Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not yet recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07801079

Ecological Momentary Assessment of State-Dependent Decision-Making and Metacognition Across a Psychopathology Continuum

Background:

Life experiences could impact how one feel, and in turn alter how decisions are made. For example, an argument with a loved one might lead to frustration that drives one to seek alcohol or engage in other riskier decision-making. By tracking not only how life experiences might change feelings but also the decision-making tendencies assessed by behavioral tasks, researcher aimed to better understand naturalistically how life experiences might shape behaviors through feelings. This could lead to a better understanding, identification and treatment for people with mental disorders.

Objective:

Naturalistically track how life experiences change self-reported mental states, such as emotions or mood, as well as decision-making tendencies.

Eligibility:

Individuals aged 18 to 55 years, who are either healthy or with varying degrees of depressive, anxious or addictive symptom severity.

Design:

Participants in the study will complete the following activities: 1) complete an initial assessment of their medical, mental health and personal history; 2) complete a set of behavior tasks; 3) for 12 weeks, complete surveys, tasks and audiovisual diary on a smart phone while they go about their life; 4) for 12 weeks, continuously wear an smartwatch-like device to track physiological signals; 5) every 2 weeks for 12 weeks, complete a set of surveys on mental health conditions; and 6) complete an end-of-study debriefing session to discuss their experience in the study.

Not yet recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year–55 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

National Institutes of Health Clinical Center

Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States

Location contact

NIH Clinical Center Office of Patient Recruitment (OPR)

CONTACT

[email protected]

800-411-1222 ext. TTY dial 711

About this study

Study Description:

This observational study employs an Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) methodology to investigate how naturalistic changes in internal states (ranging from emotional to physiological and interoceptive states) lead to changes in value-based decision-making. The study will include a "dimensional cohort" of participants that range from healthy to subclinical to clinical levels of psychopathology, with a focus on substance use, depression, and anxiety. Using a mobile application, participants will remotely respond to multiple daily prompts for a total participation time of 12 weeks. In addition to this, the study will incorporate multimodal biosensor recording collected from wearable technology to capture passive physiological metrics. It aims to understand the dynamics of decision making, metacognition, and how their variability may be causally related to changes in emotional internal states, captured in real-world settings.

Objectives:

Primary Objective:

To measure the influence of naturally occurring fluctuations in emotional internal states on value-based decision-making.

Secondary Objectives:

  • To estimate the temporal profile of internal state; the lag between changes in internal state and measurable changes in decision-making and if different aspects of decision-makings might be sensitive to whether a change in internal state is acute or sustained (state dynamic).
  • To identify how individual differences in metacognition might moderate the influence of internal states on decision-making.
  • To establish the relationship between psychiatric symptom severity and the reactivity of decision-making to changes in internal state.

Endpoints:

Primary Endpoint:

Through EMA, repeated measures of self-reported internal states, significant life events, and behaviors in established and novel cognitive-behavioral decision-making tasks.

Secondary Endpoints:

  • Time of recording of ratings, responses, and completed tasks; repeated measures of self-reported internal states at different temporal scales (hours, days or weeks); repeated measures on internal states followed by reporting of significant life events (Microbursts); and repeated reports on the time of occurrence, description, and characteristics of significant life events.
  • Measures of metacognition derived from questionnaires and confidence ratings in decision-making tasks, such as confidence bias and confidence sensitivity.
  • Transdiagnostic dimensional measures of individual-level and state-level symptom severity, collected throughout the study; clinical diagnosis on psychopathology as determined by Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders (SCID).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

  • INCLUSION CRITERIA

In order to be eligible to participate in this study, an individual must meet all of the following criteria:

  • Understands study procedures as well as the risks and benefits associated with them. Is willing to comply with study procedures and is available for the duration of the study.
  • Currently resides in the United States.
  • Aged 18-55.
  • Individuals in good general health as evidenced by medical and psychiatric history, or individuals who endorsed current or lifetime clinical or subclinical symptoms related to Depressive Disorders, Anxiety Disorders, Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders.
  • Agreement to adhere to Lifestyle Considerations throughout study duration.

