Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not yet recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07799532

A Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of NVG-291 in Subjects With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if NVG-291 can improve function in adults with chronic cervical motor-incomplete spinal cord injury. It will also learn about the safety of NVG-291. The main questions it aims to answer are:

* Does NVG-291 improve hand function and daily activities? * What side effects do participants have when taking NVG-291? Researchers will compare NVG-291 to a placebo (a look-alike substance that does not contain NVG-291) to see if NVG-291 improves function in adults with chronic cervical motor-incomplete spinal cord injury.

Participants will:

* Take NVG-291 or a placebo by injection under the skin (subcutaneous) once daily for 12 weeks. * Attend clinic visits for checkups and safety tests. * Complete tests and questionnaires about hand function, walking, daily activities, and quality of life. * Take part in an interview about changes in their condition, within 14 days after the Week 12 visit.

Not yet recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

NervGen NVG-291-301 Site#201, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Loading trial locations.

About this study

NVG-291 is an investigational peptide therapeutic designed to promote nervous system repair by modulating pathways that may inhibit neural regeneration after spinal cord injury. Chronic cervical motor-incomplete spinal cord injury is associated with persistent impairments in upper-extremity function, mobility, independence, and quality of life, and there are currently no approved pharmacologic therapies specifically intended to promote neurological repair in this population. Previous nonclinical studies and an earlier randomized clinical study of NVG-291 provided evidence supporting further evaluation of its potential to improve neurological connectivity and functional recovery in individuals with chronic cervical motor incomplete spinal cord injury.

RESTORE (NVG-291-301) is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of NVG-291 in adults with chronic cervical motor incomplete spinal cord injury. Approximately 150 participants will be enrolled at up to 60 sites in the United States and Canada and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either NVG-291 or placebo. Randomization will be stratified by country and baseline injury severity category.

Participants will receive once-daily subcutaneous administration of study treatment for 12 weeks, followed by a 4-week noninterventional follow-up period. The study is designed to assess treatment effects after completion of the dosing period and to evaluate whether any observed functional changes persist following treatment discontinuation. Primary analysis will be performed at Week 12, with follow-up through Week 16.

In addition to efficacy and safety assessments, the study will characterize the population pharmacokinetics of NVG-291 in a subset of participants receiving NVG-291, and will evaluate patient-reported outcomes, functional measures, quality-of-life assessments, and exploratory measures intended to further characterize the potential effects of NVG-291 on recovery following spinal cord injury. An optional open-label extension study may be offered following completion of the main study to provide access to NVG-291 for participants originally assigned to placebo.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Provide written informed consent prior to any study-specific procedures.
  • Be 18 to 75 years of age, inclusive.
  • Have chronic cervical spinal cord injury resulting from acute traumatic injury occurring 1 to 10 years prior to randomization.
  • Have motor-incomplete cervical spinal cord injury as determined by International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) assessment at screening, meeting all of the following: American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale grade C or D; motor level at C7 or rostral on both the right and the left side; and a muscle grade of 1 or greater on ISNCSCI manual muscle testing in at least one lower-extremity key muscle function (L2 to S1) on either side.
  • Have documented traumatic spinal cord injury confirmed by historical and/or current magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT).
  • Have a Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI II) score of 0 to 14, inclusive.
  • Have a score of at least 2 on at least one GRASSP Prehension Ability grasp pattern (cylindrical grasp, lateral key pinch, or tip-to-tip pinch) in at least one upper extremity, no more than one grasp-pattern score of 4 in the qualifying upper extremity, and a combined (bilateral) GRASSP Quantitative Prehension score no greater than 34, of a possible 40, across the sum of the four Prehension Performance task scores for the right and left hand.
  • Be willing and able to comply with study visits, assessments, study procedures, and study drug administration requirements.
  • Female participants of childbearing potential and male participants must agree to use protocol-specified contraception during study participation.

