean values are compared between the adapted physical activity arm and the standard care arm.

  4. Physical condition assessed by body mass index

    Time frame: At 6 months and 12 months

    Body mass index (kg/m²) - Mean values are compared between the adapted physical activity arm and the standard care arm.

  5. Physical condition assessed by waist circumference

    Time frame: At 6 months and 12 months

    Waist circumference (cm) - Mean values are compared between the adapted physical activity arm and the standard care arm.

  6. Physical condition assessed by handgrip strength

    Time frame: At 6 months and 12 months

    Handgrip strength measured by dynamometer (kg) - Mean values are compared between the adapted physical activity arm and the standard care arm.

  7. Health care resource use

    Time frame: At 6 months and 12 months

    Number of participants with at least one of the following events, collected using a study-specific health care use questionnaire: hospitalisation, corticosteroid course, change in inflammatory bowel disease therapy, consultation with a general practitioner, consultation with a psychologist, and use of complementary or alternative medicine. Compared between the adapted physical activity arm and the standard care arm.

  8. Health care resource use

    Time frame: At 6 months and 12 months

    Proportion of participants with at least one of the following events, collected using a study-specific health care use questionnaire: hospitalisation, corticosteroid course, change in inflammatory bowel disease therapy, consultation with a general practitioner, consultation with a psychologist, and use of complementary or alternative medicine. Compared between the adapted physical activity arm and the standard care arm.

  9. State anxiety assessed by the STAI-State

    Time frame: At 6 months and 12 months

    State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, State subscale (STAI-State): 20 items, total score from 20 to 80; a higher score indicates greater state anxiety. Mean scores are compared between the adapted physical activity arm and the standard care arm.

  10. Depressive symptoms assessed by the PHQ-9

    Time frame: At 6 months and 12 months

    Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9): 9 items, total score from 0 to 27; a higher score indicates more severe depressive symptoms. Mean scores are compared between the adapted physical activity arm and the standard care arm.

  11. Clinical disease activity assessed by the PRO2

    Time frame: At 3 months, 6 months and 12 months

    Patient-reported outcome 2 (PRO2): a higher value indicates greater disease activity. Mean values are compared between the adapted physical activity arm and the standard care arm.

  12. Biological disease activity assessed by C-reactive protein (mg/L)

    Time frame: At 3 months, 6 months and 12 months

    C-reactive protein (mg/L) - a higher value indicates greater disease activity. Mean values are compared between the adapted physical activity arm and the standard care arm.

  13. Biological disease activity assessed by Faecal calprotectin (µg/g)

    Time frame: At 3 months, 6 months and 12 months

    Faecal calprotectin (µg/g) - a higher value indicates greater disease activity. Mean values are compared between the adapted physical activity arm and the standard care arm.

  14. Physical activity level assessed by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)

    Time frame: At 3 months, 6 months and 12

    The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) is a self-administered questionnaire; physical activity is expressed in MET-minutes per week. A higher value indicates a higher level of physical activity. Mean values are compared between the adapted physical activity arm and the standard care arm.

  15. Functional capacity assessed by the 6-minute walk test

    Time frame: At 6 months and 12 months

    Maximal distance walked during the 6-minute walk test, expressed in metres. A greater distance indicates better functional capacity. Mean values are compared between the adapted physical activity arm and the standard care arm.

  16. Correlation between a fatigue visual analogue scale and the FACIT-Fatigue score

    Time frame: At 3 months, 6 months and 12 months

    Correlation coefficient between the fatigue visual analogue scale (VAS-F, scored from 0 to 10, a higher score indicating more fatigue) and the FACIT-Fatigue score (scored from 0 to 52, a higher score indicating less fatigue), at each assessment time point. This outcome measure is assessed in the whole study population and is not a between-arm comparison.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Clémence LOMBOIS, Dr

CONTACT

[email protected]

04767673749

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Grenoble

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Impact of Adapted Physical Activity on Persistent Fatigue in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Remission

Acronym: cAPAble

Important dates

Study start
2027
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2030
First posted
Sep 4, 2026
Registry last updated
Sep 4, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.