Exclusion criteria

An individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation:

  • Any unstable medical conditions (not well-controlled or are subject to frequent exacerbations, including uncontrolled hypertension, recent myocardial infarction, or unstable diabetes), severe chronic (long-term medical conditions that are either progressive or require ongoing medical treatment, including advanced cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or end-stage renal disease), or significantly impairing medical condition that could limit cognitive, mobility, and physiological measures (conditions that severely limit mobility or daily functioning, such as severe arthritis, advanced Parkinson's disease, or major neurocognitive disorders).
  • Any Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), loss of consciousness, brain lesion, epileptic seizure, or any other conditions that are indicative of abnormal function or structure of the brain.
  • Self-reported acute intoxication, withdrawal, or another medically compromised condition at Enrollment / Baseline Visit.
  • Following psychiatric symptoms and disorder diagnosis:
  • Any current serious ideation, intention or plan for homicide or intentional harm towards others as determined by SCID-V and the clinical judgement of qualified clinical team member.
  • Imminent / High risk of self-harm or suicide as determined by SCID-V and the clinical judgement of qualified clinical team member.
  • Current manic episode as determined by SCID-V and self-report questionnaires.
  • Currently under inpatient care.
  • Diagnosis (current and lifetime) and / or treatment for the following psychiatric disorders as defined in the DSM-5:
  • Any symptoms compatible with Psychosis
  • Neurodevelopmental Disorders (e.g. with learning or intellectual disability) impacting understanding of Decision-Making Tasks
  • Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders
  • Dissociative Disorders
  • Sleep-Wake Disorders, except for Breathing-Related Sleep Disorders
  • Neurocognitive Disorders (e.g., dementia or cognitive decline) impacting understanding of Decision-Making Tasks
  • Any significantly impairing psychiatric disorder, symptom or behavior, as determined by comprehensive clinical assessments, including severity scales, clinician judgment, and self-report measures.
  • Self-reported pregnancy or lactation.
  • Any disrespectful or unprofessional behavior towards any study team member.
  • Familial or any close personal relationship with a study team member.
  • Any condition or general impairment that might interfere with or limit individual's ability to engage in informed consent and study procedures.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. To establish the relationship between psychiatric symptom severity and the reactivity of decision-making to changes in internal state.

    Time frame: Throughout the study, transdiagnostic measures of trait- and state-level symptom severity and clinical diagnosis determined by Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders (SCID).

    Dimensional approach allows for examination of the moderation effect of symptom-level severity across psychiatric diagnosis. The state-level symptom severity can also be used to infer the state dynamic.However, clinical diagnosis still serves an important role in understanding how decision making and internal state dynamics might be different for patients with psychopathology. Further, collecting clinical diagnosis can better connect knowledge gained from this protocol to existing literature.

  2. To identify how individual differences in metacognition might moderate the influence of internal states on decision-making.

    Time frame: In 12 weeks of EMA, measure of metacognition derived from questionnaires and confidence ratings in decision-making tasks.

    Confidence is a standard proxy measure of metacognitive ability.

  3. To estimate the temporal profile of internal state; the lag between changes in internal state and measurable changes in decision-making and to assess whether different aspects of decision-makings are sensitive to acute versus sustained changes i...

    Time frame: In 12 weeks of EMA, self-report of internal states in different time scale and following significant life event.

    Time difference between a measurable change in decision-making characteristics and the most recent change in internal state can be calculated. State dynamics (acute versus sustained changes in internal state) can be identified by analyzing internal state fluctuation measures collected at different time scales and temporal proximity to significant life events.Life events of different types or characteristics might be more likely to elicit acute versus sustained changes and vice versa.

  4. To assess the influence of naturally occurring fluctuations in internal states on value-based decision-making.

    Time frame: In 12 weeks of EMA, self-report of internal states and significant life events as well as behaviors in established and novel cognitive-behavioral decision-making tasks.

    EMA allows for measures of changes in naturalistic settings. Collecting self-reported internal states and significant life events can establish an internal state timeline for modeling naturally occurring fluctuations in internal states.Cognitive-behavioral decision-making tasks are informative of value-based decision-making processes.Behaviors in these tasks can also be used for computational modeling of the (sub)processes and mechanisms of value-based decision-making, such as risk tolerance, ambiguity tolerance, impulsive choice, approach/avoidance behavior, planning, learning, goal progress, pleasure related to goal progress, and decision confidence.

Secondary outcomes

  1. To inform key elements of a just-in-time adaptive intervention (JITAI)

    Time frame: Possible decision points jointly estimated with self-reported internal state, model predicted internal states, decision-making behavior, and symptom severity.

    EMA data and analysis will aid in identifying some of the key elements for a future JITAI study aimed at reducing emotional reactivity.

  2. To predict the presence of emotional state changes using multimodal feature data

    Time frame: Throughout the study, physiological signals collected from biosensors, speech and facial features from audiovisual recording, and lexical and semantical features derived from free responses.

    Physiological signals such as heart rate and electrodermal activity is linked to dimensions of internal state, such as arousal. Speech and facial features are used to infer internal states such as emotions (voice intonation and facial expression).Language use features, lexicon and semantic content, are sensitive to internal states.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Silvia Lopez Guzman, M.D.

CONTACT

[email protected]

(301) 451-7822

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Nih

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2031
Study completion
2032
First posted
Sep 3, 2026
Registry last updated
Sep 3, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.