Exclusion criteria

  • Nontraumatic spinal cord injury, penetrating spinal cord injury, multiple noncontiguous spinal cord lesions, or anatomically complete spinal cord transection.
  • Ventilatory dependence, defined as invasive mechanical ventilation via tracheostomy, noninvasive ventilation for chronic respiratory failure, or diaphragmatic or phrenic nerve pacing. Continuous or automatic positive airway pressure (CPAP/APAP) used solely for obstructive sleep apnea is not exclusionary.
  • Any condition preventing adequate assessment of all four extremities.
  • Any neurological condition that could interfere with study assessments or interpretation of results, including multiple sclerosis, stroke, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, dementia, or progressive syringomyelia.
  • History of uncontrolled seizures or any seizure within 6 months prior to screening.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • History of substance abuse within 12 months prior to screening.
  • Evidence of spinal instability, persistent spinal stenosis, or spinal cord compression related to the original injury.
  • Prior treatment with central nervous system gene therapy. Prior treatment with a protein tyrosine phosphatase sigma (PTPσ) mimetic peptide. Stem cell or cell therapy within 12 months prior to screening.
  • Severe neuropathic pain inadequately controlled by medication.
  • Body mass index (BMI) >40 kg/m².
  • Known hypersensitivity to cetirizine, mannitol, trehalose, or polysorbate 80.
  • Receipt of botulinum toxin injection within 6 months prior to screening or 4-aminopyridine within 7 days prior to first dose. Current intrathecal opioid use.
  • Current participation in another interventional clinical trial or prior exposure to NVG-291.
  • Receipt of prohibited medications or therapies intended to enhance neuroplasticity within protocol-defined restricted periods.
  • Presence of an implanted neurostimulation or brain-computer interface device, or current neurostimulation therapy, including spinal cord stimulation, neuromuscular stimulation, vagal nerve stimulation, or phrenic nerve stimulation.
  • Malignancy within 5 years prior to screening, except adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancer or cervical or breast carcinoma in situ.
  • Clinically significant hepatic disease, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≥3 × upper limit of normal, or severe renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m²).
  • Any disease, injury, medical condition, social condition, or behavioral condition that could interfere with study participation, study assessments, interpretation of results, or compliance with study requirements, in the opinion of the investigator.

Treatment and study plan

NVG-291

Drug

NVG-291 is an investigational peptide therapeutic administered by subcutaneous injection. Participants randomized to the experimental arm will receive NVG-291 once daily for 12 weeks. NVG-291 is designed to promote nervous system repair and functional recovery following chronic spinal cord injury.

Placebo

Drug

Matching placebo is supplied as a sterile lyophilized formulation matching NVG-291 in appearance and route of administration. Participants randomized to the placebo arm will receive placebo once daily by subcutaneous injection for 12 weeks.

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy of NVG-291 as measured by change from baseline in combined Graded and Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) Quantitative Prehension (QtP) score

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

    Change from baseline to Week 12 in the combined GRASSP QtP score. The combined GRASSP QtP score is the sum of four Prehension Performance task scores for the right and the left hand and ranges from 0 to 40. A higher score on GRASSP QtP indicates improved prehension performance.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Efficacy of NVG-291 as measured by change at Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

    Time frame: Week 12

    Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 12. The PGIC is a single-item, patient-reported measure of perception of change in condition, scored on a 7-point scale from 1 (very much worse) to 7 (very much improved). Higher scores indicate greater improvement.

  2. Efficacy of NVG-291 as measured by change at Week 12 in Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC)

    Time frame: Week 12

    The CGIC is a single-item, clinician-reported measure of change in condition, scored on a 7-point scale from 1 (very much worse) to 7 (very much improved). Higher scores indicate greater improvement.

  3. Efficacy of NVG-291 as measured by change from baseline in Spinal Cord Independence Measure Version III (SCIM-III)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

    Change from baseline to Week 12 in the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, Version III (SCIM-III) total score. The SCIM-III total score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater functional independence.

  4. Efficacy of NVG-291 as measured by change from baseline in Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

    Change from baseline to Week 12 in the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) total score, the sum of scores for the quadriceps femoris, hamstrings, and soleus assessed bilaterally. Total scores range from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate more severe spasticity.

  5. Participant-perceived meaningfulness of change assessed by the patient-reported outcome (PRO) Qualitative Interview

    Time frame: Within 14 days after the Week 12 visit

    Patient-reported perception of change from baseline at Week 12, assessed by a semi-structured qualitative interview conducted within 14 days after the Week 12 visit. The interview is not a scored scale and has no minimum or maximum value. Transcripts are coded against a prespecified analysis framework, and results will be reported as the number and percentage of participants reporting meaningful improvement in each prespecified concept.

  6. Efficacy of NVG-291 as measured by change from baseline in 10 Meter Walk Test (10mWT)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

    Change from baseline to Week 12 in walking velocity (meters/second) measured by the 10 Meter Walk Test (10mWT). Higher walking velocity indicates better performance.

  7. Efficacy of NVG-291 as measured by change from baseline in combined GRASSP Total Score

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

    Change from baseline to Week 12 in the combined GRASSP Total score, the sum of the strength, sensibility, and prehension domain scores for the right and the left hand. The combined GRASSP Total score ranges from 0 to 188. Higher scores indicate better upper-extremity function.

