Benha University Hospital
Banhā, Qalyubia Governorate, 6460001, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT07803614
This study compares two different ways of providing mechanical ventilation to patients with moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), a serious condition in which the lungs become inflamed and make it difficult to breathe and maintain normal oxygen levels. Patients are randomly assigned to receive either airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) or conventional low-tidal-volume ventilation (LTV). The study compares the two ventilation strategies in terms of successful removal from the ventilator, time needed on mechanical ventilation, improvement in blood oxygen levels, length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital, and complications such as the need for reintubation, barotrauma, and death. The aim is to determine whether APRV provides better outcomes than conventional low-tidal-volume ventilation in patients with moderate to severe ARDS.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Banhā, Qalyubia Governorate, 6460001, Egypt
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a severe form of acute respiratory failure characterized by impaired oxygenation and bilateral pulmonary abnormalities. Mechanical ventilation is a cornerstone of supportive treatment for patients with moderate to severe ARDS.
This prospective randomized controlled study compares airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) with conventional low-tidal-volume ventilation (LTV) in patients with moderate to severe ARDS. Eligible patients are randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either APRV or LTV according to a predefined ventilation protocol.
In the LTV group, ventilation is provided using a lung-protective strategy with tidal volumes targeted according to predicted body weight and limitation of plateau pressure. In the APRV group, ventilation is delivered using two airway pressure levels with prolonged high-pressure periods and brief release periods. APRV settings are individualized according to oxygenation, ventilation, respiratory mechanics, clinical response, and hemodynamic tolerance. Release tidal volume, minute ventilation, and respiratory-system compliance are monitored during APRV.
Patients in both groups undergo daily assessment for readiness for ventilator weaning. Once predefined weaning criteria are met, patients undergo a standardized spontaneous breathing trial using the same procedure in both groups. Patients who successfully complete the trial are assessed for extubation according to predefined clinical criteria.
The primary outcome is successful extubation, defined as liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation without the need for reintubation within 72 hours after extubation. Secondary outcomes include time to successful extubation, duration of mechanical ventilation, change in the PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio during the first 7 days, ICU length of stay, and hospital length of stay. Safety outcomes include all-cause mortality and barotrauma.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
For LTV
Participants received conventional low-tidal-volume mechanical ventilation using a tidal volume of 4-8 mL/kg predicted body weight, with plateau pressure maintained below 30 cmH₂O. Ventilator settings were adjusted according to oxygenation, ventilation, respiratory mechanics, and hemodynamic status. FiO₂ and PEEP were adjusted to maintain the predefined oxygenation target. Patients underwent the standardized weaning and spontaneous breathing trial protocol used in both study groups.
For APRV
Participants received airway pressure release ventilation using two airway pressure levels (P-high and P-low), prolonged T-high, and brief T-low periods. P-high was initially set at 20-30 cmH₂O and P-low at 5 cmH₂O. T-high was initially set at 4-6 seconds and T-low at 0.6 seconds, with T-low subsequently adjusted according to the expiratory-flow waveform to limit excessive expiratory lung emptying and maintain end-expiratory lung volume. FiO₂ was adjusted to maintain SpO₂ at 88-95%. Rele
Time frame: From randomization until 72 hours after extubation
Liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation without the need for reintubation within 72 hours after extubation.
Time frame: From randomization until successful extubation, hospital discharge, or death, whichever occurred first; assessed up to 30 days.
Time from randomization to successful extubation among patients who achieved successful extubation, defined as liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation followed by at least 72 hours without reintubation.
Time frame: At baseline and 1, 3, and 7 days after initiation of the assigned ventilatory strategy.
Change in the PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio from baseline to 1, 3, and 7 days after initiation of the assigned ventilatory strategy (LTV or APRV).
Time frame: From ICU admission until ICU discharge or death, whichever occurred first, assessed up to 30 days.
Duration of stay in the intensive care unit, calculated from ICU admission until ICU discharge or death, whichever occurred first.
Time frame: From hospital admission until hospital discharge or death, whichever occurred first, assessed up to 30 days.
Total duration of hospitalization, calculated from hospital admission until hospital discharge or death, whichever occurred first.
Koot Ahmad
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06701682
ARDS, ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06701669
ARDS, ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06703073
ARDS, ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06701656
ARDS, ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details