Cesme Alper Cizgenakat State Hospital
Izmir, 35950, Turkey (Türkiye)
Location contact
Ali Kerim Yılmaz, Dr.
CONTACT
Cihangir Türemiş, Dr.
CONTACT
Cihangir Türemiş, Dr.
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT07800780
The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the effects of two different collagen supplement formulations on pain, physical function, and overall quality of life in adults with knee osteoarthritis.
Knee osteoarthritis is a common joint disease characterized by cartilage degeneration, which leads to chronic pain and reduced mobility. While collagen supplements are frequently used to support joint health, their clinical effectiveness is usually measured using traditional pain scales. However, osteoarthritis pain is complex and multidimensional, often involving different patterns (such as constant or intermittent pain) and central neurological sensitization. This study aims to use a holistic approach to understand how collagen supplements affect these complex pain experiences using comprehensive patient-reported outcome measures.
Participants in this study will be adults between the ages of 35 and 65 who have been diagnosed with unilateral knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 or 3).
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups:
Hydrolyzed Collagen Group: Participants will consume a daily sachet containing 10 grams of enzymatically hydrolyzed bovine collagen peptide.
Bioactive Collagen Peptide Group: Participants will consume a daily sachet containing 5 grams of lower molecular weight bovine collagen peptide mixed with 5 grams of maltodextrin.
Placebo Group: Participants will consume a daily sachet containing 10 grams of maltodextrin (with no active collagen or protein), matching the active supplements in taste, smell, and appearance.
All participants will take their assigned supplement once daily for 8 weeks. To ensure unbiased results, the study is double-blind, meaning neither the participants nor the research staff evaluating the outcomes will know which group a participant is in.
Researchers will assess the participants at the beginning of the study (baseline) and at the end of the 8-week intervention. Assessments will be conducted using various established questionnaires to measure joint stiffness, physical limitations, general quality of life, and specific pain patterns, including central sensitization.
The study will be conducted at the Orthopedics and Traumatology Clinic of Cesme Alper Cizgenakat State Hospital in Türkiye. By looking beyond traditional clinical scales, this research aims to provide a deeper understanding of how different collagen formulations can improve the daily lives and complex pain symptoms of patients living with knee osteoarthritis.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified35 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Izmir, 35950, Turkey (Türkiye)
Ali Kerim Yılmaz, Dr.
CONTACT
Cihangir Türemiş, Dr.
CONTACT
Cihangir Türemiş, Dr.
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Background and Rationale Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent joint disorder characterized by progressive cartilage degeneration, chronic pain, and loss of function. While conservative management often includes dietary supplements such as hydrolyzed collagen and bioactive collagen peptides to support joint biology, clinical evaluations of these supplements are typically limited to traditional, unidimensional pain and function scales. Recent literature, however, emphasizes that OA pain is highly complex, involving peripheral nociceptive mechanisms, constant and intermittent pain patterns, and central neurological sensitization. Addressing a significant methodological gap in the literature, this study extends beyond standard scales by incorporating comprehensive Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) to capture the holistic pain experience, including central sensitization, in patients with knee OA.
Study Procedures and Blinding This is a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial. Following the baseline clinical and radiographic evaluation (Kellgren-Lawrence grading performed by an experienced orthopedic surgeon), eligible participants will be randomly allocated to one of three intervention arms using computer-assisted block randomization.
To ensure strict quadruple blinding (participant, care provider, investigator, and outcomes assessor), allocation concealment will be achieved using independently coded, opaque packaging. The active interventions (two different collagen formulations) and the placebo (maltodextrin-based) will be formulated to be entirely identical in appearance, color, smell, taste, and volume.
Intervention Administration and Monitoring Participants will be instructed to consume their assigned single-use sachet once daily between 13:00 and 15:00 for the entire 8-week intervention period. Patients will be advised to maintain their habitual physical activity levels throughout the study. Rescue analgesics are permitted if necessary for severe pain; however, the use of these medications must be strictly suspended at least 48 hours prior to any clinical evaluation session to avoid masking the outcomes. Adherence to the supplement regimen, rescue medication usage, and any potential adverse events will be continuously monitored via daily follow-up cards filled out by the participants. A minimum adherence rate of 95% is mandatory; participants failing to meet this threshold will be excluded from the final analysis.
Sample Size and Statistical Analysis Plan An a priori power analysis was conducted using G*Power software to determine the required sample size. Based on a Mixed-Design ANOVA model (group × time interaction) aiming for a moderate effect size (Cohen's f = 0.25), an alpha level of 0.05, and 80% statistical power, a minimum of 42 participants was required. To account for potential dropouts, a total of 45 patients (15 per group) will be enrolled.
Statistical analyses will be executed using R software under a Per-Protocol (PP) framework. Data normality will be assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. A Mixed-Design ANOVA will be employed to evaluate the main effects and the group-by-time interactions. Significant interactions will be further analyzed with post-hoc pairwise comparisons utilizing the Bonferroni correction. Effect sizes will be reported using Cohen's d for pairwise comparisons and partial eta squared (reported as η²p) for variance analyses, along with corresponding lower and upper bounds (LB/UB). Statistical significance is set at p < 0.05.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A single-use sachet containing 10 grams of enzymatically hydrolyzed bovine collagen peptide. To be dissolved in water and taken orally once daily for 8 weeks.
A single-use sachet containing 5 grams of lower molecular weight bovine collagen peptide mixed with 5 grams of maltodextrin. To be dissolved in water and taken orally once daily for 8 weeks.
A single-use sachet containing 10 grams of maltodextrin with no active ingredients, completely matching the active supplements in appearance, color, smell, and taste. To be taken orally once daily for 8 weeks.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and End of Intervention (Week 8)
The WOMAC is a self-administered questionnaire used to evaluate pain, stiffness, and physical function in patients with knee osteoarthritis. It consists of 24 items divided into three subscales: Pain (5 items), Stiffness (2 items), and Physical Function (17 items). The total score ranges from 0 to 96. Higher scores indicate worse symptom severity, greater pain, and more physical disability. A decrease in the score indicates an improvement in the patient's condition.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and End of Intervention (Week 8)
Pain intensity will be measured using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The scale is anchored by "no pain" (score of 0) and "worst imaginable pain" (score of 10). Higher scores indicate greater pain severity. A decrease in the score indicates pain relief.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and End of Intervention (Week 8)
The CSI is a validated screening instrument used to identify and quantify symptoms related to central sensitization. It consists of 25 items scored on a 5-point Likert scale, with a total score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate a higher degree of central sensitization symptom severity. A decrease in the score indicates an improvement.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and End of Intervention (Week 8)
The ICOAP is an 11-item questionnaire designed to comprehensively evaluate both constant and intermittent pain experiences in osteoarthritis. It provides a constant pain subscale, an intermittent pain subscale, and a total pain score. Scores are normalized to range from 0 to 100. Higher scores represent more severe constant and intermittent pain. A decrease in the score indicates symptomatic improvement.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Ali Kerim Yılmaz, Dr.
CONTACT
Cihangir Türemiş, Dr
CONTACT
Cihangir Türemiş
Other Gov
Comparison of the Effects of Different Collagen Formulations on Pain, Function, and Quality of Life in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07203547
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
View Trial DetailsNCT06890247
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Palermo, Italia, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT05824806
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT06134050
Arthralgia, Arthritis
View Trial Details