  8. Efficacy of NVG-291 as measured by change from baseline in Clinician Global Impression of Severity (CGIS)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

    Change from baseline to Week 12 in the Clinician Global Impression of Severity (CGIS) score. The CGIS is a single-item, clinician-rated measure of overall severity, scored on a 7-point scale from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill). Higher scores indicate greater severity.

  9. Efficacy of NVG-291 as measured by change from baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

    Change from baseline to Week 12 in the Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) score. The PGIS is a single-item, participant-rated measure of overall severity, scored on a 5-point scale from 1 (none) to 5 (very severe). Higher scores indicate greater severity.

  10. Safety and tolerability of NVG-291 as assessed by the incidence of adverse events (AEs)

    Time frame: Informed consent through Week 16

    Incidence of AEs.

  11. Safety and tolerability of NVG-291 as assessed by the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs)

    Time frame: Informed consent through Week 16

    Incidence of SAEs.

  12. Safety and tolerability of NVG-291 as assessed by the number of participants with clinically significant laboratory abnormalities

    Time frame: Baseline through Week 16

    Number of participants with clinically significant abnormalities in clinical laboratory assessments.

  13. Safety and tolerability of NVG-291 as assessed by change from baseline in systolic blood pressure

    Time frame: Baseline through Week 16

    Change from baseline in systolic blood pressure (mmHg).

  14. Safety and tolerability of NVG-291 as assessed by change from baseline in diastolic blood pressure

    Time frame: Baseline through Week 16

    Change from baseline in diastolic blood pressure (mmHg).

  15. Safety and tolerability of NVG-291 as assessed by change from baseline in heart rate

    Time frame: Baseline through Week 16

    Change from baseline in heart rate (beats/minute).

  16. Safety and tolerability of NVG-291 as assessed by change from screening in body weight

    Time frame: Screening through Week 16

    Change from screening in body weight (kg).

  17. Safety and tolerability of NVG-291 as assessed by change from baseline in body temperature

    Time frame: Baseline through Week 16

    Change from baseline in body temperature (°C).

  18. Safety and tolerability of NVG-291 as assessed by the number of participants with clinically significant electrocardiogram abnormalities

    Time frame: Baseline through Week 16

    Number of participants with clinically significant electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities.

  19. Pharmacokinetics of NVG-291 as measured by plasma NVG-291 concentration

    Time frame: Day 1 Through Week 12

    Plasma NVG-291 concentration (ng/mL) in participants randomized to NVG-291 who are included in the pharmacokinetic subset. Samples are collected pre-dose, 30 minutes post-dose, and 3 hours post-dose at each specified visit, to support a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) analysis.

Other outcomes

  1. Efficacy of NVG-291 as measured by change from baseline in combined GRASSP Quantitative Prehension (QtP) score at Week 16

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 16

    Change from baseline to Week 16 in the combined GRASSP QtP score. The combined GRASSP QtP score is the sum of four Prehension Performance task scores for the right and the left hand and ranges from 0 to 40. A higher score on GRASSP QtP indicates improved prehension performance.

  2. Efficacy of NVG-291 as measured by change from baseline in combined GRASSP Total Score at Week 16

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 16

    Change from baseline to Week 16 in the combined GRASSP Total score, the sum of the strength, sensibility, and prehension domain scores for the right and the left hand. The combined GRASSP Total score ranges from 0 to 188. Higher scores indicate better upper-extremity function.

  3. Efficacy of NVG-291 as measured by change from baseline in SCI-QOL Bladder Management Short Form score

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

    Change from baseline to Week 12 in the Spinal Cord Injury - Quality of Life (SCI-QOL) Bladder Management Difficulties Short Form score. Scores are reported as T-scores calibrated to the SCI reference population (mean 50, standard deviation 10), with a possible range of 40.9 to 81.6 for this short form. Higher scores indicate greater bladder management difficulties.

  4. Efficacy of NVG-291 as measured by change from baseline in EQ-5D-5L score

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

    Change from baseline to Week 12 in the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire, reported as the EQ Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS) score. The EQ VAS records self-rated health on a scale of 0 to 100, where 0 is the worst imaginable health state and 100 is the best imaginable health state. Higher scores indicate better health.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Adam Rogers MD, Chief Executive Officer, NervGen Pharma

CONTACT

Study Team

CONTACT

[email protected]

778 731-1711

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

NervGen Pharma

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of NVG-291 in Subjects With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury - A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Multicenter Phase 3 Trial (RESTORE)

Acronym: RESTORE

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Sep 2, 2026
Registry last updated
Sep 2, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.